"Insidious Chapter 2" Had Better Thank Netflix

Some sequels are better off left unmade. 

Yes, I'm talking to you, Grown Ups 2. Don't think you're getting a free pass, Speed 2: Cruise Control. If the original entry was critically panned -- cough, cough, Grown Ups -- there's no reason to keep going. If a movie works under the outrageous premise that a bus will blow up if it slows down, there's no need to whisk Sandra Bullock onto a cruise ship for a sequel to Speed.

This brings us to Insidious Chapter 2. The followup to 2011's Insidious hits a multiplex near you next weekend, and it certainly wasn't the kind of box-office smash that would send studios scrambling for a sequel. The supernatural horror flick about a family coping with a demon-possessed son took in just a little more than $54 million in its domestic theatrical run. 

However, the movie has been well reviewed. Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX  ) users have bestowed it a rating of 3.7 stars out of five, and that's a pretty good rating on the leading video service. The movie was available for streaming on Netflix until this past May, when a licensing deal ran out, and its success there probably played a major part in the decision to for FilmDistrict to go ahead with a sequel. 

Nearly 1.8 million Netflix subscribers have rated the movie. That's huge for a movie that was seen by fewer than 7 million moviegoers when it was playing on the big screen (dividing $54 million in box office receipts by the average ticket price in 2011 of $7.93). We've seen Netflix build an audience for TV shows including Mad Men and, more recently, Breaking Bad. But now we have a good example of Netflix streaming as an asset to a theatrical franchise if the sequel manages to beat out the original. 

Source: FilmDistrict.

It also helps that supernatural movies have been storming back to life this year. Time Warner's (NYSE: TWX  ) The Conjuring has raked in more than $134 million in ticket sales this summer. That's not too shabby for a movie with a $20 million production budget. Mama's $71 million take earlier this year wasn't as impressive, but it still fared better than Insidious.

Let's hope that the producers of Insidious Chapter 2 keep this all in mind as the next few weeks play out. Thanking Netflix -- and The Conjuring -- won't happen. The Netflix licensing deal went away four months ago. Time Warner's creepy movie is the competition. However, it would be the right thing to do.

"It will take what you love most," is the film's tag line, but it's those two factors that helped bring it back.

If you want to see something really scary, check out the price of oil these days
Think the days of $100 oil are gone? Think again. In fact, the market is there right now. But for investors who are positioned to profit from the return of $100 oil, it can't come soon enough. To help investors get rich off rising oil prices, our top analysts prepared a free report that reveals three stocks that are bound to soar as oil prices climb higher. To discover the identities of these stocks instantly, access your free report by clicking here now.


Read/Post Comments (4) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 07, 2013, at 9:31 PM, AllenAG wrote:

    Hello I'm sorry but this article is all wrong. Not sure what you are comparing the box office take to, but Insidious was made for a little over a million, it took in 50+ million in domestics, even when cost of advertising and theater take that is considered a big hit. It was the highest grossing film of 2011 and took in close to 100 million worldwide. Also another point of contention Mama did not fare better box office wise than Insidious when how much it cost to make is taken into account. Good idea for an article and no disrespect but some wrong facts.

  • Report this Comment On September 07, 2013, at 9:44 PM, RaganFaux wrote:

    Insidious 2 was the MOST PROFITABLE FILM of 2011. Motley Fool has become a shadow of itself. Even middle school students know to glance over a Wikipedia page before writing an essay. Fail. Fail. Fail.

  • Report this Comment On September 07, 2013, at 9:52 PM, wcmartell wrote:

    The thing you missed is the ROI for INSIDIOUS, which cost $800k to make. (Though the studio is now reporting that it cost $1.5m... so that they could pocket some more money.)

    I'm pretty sure INSIDIOUS 2 was greenlit after the first week of INSIDIOUS' release.

    Another element that your writer should have considered if he'd had more than a double digit IQ is the average BO for a horror movie - which is around $50m-60m domestic. Usually horror films are made for $15m, make 50-60m, and everyone is happy. In the case of INSIDIOUS it was made outside the system (so none of the bogus overhead charges) for under $1m... and that made the average profits even more profitable.

  • Report this Comment On September 08, 2013, at 3:20 AM, Rmj1979 wrote:

    Agree w the other comments. Not a box office smash? More profit than most Hollywood blockbusters. The sequel is a no brainer.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2626962, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/20/2014 1:09:34 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement