The Case for Investing Everything in Stocks

Most novice investors should be 100% invested in stocks, Fool contributor Tim Beyers says in the following video.

Why? Two reasons. First, if you're fully committed to stocks you'll either need to sell a position to open a new one, or add new cash on a regular basis in order to buy new stocks. Second, you'll be more likely to dollar-cost average, which can reduce the risk of investing in volatile high-growth stocks.

Think of Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX  ) . The streaming sensation defied skeptics once more in reporting fourth-quarter revenue and earnings, which easily beat estimates. Further expansion in Europe is up next -- France and Germany, specifically, according to a recent report in The Wall Street Journal.

Sound good? Just remember that, right now, you'd be buying at north of $400 a share and within spitting distance of a 52-week high. That's dangerous when you consider that Netflix traded for less than half that -- or $159 a share -- last April. Building a position a step at a time via dollar-cost via averaging with new cash would allow you to gain exposure without putting your existing portfolio at risk, Tim says.

Now it's your turn to weigh in. What's your portfolio strategy? Which stocks are you dollar-cost averaging your way into? Please watch the video to get Tim's full take and then leave a comment to let us know whether you would buy, sell, or short Netflix stock at current prices.

Six stocks that could be the next Netflix
They said it couldn't be done. But David Gardner has proved them wrong time, and time, and time again with stock returns like 926%, 2,239%, and 4,371%. In fact, just recently one of his favorite stocks became a 100-bagger. And he's ready to do it again. You can uncover his scientific approach to crushing the market and his carefully chosen six picks for ultimate growth instantly, because he's making this premium report free for you today. Click here now for access.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (0)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 02, 2014, at 12:21 PM, davaidesign wrote:

    "That's dangerous when you consider that Netflix traded for less than half that -- or $159 a share -- last April."

    Isn't this anchoring? Who cares what it was trading for at some point in the past? The decision to buy is on today's price and assessment of value for that price.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2820174, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/25/2014 5:19:57 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement