As China Goes Green Is Coal Fading to Black?

On Wednesday, China did the unthinkable by putting environmental concerns ahead of growth. For a country lauded (and feared) as the world's new superpower, this initiative calls into question some of the energy assumptions we investors hold dearest. To put things in perspective, let's take a look at one chart, five companies, and a prediction so crazy it just might come true.

Changing colors and cars
Green is the new red in China. Recently elected Chinese Premier Li Keqiang announced on Sunday that China would ramp up efforts to curb pollution, and by Wednesday its government had passed new stringent fuel standards.

The revised regulation mandates an average 34 mpg for passenger cars by 2015, and 47 mpg by 2020. The most recently available data on China's 2009 fuel efficiency clocked in at approximately 30 mpg. For a peck of perspective, the United States issued new fuel standards last August that call for 35.5 mpg for cars and trucks by 2016 and 54.5 mpg by 2025.

There are obvious automotive winners and losers. Tata Motors' (NYSE: TTM  ) stock dropped 4% on Thursday on fears of falling Jaguar Land Rover sales. Morgan Stanley estimates that the automaker will need to improve average fuel efficiency by 10% to keep its luxury cars on China's lots.

On the other end of automobiles, Ford (NYSE: F  ) seems well-poised to continue its 31-mpg Ford Focus takeover. The Chinese bought more Focuses in 2012 than any other vehicle, and the Blue Oval sold 33,632 in January 2013 alone.

The beginning of coal's end
But there's a deeper story to Li Keqiang's green garnish. The country's air and water pollution records are abhorrent, and these new fuel standards might be the first of many regulations that choose environmental benefit over economic growth. Don't believe me? Just ask a Nobel-winning Harvard economist.

Dr. Simon Kuznets developed a simple but shockingly accurate chart to map out any country's environmental and economic development. It's known (big surprise) as the Kuznets curve:

Source: Author

Dr. Kuznets predicted that when a country first begins to boost its manufacturing economy, environmental concerns are put on the back burner and degradation runs rampant (think Dickensian London). But at some point, environmental benefits begin to outweigh economic growth, and the country works to strike a balance between the two ideals (think logging regulation in the U.S). To put Kuznets' theory into practice, here's where China might've moved this week:

Source: Author

If China did just pass an environmental and economic tipping point, there could be big changes in store for the energy world. China consumes nearly as much coal as the rest of the world combined, and current estimates predict a more than twofold increase in the country's consumption by 2035.

Source: eia.gov 

Over the next couple decades, China and India are expected to account for more than 75% of coal-based energy demand. With dwindling demand in the states, coal companies are betting on China's addiction to their solid black gold. China accounted for 6.8% of Peabody Energy's (NYSE: BTU  ) 2012 sales, a 242% increase over 2011's numbers. Arch Coal (NYSE: ACI  ) pulled 18% of its 2012 revenue from Asia, and as Consol Energy (NYSE: CNX  ) Chairman and CEO J. Brett Harvey said recently:

And remember, it's demand for energy. It's not the ability to serve the customer. The demand is just not there, and we think China's turning a little bit, and that looks pretty strong. As Jim talked about, our inventories there have dropped right inside of China, and we're optimistic. But it's a little bit dicey, yet. I wouldn't give a robust look, but I can tell you we're cautiously optimistic.

The future of coal
Kuznets didn't envision the end of coal, and neither do I. But China's new greenification should serve as a warning sign for China bulls to take off their energy blinders. My crazy prediction: By 2035, China's demand for coal will be…exactly what it is today. Here are three reasons why:

  1. China's lackluster energy efficiency and productivity will improve dramatically.
  2. Domestic production and liquefied natural gas imports will significantly increase China's natural gas consumption.
  3. China's technology leap will aid its first-mover position on cost-competitive alternative energies and smart grid adoption.

Coal stocks are breathing on the fumes of future consumption. Policy moves fast in China, and investors should be well aware that China's legislation light may have just turned green.

Peabody is a significant exporter of coal; it could be further hampered if China moves away from the resource. The Motley Fool has authored a special new premium report detailing exactly why Peabody Energy is worthy of your consideration. Don't miss out on this invaluable resource -- simply click here now to claim your copy today.


Read/Post Comments (4) | Recommend This Article (3)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 22, 2013, at 6:12 PM, LongStockr wrote:

    And chinese gov let Sunteck go bankrupt.

  • Report this Comment On March 22, 2013, at 6:43 PM, Paulson545 wrote:

    This article states two important things. India and China will continue to need massive amounts of coal. The article forgot to mention Japans increased use of coal since the nuclear meltdown. The article also stated China will import more NatGas. What do you think will happen to the price of NatGas when we start exporting it. In the long run it would be cheaper for China, India & Japan to continue to use coal but build power plants with pollution control equipment.

  • Report this Comment On March 22, 2013, at 6:45 PM, Paulson545 wrote:

    With China and India's population still growing social unrest will become the #1 issue instead of caving in to the International Organization of Green Winnies.

  • Report this Comment On March 24, 2013, at 4:51 PM, MarkOfBeast wrote:

    Justin:

    You must have just came from another planet and have never heard about communists. You must have thought that the Chinese communists are the most honest politicians on earth and they always say what they mean and do what they say.

    Nothing is further from the truth for any one with the slightest knowledge of any communist country. The Party always claimed that it put people's interest ahead of its own. Actually the party claims that it does NOT have its own special interest. The truth is otherwise. They have sloganed to crack down on corruption and do other good things that the people want them to do, for a few decades. The exact opposite happened. They have emphasized on pollution control for decades But China has become the world's most polluted country.

    So anything new today that they claim they are going to put the environment first before the development? Nothing new here and one can predict the exact opposite will happen.

    Don't you know that China's coal consumption grew the fastest AFTER they signed the Kyoto Protocol and vowed to cut down carbon emission. They really mean it, the "low carbon lifestyle" slogan is painted on every corner of city streets and all that, and they push for low carbon to such extreme that grocery stores would not provide free plastic bags. You have to pay for it. If you think that makes China a low carbn society think again, China is moving towards high carbon at breakneck pace and they can't even slow it.

    In China, the political slogans and the realities are two completely different set of things.

    China is going to burn more coal and import much more. If China promises to craw back into caverns and live a low carbon life, you'd better do NOT believe the fairy tale.

    To the communists, keeping the economy expanding and keeping people employed is critical to maintain communist rule. They will do whatever they can to keep growing at all costs.

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 2327375, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/17/2014 2:53:52 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement