Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.

Recs

8

Why Didn't Netflix Think of This First?

Don't let it get away!

Keep track of the stocks that matter to you.

Help yourself with the Fool's FREE and easy new watchlist service today.

When you think about cutting-edge cloud-computing entertainment, there's a pretty safe bet that Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT  ) isn't the first name that pops up. However, it's the world's largest retailer that's introducing an intriguing "disc-to-digital" service that will allow DVD and Blu-ray owners to seamlessly access their movies on the cloud.

If this sounds a lot like the UltraViolet initiative, you're warm. The five studios playing along -- Paramount, Sony Pictures, 20th Century Fox, Universal Studios, and Warner Bros. -- are part of the UltraViolet movement where buyers of new DVDs and Blu-rays that are designated as UltraViolet-enabled can be streamed digitally through a unique proof of purchase.

Wal-Mart is raising the stakes by allowing shoppers to hit up any of its 3,500 participating stores to convert older titles from the five studios into UltraViolet.

It may seem awkward, but Wal-Mart is asking couch potatoes to lug their DVD collections to Wal-Mart. They will then activate the eligible discs to be viewed at anytime through the retailer's own digital video Vudu.com website.

Wal-Mart isn't a charity. It's charging disc owners $2 per disc to activate the digital copies. If someone with a standard DVD wants to have access to the HD Blu-ray-quality stream, it will be $5.

It's a fair price, even if all Wal-Mart is doing is simply checking off access to a particular title through Vudu.com. What it ultimately does is make film buffs lean more on Wal-Mart's fledgling video site.

That Vudu that you do
This certainly sounds like something Netflix (Nasdaq: NFLX  ) should have been all over. The biggest shortcoming of its streaming service is a brutal lack of fresh movie titles. If subscribers could have their owned discs "validated," it would open up the streaming possibilities.

More importantly, it would help keep subscribers close. Who would leave Netflix if it was the top streaming service and a personal digital video locker?

Although there surely would be shortcomings:

  • Netflix doesn't have Wal-Mart's thousands of stores, and processing discs by mail for validation could prove costly in terms of postage.
  • If Netflix were to charge for the conversions, could it really strip access if the person canceled his or her Netflix subscription? At least Vudu is a free site.

Of course, there are ways around these obstacles. Netflix could remedy the first shortcoming by simply partnering with a national retailer for local validation.

As for charging one-time fees for a subscription service that could be discontinued, why does this have to be the Wal-Mart model exactly? Netflix could either not charge for the digital conversions, offer a maximum number of free conversions, or simply allow ex-subscribers to continue to access their converted movies.

That last option isn't as bad as it sounds. It would keep ex-subscribers close.

Chasing Sam Walton
Other video chains would have an easier path.

  • Coinstar (Nasdaq: CSTR  ) could reconfigure its Redbox kiosks to do the validation at any of its 35,400 machines. This would dovetail perfectly with the video service it plans to launch later this year.
  • Dish Network (Nasdaq: DISH  ) would love to find a new excuse to get you into a Blockbuster video store. While you're there, how would you feel about switching to a new satellite television provider?
  • Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN  ) would have the same roundtrip postage overhead as Netflix, but this is a company that's used to it and can find ways to offset the costs. Buy certain consumer electronics and get a certain number of free conversions. Get free UltraViolet upgrades on older discs purchased through the leading online retailer. As Netflix's closest competitor in terms of an existing digital smorgasbord, Amazon isn't afraid to take a near-term hit for a long-term customer. Why else would it be willing to sell Kindle Fire tablets at a loss?

It's easy to laugh at Wal-Mart. The company has blown it digitally a few times in the past. However, it's on to something with this. Expect others to follow.

Stream on
Motley Fool co-founder David Gardner has been a fan of Netflix as a disruptor for nearly a decade, but there's a new rule-breaking multibagger that's getting him excited these days. Learn more in a free report that you can download right now.

Jeff Fischer and team have demystified options. And they can rack up income like $1,030... $2,626... and $3,228 on a schedule you can set your watch by!
That's why we're glad to announce every single one of their closely guarded strategies is available to YOU during May and June – 100% FREE, no strings attached! Just enter your email address in the box below...

The Motley Fool owns shares of Wal-Mart Stores and Amazon.com. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Amazon.com, Netflix, Wal-Mart Stores, and Coinstar. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended creating a diagonal call position in Wal-Mart Stores. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Longtime Fool contributor Rick Munarriz has been a Netflix subscriber and shareholder since 2002. He does not own shares in any of the other stocks in this story. Rick is also part of the Rule Breakers newsletter research team, seeking out tomorrow's ultimate growth stocks a day early.


Read/Post Comments (11) | Recommend This Article (8)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 14, 2012, at 10:34 AM, StockPikr0 wrote:

    This is great. I lug all my DVD's to WalMart so that I can then stream them back to my house (instead of just putting the DVD into the slot on the player). I can't wait to have this wonderful feature that allows me to watch all the movies I already own and probably not interested in watching again. What am I missing here? Maybe they are digitizing my movie and adding it to the Vudu library so that others can watch them at a charge? It does not sound right.

  • Report this Comment On March 14, 2012, at 10:58 AM, LWILLS wrote:

    StockPikr0 - you are missing the point. This will allow you to access your DVD content anywhere - you won't have to be sitting on your sofa watching your TV. Many people, especially those with children, need to be able to access their movies multiple ways in multiple places. This opens up a whole new game. I don't want to repurchase digital titles for DVDs I already own, and it is a PITA to try to digitize them myself. I'm not a fan of Walmart at all, but this is a GREAT idea.

    Just want to add another business that could implement this service is Gamestop.

    Lori

  • Report this Comment On March 14, 2012, at 11:41 AM, TMFBreakerRick wrote:

    StockPikr0, they won't be digitizing your movie. The standard and high-def copies are already on the Vudu server. Submitting your DVDs simply gets them validated so you can access Vudu's copy.

    If you don't think that you'll be seeing a certain DVD again, you probably should've rented instead of bought it in the first place. Either way, paying $2 for streaming rights forever -- even if your disc gets scratched, lost, or sold -- is not a bad price for true portability.

  • Report this Comment On March 14, 2012, at 12:25 PM, StockPikr0 wrote:

    Well, I still don't get it, but if it works for you, then OK.

    This seems to be all about being able to view content that you've seen before (regardless of device). I would suspect that with the exception of a few classic or kids movies, most people want to view content that they have not seen before.

    Yes, since streaming came along, I just rent now, and I have no interest in building a "library" of content.

    The article asks why other services did not think of this first. That would be because this is not their model. The NFLX model is to provide content you have not seen before. So, I don't see this as a game changer for anyone.

  • Report this Comment On March 14, 2012, at 1:45 PM, derasa01 wrote:

    Oh I know why!.. Don't understand who will be interested in paying for something that already have and already watched.. STREAMING without owning is the path.....Don't understand the owning concept if I can see it whenever I want in NFLX

  • Report this Comment On March 14, 2012, at 2:18 PM, KingOfPizza wrote:

    People still buy DVDs? And they have such a hard time traveling with them that they need to have their DVD content in the cloud?

    Anyone who actually needs that kind of portability already purchased a DVD ripper and an external storage device 5 years ago.

    I don't own a single DVD. I sold the ~20 I had when I moved last year. I have a streaming Netfilx subscription through my PS3, a computer with the internet, and a $4 second-run movie theater down the street. I watch about 6 movies per month and my average cost to see a movie is about $2.

    But maybe I don't understand because I'm not a videophile.

  • Report this Comment On March 14, 2012, at 3:08 PM, mattdavidian wrote:

    vudu already has the cooperation of the major studios. One of the hurdles NetFlix would have had is they would need to work with the movie studios who at this point might not be keen on setting up a competing services to vudu. mp3.com nearly got sued out of existence by the record labels for doing something similar with music without the approval/cooperation of the big labels.

    My question: Aside from the initial "DVD validation charge", how does vudu/WalMart make money off of streaming movies forever? Is it some kind of loss leader to get consumers into the vudu DRM ecosystem (as opposed to Amazon's or Apple's) to drive future purchases? Or maybe to get consumers to buy DVDs/BluRay in store?

    The one interesting thing about the new vudu service is it seems to be the only way to purchase and own high-definition movie content for streaming. I've seen a lot of high def movie content is available for rental on Amazon, but not available for purchase. I understand this is due to the movie studios' policies.

    The big weakness I see with vudu is it is not ubiquitous. NetFlix is. Any Internet connected TV, BluRay player, game console, or media player has NetFlix built in, but not vudu. A NetFlix-vudu partnership would almost be logical, as the two services complement each other more than compete with each other in terms of the content that is available from each. If NetFlix could deliver your vudu content using their streaming technology, that would be a win.

  • Report this Comment On March 14, 2012, at 7:09 PM, diggerdan28 wrote:

    The real question is, why didn't Blockbuster think of this and save the few stores they have left? (and maybe the company)

  • Report this Comment On March 14, 2012, at 10:45 PM, p1at0 wrote:

    I'm with StockPikr0 on this. I don't get it. I mean, I >get< it, but... I don't get it. I have a bunch of old DVDs -- Lawrence of Arabia, BladeRunner, all the Terminator flicks, Rocky, etc. Probably all the same old DVDs that are rattling around everyone else's coffee table drawers. Why would I want to haul all that down to Wal-Mart and stand in line at customer service to get my forever-streaming rights? What is the compelling need to watch this stuff when I'm on the road? I don't even watch it when I'm at home. Who's sitting in their hotel room in Phoenix at 10 PM, thinking, "Man, I wish I could watch 'Pirates of the Caribbean' (again) right now, on my laptop, instead of all these newfangled movies on the hotel's entertainment menu. I can't believe I forgot to pack that DVD!" Seriously, in what "on the road" situation are you likely to suddenly want to watch -- and have the opportunity to watch -- old movies you've seen a dozen times?

  • Report this Comment On March 14, 2012, at 10:47 PM, InvestWhatWorks wrote:

    @TMFBreakerRick

    "...paying $2 for streaming rights forever..."

    That's not true. It isn't forever. It is just as long as Vudu and/or Ultraviolet is up and running. And Wal-Mart has shown in the past that they don't mind shutting down their online services.

    Wal-Mart shut down their MP3 service just last year.

    And a few years before that, Wal-Mart shut down their previous online video store.

  • Report this Comment On March 15, 2012, at 1:04 PM, 48ozhalfgallons wrote:

    So is DTS sound streamed?

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1816629, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/22/2013 5:00:55 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 7 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 15,387.58 52.30 0.34%
S&P 500 1,669.16 2.87 0.17%
NASD 3,502.12 5.69 0.16%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/21/2013 4:02 PM
WMT $77.39 Down -0.01 -0.01%
Wal-Mart Stores CAPS Rating: ****
NFLX $237.09 Down -2.46 -1.03%
Netflix CAPS Rating: **
DISH $39.93 Up +1.23 +3.18%
DISH Network Corpo… CAPS Rating: **
CSTR $58.54 Up +1.05 +1.83%
Coinstar, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
AMZN $268.86 Up +1.23 +0.46%
Amazon.com CAPS Rating: **

Advertisement