Is a New Marvel TV Show Based on Agent Carter a Good Idea?

With "Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D." still struggling to improve its ratings, is it the right time for an "Agent Carter" series based on the Marvel One-Shot?

Apr 3, 2014 at 10:33AM

When "Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D." from Disney's (NYSE:DIS) Marvel Studios was first announced, it seemed like the perfect way for Marvel Studios to capitalize on the success of films like The Avengers. A weekly view of the Marvel cinematic universe, from the point of view of the S.H.I.E.L.D. agents who investigate all of the strange happenings that we've seen in the movies? It was every Marvel fanboy's dream.

When the series premiered, though, it didn't seem to quite live up to a lot of people's expectations. During the first half of the season, the show was plagued with pacing issues and seemed to have problems balancing exposition and action. On top of that, much of what happened in the show seemed completely divorced from the larger Marvel universe that it was supposed to be a part of. While things have improved significantly in these regards, the show is still struggling to regain the audience that it started with.

Despite this, a second Marvel-based series may be in the works at ABC. While this new show could be a larger risk than "Agents," its different approach could also make it more of a hit.

Agent Carter
Based on the Marvel One-Shot short film that explored the life of Captain America: The First Avenger's Peggy Carter after the film, the new "Agent Carter" show would further detail Carter's career and the early days of S.H.I.E.L.D. as an organization. Actress Hayley Atwell would return as the titular Carter, while Dominic Cooper's Howard Stark would likely return as a recurring guest star. While other Captain America stars might occasionally return as well, it's unlikely that they would play a significant role in the series.

According to screenwriters Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely, a pilot script for the series has already been produced but the show has not been greenlit yet. The network supposedly liked the script, though, and there is a definite series idea in mind if it does move forward. Perhaps learning from some of "Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.'s" troubles, "Agent Carter" would have a much stronger focus.

A limited series?
Instead of being a full-season show, "Agent Carter" would reportedly run as a limited series that would begin in 1946 and focus on a single case or event per year. The season would run for 13 episodes or less, and the next season would jump forward to a new case in 1947.

This is the same format being used for the Disney/Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) "Defenders" collaboration. "Daredevil" and the other shows in that deal will each feature a 13-episode first season, building up to the five-episode "Defenders" miniseries that caps off the project. Disney likely sees a lot of potential in the limited-series format for its Marvel properties, so potentially riskier properties like "Agent Carter" could adopt it in the future.

Would it work?
The big question, of course, is whether people would tune in to a period piece set in the Marvel cinematic universe. While "Agent Carter" was well received as a short and a number of people called for it to be expanded to a series after its release, that popularity doesn't necessarily translate to blockbuster ratings.

With a limited-series format and a more dedicated focus than "Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.", however, "Agent Carter" has a lot of potential. It would cost less to hype a shorter series, and ABC could use it to fill gaps in its schedule while more popular shows are on hiatus. If it's successful, the network could even set up events in "Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D." or Marvel Studios films by introducing artifacts and other secrets that would show up again in the "future."

More importantly, ABC could use "Agent Carter" as an "event"-type series. By withholding new seasons until sweeps or scheduling it against weak shows on competing networks, ABC could score viewers (and advertisers) during the show's limited run that might otherwise be tuning in elsewhere.

What if it flops?
The biggest risk regarding "Agent Carter" is that it might have a harder time connecting with viewers who aren't Marvel fans or who haven't seen the original short. This could put ABC in a tricky position since it would then have two Marvel-themed shows struggling for viewers and might make some viewers question the direction that the network is taking.

Fortunately, the limited-series format would make it easier for ABC to let a preliminary season run its course and opt not to pick it up if it never finds an audience. If it serves as a fill-in while a more popular show takes a break, the network could hedge its bets in case it doesn't take off. While viewers might drop off, the return of a more popular show could draw those viewers back in.

Will 'Agent Carter' get a pilot order?
If the upcoming Captain America: The Winter Soldier does well at the box office, ABC may try to capitalize on that success by greenlighting "Agent Carter" soon after. Even if the order doesn't come then, the show has too much potential for it to not get a green light sooner or later. 

The bigger issue will be whether ABC can effectively fit the show into its schedule and use the limited-series format to draw an audience. With a limited number of episodes and a single overarching storyline for each season, ABC will need to handle its scheduling better than "Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D." if it wants "Agent Carter" to succeed.

Are you ready to profit from this $14.4 trillion revolution?
Let's face it, every investor wants to get in on revolutionary ideas before they hit it big. Like buying PC-maker Dell in the late 1980s, before the consumer computing boom. Or purchasing stock in e-commerce pioneer in the late 1990s, when it was nothing more than an upstart online bookstore. The problem is, most investors don't understand the key to investing in hyper-growth markets. The real trick is to find a small-cap "pure-play" and then watch as it grows in EXPLOSIVE lockstep with its industry. Our expert team of equity analysts has identified one stock that's poised to produce rocket-ship returns with the next $14.4 TRILLION industry. Click here to get the full story in this eye-opening report.

John Casteele has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Netflix and Walt Disney. The Motley Fool owns shares of Netflix and Walt Disney. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information