The FCC Intervenes in Cable, Should You Buy?

The FCC voted to limit “collusion” among stations that advertise on pay-TV, which could lower advertising costs and ultimately boost big cable companies' profits.

Apr 10, 2014 at 10:05AM

The Fcc Commision
The FCC board, Chairman Tom Wheeler is center. Photo: Bloomberg

The Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, voted last week on new regulations to limit "joint sales agreements," or JSAs. These agreements give two stations the ability to team up and negotiate ad sales as one unit. This action will effectively target a broadcaster that owns a particular station, but sells advertising for another station in the same city. The supporters of these new regulations hope to eliminate the possibility of one corporation dominating the local market by becoming the only company that exchanges advertising space for all stations.

This new rule has come as a blow to broadcasting companies such as Sinclair Broadcast Group (NASDAQ:SBGI), which has used JSAs for years to circumvent rules which govern how much of a market one single broadcaster can own. Sinclair's stock took a hit on the news, as the FCC has given the company a two-year time limit to dismantle its current agreements in this area. However, the decision could be a more long-term boost to cable TV providers such as Comcast (NASDAQ:CMSCA) and Time Warner Cable (NYSE:TWC) that could benefit by having lower costs since the broadcasters will have less negotiation power.

Cable rates have skyrocketed recently
JSAs have become commonplace in the last few years as smaller stations team up with bigger stations to jointly sell their advertising space. Supporters of the practice say that without the help from the bigger stations, these smaller local stations would have a hard time getting adequate compensation for their advertising space and they could go out of business.

Rising Pay Tv Monthly Rates
Graphic source: Gigiam

By some estimates, the joint agreements have caused fees to skyrocket from $28 million in 2005 to $2.4 billion in 2012, according to reports from the FCC. These cable rate hikes have not gone unnoticed by consumers, and cable TV providers don't want to take the blame for these rate increases.


Tom Wheeler

Thomas "Tom" Wheeler, chairman of the Federal Communications Commission. Photo: Bloomberg

Will this regulation finally mean lower cable prices?
"Chairman Wheeler is taking steps to protect consumers and preserve local broadcasting by preventing the erosion of competition in local broadcast markets," the FCC said. "These steps will curtail practices that have put upward pressure on cable prices." Supporters suggest that lower prices paid by pay-TV providers will mean lower cable and pay-TV rates for consumers.

However, not everyone agrees that the individual consumer will benefit from these changes. "The real loser will be local TV viewers, because this proposal will kill jobs, chill investment in broadcasting and reduce meaningful minority programming and ownership opportunities," said Gordon Smith, president of the National Association of Broadcasters, or NAB, insisting that instead the changes would benefit "big cable companies who want less competition for advertising in local markets."

Investors' Foolish takeaway: Where are the long-term profits?
Less flexibility in advertising negotiations will hurt broadcasters such as Sinclair Broadcasting Group. However, lower costs for pay-TV could mean better profits for the big cable providers such as Comcast and Time Warner. As a consumer, whether or not this will trickle down to lower cable rates is yet to be seen. As an investor, this could be a boost for big cable.

Your cable company is scared, but you can get rich
There's $2.2 trillion out there to be had. Currently, cable grabs a big piece of it. That won't last. And when cable falters, three companies are poised to benefit. Click here for their names. Hint: They're not Netflix, Google, and Apple. 


Editor's note: A previous version of this article misstated the American Cable Association's view on JSA's. The Fool regrets the error.

Bradley Seth McNew has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends and Netflix. The Motley Fool owns shares of and Netflix. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information