Will BP Be Freed of Bogus Damage Claims?

Three years from the halting of BP's (NYSE: BP  ) monstrous Gulf of Mexico Macondo oil gusher, it appears that the company may gain a way to "Freeh" itself from a mountain of baseless damage claims tied to the tragedy.

With all manner of bogus suits being submitted in an effort to tap a company facility established to compensate those actually damaged by the spill, U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier of New Orleans this week called in Louis Freeh, a former FBI director, to separate the wheat from the chaff among the claimants. Freeh is fresh from heading up an investigation into the sex crimes scandal that recently swept through the Penn State football program.

Barbier has ultimate authority over the settlement program. Unfortunately for BP, he's also presiding over an ongoing non-jury trial in New Orleans that's intended to assess federal environmental penalties against the company. So, incurring his wrath could be dangerous. Depending on the degree of culpability that's tied to the company in precipitating the spill, BP could be forced to cough up as much as $17.5 billion in fines and penalties to the Obama administration.

Others in the gun sights
That trial also involves Transocean (NYSE: RIG  ) and Halliburton (NYSE: HAL  ) . The former, of course, owned the Deepwater Horizon rig, which exploded and sank, killing 11 crewmen south of New Orleans three years ago.

Halliburton was responsible for cementing the Macondo well. BP maintains that both companies were at fault in causing the conflagration. The second-largest member of the oil-field services sector, Halliburton has tangled with Barbier during the trial, allegedly for being dilatory in turning over documents requested by the court.

Crazy contentions
But it's the private claims, generated by citizens, businesses, and municipalities in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida, that'll leave you shaking your head. A number of the checks already written by BP to make whole "victims" of the biggest oil spill in U.S. history bear little, if any, relationship to crude unleashed by the gusher. Further, the use of the funds paid out by the company has often been questionable, as well.

As Bloomberg Businessweek pointed out in an excellent article recently:

  • A construction company located in northern Alabama, a couple hundred miles from the Gulf, pocketed $9.7 million, despite doing no work near the coast. 
  • A law firm in central Louisiana managed to rake in $3.3 million, even though its profits actually grew in 2010.
  • A minor league baseball stadium will be built in Biloxi, Mississippi, with funds commandeered from BP. 
  • Alabama will build an $85-million conference center and hotel with monies similarly obtained.
  • An alligator farm some 50 miles northwest of New Orleans received $1.2 million, an amount that exceeded the business's profits in 2010.

Far too easy
Businessweek quotes a Houston trial attorney who says that BP is getting its comeuppance for not being tough enough, and cutting "a bad deal." Specifically, in its determination to make nice with those in the Gulf region and thereby avoiding a public relations disaster, it began paying against claims before the spill had even been contained.

Foolishly, as the Texas lawyer says, it "failed to demand a cap on its total payout." Indeed, as you wil likely recall, with crude still gushing from the Gulf's floor and no apparent end in sight, the company promised President Obama that it would set up a fund with $20 billion for cleanup costs, and dealing with damage claims.

That approach differed meaningfully from ExxonMobil's (NYSE: XOM  ) stance two decades earlier, when the Exxon Valdez oil tanker ran aground in Alaska's Prince William Sound, resulting in a another big spill. Rather than figuratively groveling in an act of contrition, as BP effectively did, management of the biggest integrated company fought hard in the courts for 20 years to absolve itself, as much as possible, of liability.

Foolish takeaway
I must admit to owning both BP and Transocean. The latter clearly is less directly in litigious crosshairs than the London-based operator. And while Louis Freeh's entrance onto the scene represents a new adult presence in Macondo matters, I'd note that, while I consider BP an appropriate buy for Foolish energy investors, that assessment is only for those with more than a pound of patience.
Sources

If you're a fan of the energy sector, you might want to learn more about National Oilwell Varco, a favorite of many Fools with a taste for the sector. Simply check out the special free report: "The Only Energy Stock You'll Ever Need." Don't miss out on this limited-time offer and your opportunity to become more familiar with this company. Click here to access your report -- it's totally free.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 05, 2013, at 8:10 PM, ThisIsUnReal wrote:

    I'm surprised they didn't figure out who was REALLY to blame...

    The oil rig was 50 miles off shore, we own to the 20 mile limit... This was Obama's first Bengazi...

    That oil had to travel 30 miles before it even hit our territory... We could have easily had barrier put up to stop it 20 miles off shore, if Obama was half a President... shoot Half a mayor... or even had half a brain...

    It takes about 4 hours for a purse seiner to drop a net big enough to have caught that oil, 20 miles out (purse seiners are the boats that Chicken of the Sea through Green Peace kicked out of the ocean to eliminate Chicken of the Sea's competition, now we eat baby tuna instead of adult tuna)

    We were offered tons of help, just like in Bengazi, and just like in Bengazi, Obama said "NO!!!"

    The United States should be paying for most of the damage, on behalf of our great leadership

    And YES, we have to protect ourselves and then sue the perpetrator for reimbursement.

    BP should only be paying for our efforts to stop the oil from hitting our land and any damage they caused in the international waters they were occupying.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2524864, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/18/2014 11:06:00 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement