Was Netflix the Big Winner at the Golden Globes?

Netflix may have only won one award at the Golden Globes, but the company went a long way toward gaining mind-share with potential customers and striking a blow at rival HBO.

Jan 17, 2014 at 8:37AM

Netflix (Nasdaq: NFLX) may have only taken home one statue at the 2014 Golden Globes, but the pay service might actually be the big winner at the annual celebration of television and film. Even though the company's only award was "House of Cards'" Robin Wright as best actress in a television series, the exposure from the Golden Globes may prove an invaluable revenue driver -- and cachet builder -- that validates the company's expensive decision to produce original content.

Though Netflix, as of its last quarterly report, has an impressive 31 million subscribers, that's a fraction of the 103 million homes with cable and 114 million U.S. TV homes that have some sort of paid cable, satellite, Telco or other service, according to SNL Kagan last August. Every mention of the pay service to the over 20 million people who watched the Globes and the millions more who saw news coverage of them was like a free commercial (and in 2012 each 30-second spot sold for around $400,000)..

"House of Cards?" "Orange is the New Black?" What are they and where can I watch them, was likely asked in countless homes around the country during the Globes telecast and at the proverbial water cooler the next day. Even if only a fraction of viewers go out and subscribe to Netflix, the numbers can be truly staggering for the company.

At $7.99 a month for a subscription, every 100,000 new subscribers (.5% of the direct Globes' nearly 20 million viewers) brings Netflix $799,000. Hang onto even half of those for 12 months and the company has brought in an extra $4.8 million, which is likely just the tip of the bucket for the actual economic boost Netflix received just by having its shows nominated.

Going after HBO

In many ways, the current Netflix model mirrors that of HBO, which the company acknowledges as its biggest long-term competitor on the investor relations pages of its website. "HBO bids against us on many original content projects.... HBO has global reach and a strengthening technology capacity," according to the document.

HBO, the first premium pay cable channel, began as an outlet for movies after their cinematic release, but before their video and network debuts. The company, which fell behind Netflix in total subscribers, according to a letter Netflix sent to subscribers in October 2013,  morphed from its early days when its original programming included low-end sitcoms like "1st & Ten" and "Dream On" and schlocky soft-core pornography including its "Real Sex" series and various documentaries about hookers, into a destination for top-quality original shows.

Programs like "The Sopranos," "Six Feet Under," Sex and the City," and special documentaries produced with A-listers including Tom Hanks and Steven Spielberg. These shows not only attracted audiences with viewership that sometimes rivaled top-rated network shows, they also garnered award nominations.

This heavy viewership and increased attention made the pay network hip and gave it water-cooler cachet. If you didn't subscribe to HBO, you weren't able to talk about Carrie Bradshaw's latest love failure or Tony Soprano's newest enemy. Having hot shows that people are discussing not only makes people want to subscribe, it keeps them paying the bill each month -- a lesson learned by HBO that is now being adopted not just by Netflix, but by Showtime, Cinemax, Starz, and Amazon.com's Prime video service. 

Beyond cable

As a stand-alone service, Netflix also has an advantage over HBO, which can only be subscribed to as part of a cable or satellite package. Netlix can be seen as an alternative to having a typical cable subscription -- something millennials have seemed especially open to.

According to a June 2013 report commissioned by the Pivot cable channel, "13% of 18-34 year-olds (8.6 million people) who already have broadband service are committed to a broadband-only existence."

The Golden Globes was a top ratings draw among this age group as, according to the Neilsen ratings service, the show ranked number one for the night among network primetime telecasts in women 18-34. It was also the top-rated among non-sports programs for all adults 18-34 and men 18-34.

There also seems to be some room to grow in original programming for Netflix with future Golden Globes and Emmy exposure as one of the carrots that makes the investment worthwhile. Netflix spent around $300 million on original content in 2013 and plans to double that in 2014, according to Chief Content Officer Ted Sarandos in an interview in Variety last October. "Overall, Netflix's spending on original content next year will still represent less than 10% of overall global content spending. About 40% of HBO's spending is on originals," Sarandos said, "so there's a big gap from where we are to where we could be."

So, the 2013 Golden Globes may just be the coming-out party for Netflix as a premium content partner with more nominations, wins, and free buzz-building publicity to look forward to in 2014.

The next step

Want to figure out how to profit on business analysis like this? The key is to learn how to turn business insights into portfolio gold by taking your first steps as an investor. Those who wait on the sidelines are missing out on huge gains and putting their financial futures in jeopardy. In our brand-new special report, "Your Essential Guide to Start Investing Today," The Motley Fool's personal-finance experts show you what you need to get started, and even gives you access to some stocks to buy first. Click here to get your copy today -- it's absolutely free.

Fool contributor Daniel Kline has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Netflix. The Motley Fool owns shares of Netflix. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information