Monsanto's First Quarter Wasn't as Good as it Seemed

Despite a very positive tone from management, Monsanto's first-quarter results left much to be desired

Jan 14, 2014 at 1:00PM

Editor's note: A previous version of this article incorrectly stated Honey Nut Cheerios would be GMO free, but only original Cheerios will be stripped of all genetically modified organisms. The Motley Fool regrets the error. 

Monsanto (NYSE:MON) reported first quarter results last Wednesday, and I'd almost characterize the press release as "triumphant". Despite certain setbacks, Monsanto posted a second consecutive quarter of record cash from operations, and reiterated its $5.00 to $5.20 per share guidance for fiscal 2014. However, digging a little deeper reveals a few problems investors shouldn't overlook.

An expensive mop
Management specifically referred to a "second consecutive quarter of record cash for share repurchases". It's interesting that the emphasis was on share repurchases, as the current round of share repurchases is authorized for $2 billion, but that should be taken with a grain of salt. Despite hundreds of millions spent on share repurchases over the last several years, actual shares outstanding has stayed roughly the same, declining less than 5 percent in the last ten years. These buybacks have done little more than absorb share dilution.

MON Average Diluted Shares Outstanding (Quarterly) and MON Stock Buybacks (TTM) Chart

MON Average Diluted Shares Outstanding (Quarterly) and MON Stock Buybacks (TTM) data by YCharts

A better use of that record cash from operations would be to increase the paltry dividend, which currently yields just 1.4 percent.

A better quarter than the competition's
Another quirk worth noting is where Monsanto's sales and income growth came from this quarter. The Seeds and Genomics segment, which accounted for 70 percent of sales in 2013, declined 5 percent this quarter. This was offset by incredible growth in the Agricultural Productivity segment, due largely to price increases.

Fellow Fool Stephen D. Simpson is troubled by the decline in Seeds and Genomics, but it's not surprising. Corn seeds are Monsanto's single biggest product by far, and the price of corn has fallen almost 40 percent over the last year from near record highs -- it makes sense that farmers would be buying and planting fewer seeds. Dow Chemical (NYSE:DOW) also saw its seeds segment decline in its most recent quarter, and Syngenta (NYSE:SYT) was even forced to pre-emptively write down the value of its corn seeds inventory in excess of estimated sales.

The fact that Monsanto was able to successfully lean on its other products this quarter should be seen as a strength of the business rather than a weakness, especially given the highly synergistic relationship between Monsanto's agricultural productivity products and its seeds, which are specially designed to tolerate said products. However, Monsanto also acquired The Climate Corporation this quarter, a company which uses weather data to provide crop insurance to farmers. This isn't exactly unrelated to the core business, but it's certainly tangential, and it will be interesting to see whether it pays off for the company.

Can't forget about controversy
A discussion of Monsanto never feels complete without touching on the political climate. Despite essentially no scientific evidence that genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are unhealthy, General Mills (NYSE:GIS)recently became the latest company to bow to consumer pressure to remove them from some of its products. The company announced that original Cheerios would now be GMO free. While other flavors like Honey Nut aren't affected, that may change down the road. Honey Nut Cheerios and regular Cheerios are the No. 1 and 4 cereal brands in America, representing almost a billion dollars in sales, not to mention the other various Cheerios products.

As my colleague Brian Stoffel notes, Monsanto CEO Hugh Grant (not the actor) was quick to downplay the situation by pointing out that Cheerios are already made from GMO-free oats, but corn starch and sugar are the next two top ingredients.

While Cheerios' corn and sugar needs are probably not a significant source of revenue for seed companies like Monsanto, Dow, or Syngenta, General Mills is a prominent company whose product decisions can make waves in the food industry. The Cheerios decision echoes Whole Foods' decision last year to require GMO labeling on every product it sells, an ambitious project it plans to complete by 2018. These kinds of moves are great PR, but don't do much good for Monsanto or its peers, despite CEO Grant's diplomatic assurances that he's glad for the debate.

The Foolish bottom line
Despite record first quarter cash from operations, this wasn't as clear of a win for Monsanto as management might make it seem. While it's good that earnings per share isn't being whittled away by a runaway denominator, shareholders would be better served by a larger dividend than buybacks that just mop up share dilution.

Going forward, The Climate Corporation acquisition may be Monsanto's effort to use stable insurance profits to level out the rest of the business in the face of erratic crop prices and the ever-present threat of GMO-banning.

A better choice for investors
There's a huge difference between a good stock, and a stock that can make you rich. Monsanto might not be either right now, but The Motley Fool's chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for 2014, and it's one of those stocks that could make you rich. You can find out which stock it is in the special free report: "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2014." Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.


Fool contributor Jacob Roche has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information