The Coming Netflix Price Increase Is No Big Deal

Early in 2013, Netflix  (NASDAQ: NFLX  ) CEO Reed Hastings told investors that the company was still facing a year-and-a-half of probation following its disastrous mid-2011 price increase. Investors have been eager for the extra revenue and earnings a price increase would generate. However, Hastings worried that if Netflix attempted to raise prices again, it would bring back bad memories, leading to more subscriber backlash.

Netflix is almost off "probation," and it's ready to raise prices.

The probation period is almost over, and Netflix management does not seem very worried about losing subscriber loyalty anymore. As a result, Netflix plans a "one or two dollar increase" for new members starting later this quarter. However, this price increase probably won't have a significant impact on Netflix's finances until 2016.

Prices going up... slowly
In January, Netflix increased its monthly price in Ireland by 1 euro. This served as a test of sorts for a potential increase in the vastly larger U.S. market. In Ireland, Netflix grandfathered in existing members at the old subscription price for two years. At the time, Netflix indicated that it would extend the grandfathering tactic to the U.S. if it chose to raise prices later in 2014.

Grandfathering existing members is a clever move. A straight price increase could give customers the impression that Netflix doesn't value them very much. By contrast, grandfathering gives current subscribers lots of time to adjust to the new pricing scheme while rewarding them for their loyalty with a (temporarily) lower price.

According to Netflix, the Ireland price increase went more or less as planned. With current subscribers protected against the increase until 2016, it's not surprising that there was no backlash.

Small benefit for now
The main benefit to Netflix of grandfathering current users is that it will hopefully prevent an uptick in churn (the monthly cancellation rate) when prices go up. In fact, in the short term, this policy could reduce churn. Customers might be more reluctant to cancel if they feel like they're getting a "good deal" now and would have to pay the higher rate if they canceled and rejoined.

On the flip side, Netflix will not see much of an impact to its revenue or earnings from higher prices until the grandfathering period expires. Netflix had nearly 36 million subscribers as of the end of last month, and it has added about 6.5 million subscribers in the last six months.

A price increase will help Netflix pay for expensive content deals.

Thus, the number of current subscribers paying the old price will far outweigh the number of subscribers paying the new price for quite some time. Based on the two-year grandfathering period used in Ireland, current Netflix subscribers will probably pay today's rate until sometime in 2016.

This timing would coincide nicely with the beginning of Netflix's pricey deal for the pay-TV rights to Disney movies. In the meantime, Netflix will have to rely on good old-fashioned subscriber growth to increase its margins.

Foolish final thoughts
The coming Netflix price increase will generate plenty of headlines in the financial press. That said, it isn't likely to have a significant impact on the company's financial performance. The decision to grandfather all current Netflix subscribers means that most users will keep paying the current price for another year or two.

The company's rapid march to profitability in international markets is a much more significant development from an investing perspective. However, this news may fly beneath the radar given the intense consumer interest in Netflix's upcoming price increase.

Your cable company is scared, but you can get rich
You know cable's going away. But do you know how to profit from the Internet TV revolution? There's $2.2 trillion out there to be had. Today, cable grabs a big piece of Americans' entertainment budgets, but that won't last. When cable falters, three companies are poised to benefit -- and Netflix isn't one of them! Click here for their names.

 


Read/Post Comments (5) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On April 22, 2014, at 1:45 PM, CoffeeClub wrote:

    Adam,what's your take on AEREO INC. Supreme Court Case today against CBS? If they win, and don't have to pay re-transmission charges, $8 monthly will buy you "free" TV when you want to watch it with their remote dime size antennas and DVRs which can access network TV on web-based devices like tablets and ABC ,Cable and others and future competition for NFLX?I love NFLX but make take position off the shelf until we see if copyright transmission falls to consumer wishes.

  • Report this Comment On April 22, 2014, at 2:04 PM, aguadaboca wrote:

    Isn't this technology disruptive to the whole industry and the kind of event that the Gardner brothers warn that a strong growth company must be adverse to building a large moat?

  • Report this Comment On April 23, 2014, at 1:38 AM, suthanalley wrote:

    Netflix management planning too increase the fees by roughly $1 or $2 but the two major reasons that make us believe it will not hurt the company's existing subscriber base is http://goo.gl/TaLD4i

  • Report this Comment On April 23, 2014, at 12:34 PM, TMFGemHunter wrote:

    @CoffeeClub: I've been following the Aereo case with interest for about a year now. I don't think an Aereo win would hurt Netflix, because it makes cord-cutting far easier. I don't think that Netflix, Amazon, Hulu, or any combination thereof is a really satisfactory substitute for cable TV for most people. Aereo disrupts that because you get access to some top live TV channels and a DVR for not much money. Combine that with Netflix or one of the other services and you have a decent low-cost cable alternative.

    If Aereo were available where I live, there's a good chance I wouldn't be subscribing to cable. I do like being able to watch my local sports teams and some cable stations like TNT/USA/ESPN. But frankly, most of my TV watching is network TV, and the main reason I got cable is because I can't get a decent TV signal from CBS, FOX, or NBC where I live.

    The catch here is that I think there's a good chance one or more of the TV networks will try to go all-cable if Aereo wins. I think a lot of people in Congress would try to strong-arm them to stay free and over-the-air, but I think the profit motivation would win out.

    An all-cable CBS could probably extract an extra $1-2/month across 100 million pay-TV households. That's $1-$2 billion or more in "free" money to offset any lost advertising revenue from having a somewhat smaller audience.

    @aguadaboca: I don't understand what you're referring to in your comment. Could you elaborate?

    Adam

  • Report this Comment On April 23, 2014, at 1:20 PM, GeeBeeNC wrote:

    Interesting that gransfathering is opposite the strategy of introductory pricing used by the dish and cable companies.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2923814, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/25/2014 5:27:31 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement