Carl Icahn's Decision to Sell Netflix Was Smarter Than He Knew

On Tuesday afternoon, Carl Icahn's Icahn Enterprises (NASDAQ: IEP  ) released a somewhat bizarre press release, noting that it had sold more than half of its Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX  ) stock -- nearly 3 million shares in total. The release noted that the decision to sell had been made by Carl Icahn himself, rather than by the portfolio managers, David Schechter and Brett Icahn.

In fact, the release contains a long statement by Schechter and Brett Icahn in which they affirm their investment thesis and claim that Netflix is still significantly undervalued, despite having more than quintupled since they bought the stock. Moreover, Carl Icahn stated that he mostly agreed with their analysis.

In other words, the decision to sell Netflix had nothing to do with the possibility that Netflix's amazing run has taken it into "overvalued" territory. Icahn sold half of his stock simply "to take some of the chips off the table." Yet Carl Icahn's decision to radically scale back his Netflix stake was smarter than he knew, because the investment thesis laid out by Schechter and Brett Icahn is deeply flawed.

Irrational exuberance
I'd like to focus on the "domestic" side of the bull case from Schechter and Icahn. They also believe international markets represent a huge opportunity for Netflix, but if they're overestimating the domestic opportunity, it also seems likely that they're overestimating the international opportunity.

In the U.S., Schechter and Icahn expect Netflix to increase domestic streaming revenue by $4.3 billion over the next five years. That would put domestic streaming revenue just over $7 billion by 2018! Part of the revenue gain would be driven by price increases, as Icahn and Schechter believe Netflix could charge $9.99 a month by 2018.

Still, Netflix would need to grow its domestic subscriber base to around 60 million (which is the low end of CEO Reed Hastings' long-term addressable market estimate) to meet this target. While this may occur eventually, the rapid-growth scenario Schechter and Brett Icahn envision seems extremely far-fetched.

First, as Netflix grows in the U.S., it will start to saturate the market. There are only 88 million broadband households in the U.S. today. Moreover, some of them may not be interested in an Internet video service (or may be very slow to adopt it), and some may choose competing services such as Hulu or Amazon.com's (NASDAQ: AMZN  ) Prime Instant Video.

Netflix is already projecting that subscriber growth will slow modestly year over year in the current quarter. As Netflix becomes larger, it will only get harder to produce big year-over-year subscriber gains. Yet Schechter and Icahn project average gains of 5.4 million domestic subscribers annually for the next five years -- just slightly slower than this year's growth rate.

Second, any price increase is bound to upset the subscriber growth trajectory, just as it did two years ago. Analysts at Wedbush recently completed a survey, which found that 79% of domestic streaming subscribers would oppose a price increase.

Obviously, these surveys should be taken with a grain of salt; it's very unlikely that 79% of Netflix subscribers would cancel if prices went up. However, a price increase would probably increase the churn rate (the percentage of subscribers canceling each month). The larger Netflix grows, the more damage an uptick in churn would do to growth.

For example, let's assume that Netflix adds 5.5 million domestic subscribers per year for the next two years, ending 2015 with 44 million domestic subscribers. Suppose that Netflix then raises the price to $9.99 for 2016, causing a 1% increase in churn that lasts through 2016. That would mean an additional 440,000 cancellations per month, or 5.3 million incremental cancellations over the course of 2016 -- completely wiping out subscriber growth.

It would be very challenging to reach 60 million domestic subscribers by the end of 2018 even with no price increases, as saturation will start to pressure growth in the next year or two. Including a price increase, it seems fanciful to expect 60 million domestic Netflix subscribers by 2018. Netflix will probably show strong domestic streaming revenue growth over the next five years, perhaps doubling revenue to $5.5 billion. However, that would still leave a $1.5 billion shortfall relative to Schechter and Icahn's forecast.

Unrealistic cost containment
While David Schechter and Brett Icahn expect rapid subscriber growth despite an eventual price increase, they think content cost growth will dramatically slow going forward. Year-to-date, domestic streaming "cost of revenue" is up 19% year over year. Yet Schechter and Icahn think domestic content costs might increase by only $1 billion over the next five years -- a 9% compound annual growth rate.

This forecast is just as unrealistic as the subscriber growth projection. Content costs are rising rapidly in the U.S. streaming industry because of a surge in competition, particularly from Amazon and Hulu. Moreover, Netflix needs to invest heavily in original and exclusive content to keep pulling in new subscribers (presumably there's a reason today's non-subscribers aren't Netflix members yet).

However, these exclusive deals are very expensive. For instance, last year the company signed a big exclusive deal for Disney movies that goes into effect in 2016. The expected cost? Upwards of $350 million per year! That one deal would represent 19% of Netflix's U.S. streaming content costs for 2013.

As Netflix's favorable content deals expire over the next three years and the company increases the percentage of its budget devoted to original and/or exclusive content, Netflix will have to pay significantly more than it does today just to maintain the same offering. Improving the overall content offering will add even more expenses.

At the recent growth rate, domestic streaming "cost of revenues" would rise to $4.4 billion by 2018. Even assuming some slowdown in the cost inflation rate, domestic content costs still seem likely to reach $3.5 billion to $4 billion by 2018, as opposed to the less than $3 billion figure Schechter and Brett Icahn propose.

Not such a no-brainer
David Schechter and Brett Icahn envision a scenario wherein Netflix could grow its domestic streaming contribution profit from a little over $600 million this year to nearly $4 billion per year by 2018. This assumes that Netflix's content cost growth will slow dramatically. while subscriber growth stays near 2013 rates (in spite of an eventual price increase).

However, their scenario vastly overstates the potential for "operational leverage" at Netflix. In a realistic scenario, revenue growth will fall short of their target by more than $1 billion while content cost growth could exceed their target by just as much. This creates a shortfall of more than $2 billion to the 2018 profit estimates Schechter and Brett Icahn use.

Even if Netflix grows domestic streaming contribution profit by only $1 billion over the next five years, the stock still could grow into its valuation if Netflix's international expansion succeeds. However, Netflix is hardly undervalued at its current market cap of $20 billion.

If Carl Icahn really believes in Netflix's profit growth potential as much as David Schechter and Brett Icahn do, he's vastly overestimating the company's prospects. His decision to sell 3 million shares anyway was therefore even smarter than he thought it was.

The future for Netflix
Netflix is quickly becoming a powerhouse in the video industry. But is it the best way to profit from the Internet TV revolution? The Motley Fool's top experts answer this question and more in a special report titled "Will Netflix Own the Future of Television?" The report outlines where the future of television is heading and offers top ideas for how to profit. To get your free copy, just click here!


Read/Post Comments (6) | Recommend This Article (3)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On October 26, 2013, at 4:45 PM, AceInMySleeve wrote:

    You essentially say 'no -- that's not gonna happen' without providing any evidence or significant argumentation.

  • Report this Comment On October 26, 2013, at 6:11 PM, jb757 wrote:

    There would be 440,000 cancellations per month or 5M/yr due to a price increase? That's crazy. You have no idea why people subscribe to Netflix and why it is so valuable.

  • Report this Comment On October 26, 2013, at 6:18 PM, TMFGemHunter wrote:

    I find it somewhat amusing that I think 70%-75% of U.S. broadband households will have some kind of video streaming subscription within 5 years, and Netflix will have 70%-75% of the market, and that makes me bearish.

    Adam

  • Report this Comment On October 27, 2013, at 1:27 AM, dannystrong wrote:

    Look, Icahn is just a rich guy stomping around trying to destroy what he can and steal what money he can. He's just another George Soros, without the trendy friends (he could get trendy friends like George did, of course - they're entirely for sale.) Somebody at netflix probably was rude to Mr. Icahn, and this is the only revenge he could think of, to try and make people think he was 'getting out before the crash.'

    People keep declaring netflix dead, but somehow they just keep doing business. That might mean that the declarers are not as smart as they believe themselves to be.

    (Disclamer: no stock in netflix, or IEP.)

  • Report this Comment On October 27, 2013, at 10:18 AM, enjoylife wrote:

    Although I've heard in the past that Netflix opposes charging their existing subscribers for individual movies like new release, I believe there is opportunity for them in this space which would add to revenue and profit. My family likes to watch movies. Sometimes, we cannot find a movie where we agree either on Netflix or Amazon Prime (free). When this occurs we expand our search by looking at the pay-per-view movies available on Amazon. We typically find a newer release we can agree on and we rationalize the cost by dividing it by the number of people sitting in the living room. I'm sure other families do this as well. Netflix is always our first choice (likely because it was our first streaming service). Wish it had the choice to purchase the newer releases individually so we wouldn't have to go to their competitors. I promise having "free" (covered in our subscription) and pay-for-view movies won't confuse us. It doesn't on Amazon!

  • Report this Comment On October 28, 2013, at 11:33 AM, dapperone wrote:

    I don't know whether or not NFLX will continue to sink, but I notice that the author's argument focuses entirely upon growth prospects for broadband connected households. What about growth in mobile streaming?

    As for dannystrong's idea that someone at NFLX must have ticked off Icahn: there's no evidence for that. The NFLX investment was clearly his son's idea, and Icahn has often shown in the past that he tends not to stay with investments that are his own idea that he seems enthusiastic about for multiple years or decades a la Buffett. Icahn collected his cash at the earliest tax advantageous time, just after one year. If the rest of the investment goes to zero he still has netted $500 million. A year in the life of a multi-billionaire.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2700050, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/21/2014 8:01:14 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement