The New Kodak Motto: All for One, and More for Me!

I'm nearly convinced that if Eastman Kodak wants to handle its bankruptcy proceedings like a daytime TV drama, then we should just let Judge Judy handle the proceedings from here on out.

Since declaring bankruptcy in January, things have been turbulent for the former king of film. Eastman Kodak announced that it wil abandon the digital imaging business altogether and instead go toe-to-toe with Hewlett-Packard (NYSE: HPQ  ) , the company where many of its top executives originate, in printers.

To jettison the hundreds of digital imaging patents it has for maximum value, the company has turned to suing Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL  ) and Research In Motion (Nasdaq: RIMM  ) on numerous occasions, claiming that the Apple iPhone and RIM BlackBerry device infringes on its preview imaging technology. In true "he hit me first" fashion, Apple offered its own lawsuit to Kodak, claiming the once great film pioneer absconded with its original digital-camera idea without Apple's knowledge.

Today, we can add a new chapter to the Kodak made-for-TV saga. The company filed paperwork with the bankruptcy court seeking permission to dole out $13.5 million in bonuses to approximately 300 executives and employees who it believes are critical to getting Kodak back on its feet. The bonuses are meant to discourage crucial team members from going to another company. The filing further lumped these crucial components into petri-dish-like groupings: group 1 and group 2. Although no names were identified, group 1 would receive bonuses equal to about 50% of their salary, while group 2 would receive bonuses totaling 25% or less.

This wouldn't even be news -- had it not been that Kodak is bankrupt and seeking permission to hand out bonuses with money it really can't afford to spend.

In a separate filing last week, Kodak withdrew its motion to end supplemental health benefits for some 16,000 retirees currently eligible for Medicare. That's right ... had Kodak not withdrawn this motion, it would have been simultaneously asking for $13.5 million in bonuses to be doled out while cutting off benefits to 16,000 former employees. Nice, right?

Kodak has made some meaningful steps to strengthening its balance sheet, such as selling its online photo platform to Shutterfly (Nasdaq: SFLY  ) for $23.8 million, and licensing a portion of its cinematic patents to IMAX (Nasdaq: IMAX  ) for up to $50 million in royalties, but it has a long way to go before I would consider its balance sheet anywhere near safe to pay out bonuses.

What I wouldn't give to see Judge Judy rip into CEO Antonio Perez and the Kodak board. But that's just wishful thinking, I suppose.

If you'd like the inside track on companies that actually care about their employees and shareholders, then our latest report on 9 Rock-Solid Dividends to Secure Your Retirement is right up your alley. The report can be yours for free!

Fool contributor Sean Williams has no material interest in any companies mentioned in this article. He recently bought a professional camera and is having way too much fun with it. You can follow him on CAPS under the screen name TMFUltraLong, track every pick he makes under the screen name TrackUltraLong, and check him out on Twitter, where he goes by the handle @TMFUltraLong.

The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Apple and IMAX, as well as creating a bull call spread on Apple. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy that never gives you the red-eye effect.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (6)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On April 10, 2012, at 9:27 AM, Jacobsonjk wrote:

    What is unfathomable to me is why they would want to keep the top echelon anyway. Logic would tell us that these are the individuals who ultimately got Eastman Kodak into this position in the first place, and now the judge is supposed to give them money to stay? If anything, the judge should give them some money to go.

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 1858092, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/20/2014 12:37:10 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement