Can Lenovo Fix Microsoft's Problems?

If Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT  ) won't fix what's wrong with Windows, maybe the system builders will.

The world's largest software specialist heard users complaining about the user interface of its Windows 8 desktop operating system. Among other things, Redmond got us used to the classic Start Menu in Windows 95, but removed it entirely in 17 years later in Windows 8. No soft step down from one interface to the other, and there's nothing optional about the new Metro model's start screen.

Mr. Softy responded to the controversy by making the new interface work slightly more like the old one, starting with this fall's Windows 8.1 update. The old Start Button is back as yet another way to invoke the not-at-all-familiar Start Screen.

But if you really want the old Start Menu back, you're still stuck installing third-party solutions. Frankly, I'd guess that the longtime Windows users who want the Start Menu back the most would also be the ones least likely to find a hacker-like solution.

Enter the Chinese dragon.

China-based systems builder Lenovo acquired IBM's consumer systems division way back in 2005. Big Blue helped Microsoft start the personal computing revolution but was ready to refocus on higher-margin enterprise solutions. Lenovo was happy to take IBM's low-margin but high-volume business and use it as a springboard into the West. The company has recently become the largest PC seller in the world. It's a market force to be reckoned with.

And now Lenovo steps in to help Microsoft do the right thing.

Lenovo will ship PC systems with a pre-installed reincarnation of the old Start Menu, starting in the next few weeks and eventually rolling out to every Lenovo market worldwide. The menu comes from software distribution upstart SweetLabs, which makes a turnkey Start Menu replacement called Pokki.

This package comes with some serious corporate backing, though. When Microsoft's early test versions of the original Windows 8 system emerged and made it clear that the Start Menu would go AWOL, the investment arms of Google (NASDAQ: GOOGL  ) and Intel (NASDAQ: INTC  ) poured millions of dollars into SweetLabs to support Pokki's development.

Intel and Google also care about desktops and laptops sticking around. Chips for such systems are a critical source of revenue for Intel while its smartphone and tablet products are just getting started. Google doesn't really care what system you're using to click on its ads, but the company generally loves it when consumers get along with their Internet gateways -- including desktops.

These industry titans are perfectly able to finance and co-develop solutions for Microsoft's missteps, but they need help to get the final result onto the end-user market. I can't think of a better option than Lenovo, which has become the largest system vendor anywhere and should be able to set the tone for the entire PC market.

I wouldn't be surprised to see other PC builders following suit in short order. If Microsoft won't build essential features into its operating system, the free market finds a way to work around the problem.

The tech world has been thrown into chaos as the biggest titans invade one another's turf. At stake is the future of a trillion-dollar revolution: mobile. To find out which of these giants is set to dominate the next decade, we've created a free report called "Who Will Win the War Between the 5 Biggest Tech Stocks?" Inside, you'll find out which companies are set to dominate and give in-the-know investors an edge. To grab a copy of this report, simply click here -- it's free!


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On August 26, 2013, at 8:45 AM, TMayea wrote:

    Anders,

  • Report this Comment On August 26, 2013, at 8:49 AM, TMayea wrote:

    Anders,

    I believe Microsoft's decision to NOT build "essential" features into it's operating system is the reason it became, and is, the dominating OS.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2607184, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/25/2014 10:08:53 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement