Pandora Media Inc: Spending Money to Lose Money

Pandora managed to boost its revenue during the first quarter by greatly increasing spending, and with the number of active users stagnating, the company is facing some serious challenges.

Apr 29, 2014 at 2:30PM

The explosive rise in shares of Pandora Media (NYSE:P) over the past 18 months has been somewhat perplexing. Pandora has yet to turn a profit, its expenses have routinely grown faster than revenue, and competition has only gotten fiercer. Since hitting a high of $40 per share in March, the stock has collapsed to the low $20s, in part due to the most recent earnings report. While rapid growth in users and revenue has been the driver of Pandora's stock in the past, slowing growth and stagnation in active users seems to have convinced the market that profits may matter after all.

A shift in spending
One good piece of news that came out of Pandora's first-quarter earnings report is that content acquisition costs grew more slowly than revenue. Advertising revenue grew by 45% year-over-year, with total revenue jumping by 69% thanks to a near-tripling of subscription revenue, compared to just 26% growth in content acquisition costs. This shows that Pandora is doing a better job of monetizing its users, and that's certainly a good thing.

The problem with this story is that operating expenses rose by 72%, with sales and marketing spend increasing by 63% and general and administrative costs nearly doubling. So while gross profit rose considerably, the massive increase in spending led to a $29 million loss during the quarter. This is slightly better than the $38 million loss during the same period last year, but Pandora was still squarely in the red.

It seems that this increase in sales and marketing was the main revenue driver, because the number of active users actually declined compared to the previous quarter, and it's only up 8% year-over-year. At the end of the fourth quarter of 2013, Pandora had 76.2 million active users. This number declined to 75.3 million at the end of the first quarter of 2014, a bad sign for a company that has relied on rapid growth to quell concerns about lack of profitability.

Without new users, better monetization of existing users is the only way to grow revenue, and that has a limit. Of course, Pandora may be able to reverse this active user trend in the following quarters, possibly by expanding to new markets, but with all of the alternatives that consumers have, it's very possible that the company has hit its peak, at least in the markets that it currently serves.

What, exactly, makes Pandora different?
There are a litany of options facing the consumer when it comes to music streaming services, and while Pandora has the largest user base, the company still has yet to prove that it can stream music profitably. Pandora was the first Internet radio service to go mainstream, and that first-mover advantage helped the company get to where it is today. But when a company that's valued at nearly $5 billion can't seem to turn a dime of profit, even with more than 75 million active users, investors should be wary.

What does Pandora do differently than every other music streaming company out there? That's the most important question that investors should be asking themselves, because without a clear differentiating factor, Pandora will never turn a serious profit. What does Pandora do differently than Spotify, a company that is rumored to be planning an IPO for later this year? What does Pandora do differently than Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), which launched its iTunes Radio service last year?

iTunes Radio has the advantage of being tightly integrated with iOS, and along with Siri integration and compatibility with music purchased from iTunes, iTunes Radio is a very serious competitor on Apple devices. 11 million users tried iTunes Radio during its first week of availability, and while it still is nowhere close to the size of Pandora, more competition is not a good thing for the company.

All of these services work the same way. Royalties are paid per song played, and revenue is generated from both advertising and subscriptions. All of them offer a large number of songs, although Pandora has a fairly small selection, and all of them try to create personalized playlists based on user preferences.

This is one area where Pandora has the chance to be better than all the rest. Being able to play songs that users want to listen to, based on the billions of user interactions that the company has been analyzing since its launch in 2000, is the one thing that Pandora can really do differently. And based on Pandora's huge Internet radio market share, the company seems to know what it's doing.

But is this advantage sustainable? A competitive advantage is nice, but a sustainable competitive advantage is what every company is striving for, and what very few achieve. The fact that Pandora hasn't been able to turn a profit even though it is the dominate Internet radio company is not a good sign. The problem is that Pandora doesn't have any power over the royalties that it pays. This is the same problem that every Internet radio company faces, and without the ability to control the largest expense, I'm not sure how any of them expect to turn a meaningful profit.

The bottom line
Pandora's is facing a stagnating user base, and while revenue rose considerably in the quarter, it was on the back of an enormous increase in spending. Pandora's biggest problem is not the competition, but its business model, and unless the royalty rates that Pandora pays are reduced, there doesn't seem to be a path to profitability. 

The next great growth story is here
If you thought the iPod, the iPhone, and the iPad were amazing, just wait until you see this. One hundred of Apple's top engineers are busy building one in a secret lab. And an ABI Research report predicts 485 million of them could be sold over the next decade. But you can invest in it right now... for just a fraction of the price of AAPL stock. Click here to get the full story in this eye-opening new report.

Timothy Green has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Apple and Pandora Media. The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple and Pandora Media. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information

Compare Brokers