3 Reasons Activision’s ‘Destiny’ Won’t Live Up to Bobby Kotick’s Expectations

Activision Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick recently claimed that its upcoming shooter Destiny will be the “best selling new video game IP history.” Here are three reasons he could be wrong.

Feb 12, 2014 at 10:19AM


Activision Blizzard (NASDAQ: ATVI) CEO Bobby Kotick recently made a grand claim that Destiny, the company's upcoming shooter from Halo creators Bungie, would be the "best selling new video game IP in history."

By now, most gamers and investors have learned to take Mr. Kotick's statements with a grain of salt. After all, this is the same man who aimed to "take the fun out of making video games" and wanted Activision to focus on games with "the potential to become $100 million franchises" so they could "be exploited every year across every platform."

However, to claim that Destiny will be the best selling "new video game IP in history" is a lofty claim even by Mr. Kotick's standards.

Let's evaluate the top three reasons that he believes that Destiny will be a record-shattering triumph for Activision Blizzard, and why I believe that all three reasons are based on faulty logic.

1. The Halo effect
Destiny's single biggest selling point is that it is considered the spiritual successor to Halo, the first person shooter franchise that defined the original Xbox and the Xbox 360.

Although the Halo franchise still marches on, the creators of the franchise, Bungie, only developed the original trilogy, Halo: ODST, and Halo:Reach.

Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) and Bungie parted ways in 2007, but Bungie still finished Halo 3: ODST in 2009 and Halo: Reach in 2010. Microsoft then handed the Halo franchise to its internal division 343 Industries, which released Halo 4 in 2012.



Units sold


Halo: Combat Evolved (2001, 2011)

Xbox, Xbox 360, PC

8.65 million

97% (Xbox)

Halo 2 (2004)

Xbox, PC

9.25 million

95% (Xbox)

Halo 3 (2007)

Xbox 360

11.87 million


Halo 3: ODST (2009)

Xbox 360

6.22 million


Halo: Reach (2010)

Xbox 360

9.52 million


Halo 4 (2012)

Xbox 360

8.93 million


Source: Vgchartz, Metacritic.

While sales of the Halo franchise remain robust after Bungie's departure, the series hit a clear peak with Halo 3 in 2007.


Halo 3. (Source: Ign.com)

This was due to two things -- the arrival of Activision's Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare in 2007, which sold 17.6 million copies, and rising competition in eye candy sci-fi shooters from newcomers like Electronic Arts' (NASDAQ:EA) Crysis (PC, 2007).

Therefore, Kotick's expectation that Destiny will simply pick up where Halo left off and form the base of a new Call of Duty-like franchise is far too optimistic.

As talented as the developers at Bungie are, there has been an unmistakable decline in Halo sales, and the market for first person shooters is as saturated as it has ever been.

2. The slippery definition of 'new' IPs
Mr. Kotick isn't the only person at Activision to claim that Destiny will be the best selling new IP in history -- the company's publishing branch CEO Eric Hirshberg recently made the same claim in a Feb. 7 report at GameSpot.

Sure, that bold claim makes for a nice quote, but neither Kotick nor Hirshberg have elaborated on what qualifies as a "new IP."

For example, Nintendo's (NASDAQOTH: NTDOY) Wii Sports, the top selling game of all time with 81.8 million units sold, was a new IP when it was bundled with the Wii in 2006. Halo was also a new IP when it arrived in 2001.

If we're simply looking at 2014 releases, games like Ubisoft's (NASDAQOTH:UBSFF) Watch Dogs, EA's Titanfall, Sony's (NYSE:SNE) The Order: 1886, and Microsoft's Sunset Overdrive are the more notable new IPs of the year.

Yet according to a January survey of 3,500 gamers conducted by GameSpot GameTrax in January, Destiny ranked fifth among the most anticipated games of 2014:



Aware of title

Plans to purchase*


Watch Dogs



Warner/CD Projekt

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt




Tom Clancy's The Division



Electronic Arts

Dragon Age: Inquisition



Activision Blizzard




Source: GameSpot GameTrax, January 2014. *Percentage of those aware of the title.

Two of the other top five titles -- Watch Dogs and The Division -- can be considered "new IPs," and both are more highly anticipated than Destiny. EA's Titanfall, which is widely considered Destiny's direct competitor, ranks a dismal 16th, with 67% of gamers aware of the title but only 30% planning to purchase it.

Watch Dogs Screenshot

Ubisoft's Watch Dogs is the most anticipated title of 2014.

Therefore, Destiny has to outsell both Watch Dogs and The Division to become the top-selling new IP of 2014. Moreover, Destiny has to achieve the absurd goal of outselling Wii Sports to actually make Kotick and Hirshberg's bold claims factually accurate.

A more reasonable, optimistic estimate of Destiny's sales would be closer to the 10 million to 15 million mark, based on past sales of Halo 4 (8.9 million) and Call of Duty: Ghosts (19 million).

3. Destiny can be 'exploited every year across every platform'
Last but not least, we should discuss Mr. Kotick's biggest problem -- if Destiny is a hit, he will inevitably push Bungie to release a new sequel every year on multiple platforms.

However, that's just not how Bungie works.

Bungie released a new Halo title once every three years, mainly for the Xbox and Xbox 360. One widely reported reason that Bungie left Microsoft was that Microsoft interefered with the game development cycle and continually pressured Bungie to pump out new Halo titles.

Now imagine what will happen when Kotick starts pressuring Bungie to pump out a new title annually for multiple platforms.

Activision has already had a controversial history with its top developers. In 2010, the company fired two founders of Infinity Ward, the original creators and developers of Call of Duty, over "breaches of contract and insubordination." The firings immediately resulted in 35 more resignations at the developer.

Although Activision bounced back from that fiasco by rebalancing the development load between Infinity Ward and the series' other developer, Treyarch, it was a validation for many gamers that Kotick was indeed determined to "take the fun out of making video games."

Therefore, Destiny's success could be a double-edged sword for Bungie -- it will prove that it can develop other great games besides Halo, but it will also face massive pressure from Activision, which could be a far less forgiving partner than Microsoft.

It's too late to turn back now, though -- Bungie's deal with Activision lasts for a whopping 10 years, from 2010 to 2020.

The bottom line
Don't get me wrong -- Destiny will likely be a commercial and critical hit, but I doubt that it will be the best selling IP in history, or even this year. Mr. Kotick's bold claim is simply a broad, hype-generating statement that can be interpreted in far too many ways.

What do you think, fellow gamers? Will Destiny be a blockbuster or a bomb? Let me know your thoughts in the comments section below!

Will Bobby Kotick's controversial decisions make average investors money?
Want to figure out how to profit from sales of top video game franchises like Call of Duty? The key is to learn how to turn business insights into portfolio gold by taking your first steps as an investor. Those who wait on the sidelines are missing out on huge gains and putting their financial futures in jeopardy. In our brand-new special report, "Your Essential Guide to Start Investing Today," The Motley Fool's personal finance experts show you what you need to get started, and even give you access to some stocks to buy first. Click here to get your copy today -- it's absolutely free.

Leo Sun has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Activision Blizzard. The Motley Fool owns shares of Activision Blizzard and Microsoft. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information

Compare Brokers