This Could Be the Real Reason Bank of America Was Ousted From the Dow

The swapping-out of three of the Dow Jones Industrial Average components for an equal number of new names came as a big surprise to many, and the first shake-up in almost 10 years for the venerable index. The news that larger-than-life companies Alcoa (NYSE: AA  ) , Bank of America (NYSE: BAC  ) , and Hewlett-Packard (NYSE: HPQ  ) no longer had what it takes to maintain presence on the Dow naturally begged the question: Where did these companies go wrong?

How companies make the cut
The methods used by the group that makes these calls, the S&P Dow Jones Indices Committee, aren't entirely transparent, but they do abide by some basic rules. According to its website, the group usually considers a company for inclusion "only if it has an excellent reputation, demonstrates sustained growth, is of interest to a large number of investors and accurately represents the sector(s) covered by the average."

Taking a look at Bank of America, I believe the area in which it was found wanting was that of reputation -- an issue that has plagued the big bank for some time now.

Comparing the losers
The committee commented on the day of the announcement that the change had been decided upon because of the low stock prices of the three companies, as well as the need to diversity the index. For an index based upon price-weight, share price indeed matters. Put together, the three companies weigh in at just under 2.30% of the entire index, compared to IBM (NYSE: IBM  ) , which currently commands 9.43% all on its own.

In the growth department, Alcoa is a definite laggard, having lost 80% of its value since 2007. Both HP and B of A also lost much of their stock value over the past few years, although each had experienced growth as of late, with Bank of America's share price rising 70% over the past year, and HP's moving up a respectable 27%.

But, the computer maker has had some serious problems recently, and the latest quarterly earnings report and commentary from management put to rest any hopes of forward momentum for the company, at least for the foreseeable future. Bank of America, with its Project New BAC, is all about whipping itself into shape, with the goal of focusing on its customers and investors. 

A question of diversity
As far as diversifying the index is concerned, substituting Nike (NYSE: NKE  ) and Visa (NYSE: V  ) for Alcoa and Hewlett-Packard certainly represents a change, but what about substituting Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS  ) for B of A? Replacing one bank with another doesn't seem like a huge shift, even if the former is an investment institution.

Besides, if Alcoa and HP don't represent the greater economy anymore, that doesn't seem true of Bank of America, which, with both retail and investment units, seems more representative of the economy than its replacement.

B of A's reputation precedes it
While the huge gains in Bank of America's share price over the past year point to its popularity with investors, the rest of humankind seem to hold the bank in particularly low esteem. Time after time, as this piece by fellow Fool John Maxfield notes, B of A manages to wind up at the bottom of any given heap when it comes to scoring the positive aspects of banks. And, it's not just customers who feel such disdain for the bank -- even noncustomers despise Bank of America.

Was its grubby image the real reason for the bank's eviction from the Dow? While I doubt the Dow's managers would ever say so, I believe it is. It's truly a shame, too, especially since CEO Brian Moynihan has been trying to shine up the bank's reputation this year -- but he just doesn't seem to be making any headway.

Unfortunately, the longer this issue goes unresolved, the harder it will be to execute a turnaround. Until some of that tarnish can be removed from its image, Bank of America will continue to find just how important the value of a good reputation is when it comes to commercial success.

Where the Money Is
Have you missed out on the massive gains in bank stocks over the past few years? There's good news: It's not too late. Bargains of a lifetime are still available, but you need to know where to look. The Motley Fool's new report "Finding the Next Bank Stock Home Run" will show you how and where to find these deals. It's completely free -- click here to get started.


Read/Post Comments (4) | Recommend This Article (6)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 15, 2013, at 11:09 AM, Rusty56 wrote:

    Its reputation is just fine for the 50% of Americans who do business with the Bank. With those who have a bad perspective of the bank, it's due to one of two reasons. Either they are bitter because they couldn't pay the bank back and were foreclosed on or they just have that perception because of the idiots in the media who like to bash the bank. Some of the fools fit the latter category as well. I just read that 1/3 of all business loans in the last year were taken out thru this big bad bank. Interesting to see that businesses don't share the same views. this statistic is flat out incredible to say the least. Brian is doing something right.

  • Report this Comment On September 15, 2013, at 11:26 AM, anyon wrote:

    All arguments advocating stocks in your portfolio based on the Dow's historical record are bogus. They add new stocks when a promising company gets going and drop older stocks that you probably already hold and which are going down the drain, along with your wealth. It's amazing how fast some of these companies go belly up. Admittedly it was not in the Dow, but there was a lot of buzz about Nortel in 2000. Seven years later it was bankrupt.

  • Report this Comment On September 15, 2013, at 11:37 AM, kevinandjane wrote:

    Could not agree more rifleman5579, well said. Bank bashing has become a fashionable trend for our friends in the media, as well as a useful strategy for politicians looking for votes from vulnerable misinformed Americans. Don't get me started on how lawyers are having a heyday targeting big bad banks in the land of litigation. No one can deny that BAC made some real serious mistakes and has some culpability in the financial mess. However (investment)opinions,as in this example, that are way too steeped in the emotional, as opposed to the factual, arena are better left for the national enquirer.

  • Report this Comment On September 15, 2013, at 9:44 PM, syzygysyzygy wrote:

    lower level personnel dont know their business dont know even FICA insurance details even when they are printed in B of A literature!!!!!

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2636677, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/26/2014 10:13:43 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Apple's next smart device (warning, it may shock you

Apple recently recruited a secret-development "dream team" to guarantee its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of this type of device will be sold per year. But one small company makes Apple's gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early-in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here!


Advertisement