Why the FCC Might Intervene in the Netflix-Comcast Deal

The Federal Communications Commission wants to know how much Netflix  (NASDAQ: NFLX  ) is paying Comcast  (NASDAQ: CMCSA  ) and Verizon  (NYSE: VZ  ) in so-called "paid peering" agreements. These deals -- which became legal in January when a court struck down the net neutrality rules that forced all Internet traffic to be treated equally -- give the digital streaming company a promise of better service for its customers.

The FCC asked for and received copies of the agreements but Chairman Tom Wheeler has not pledged to take any action nor is he releasing them to the public. Currently, Ars Technica reported, he is only checking into whether consumers are actually getting the Internet access they are paying for. In many cases that has not been true for Netflix customers who have had to deal with slow access on many ISPs.

The digital streaming content company tracks ISP speeds in the United States. As you can see below as of January -- when it became at least quasi-legal to charge for decent access -- performance was poor on a number of ISPs -- including Comcast and Verizon.

In making deals with Comcast and Verizon Netflix essentially is paying tor a direct connection to each ISP's users. The FCC, which currently supports formally legalizing these deals, appears to be wavering.

Netflix has been vehemently opposed to these deals even as it has made them in order to protect the user experience of its customers. The FCC had squarely been on the side of the cable industry -- not the public it supposedly represents. That has changed a little as a growing mainstream media tide (including HBO's John Oliver, which I wrote about here) has alerted people that the end of net neutrality could be very bad for everyone who does not own a cable company.

Now, Wheeler and the FCC have to at least pretend they are watching out for us regular folks and not simply doing the bidding of the Internet service providers and cable companies (who Wheeler used to work for as a lobbyist).

"Consumers pay their ISP and they pay content providers like Hulu, Netflix or Amazon.... Consumers must get what they pay for. As the consumer's representative we need to know what is going on," Wheeler said after an FCC meeting Friday. "I have therefore directed the Commission staff to obtain the information we need to understand precisely what is happening in order to understand whether consumers are being harmed."

Those might be the words of a man who was caught trying to pull one over on the public, but doing the right thing for the wrong reasons can still be good.

Does paying help?

After the paid peerage deals were made between Comcast and Verizon and Netflix, service improved for Comcast users but not for Verizon's, according to Netflix's May speed chart. When the Comcast deal was struck in late February, ARS Technica reported, Netflix speeds became immediately better. Since the Verizon deal was made in late April, using Netflix has become an even slower experience for its customers.

"Verizon FiOS is down two slots and now ranks behind DSL providers Frontier and Windstream," Netflix posted on its blog after releasing its monthly speed index.

In the U.S., Netflix performance on Verizon FiOS dropped from 1.99Mbps in April to 1.90Mbps in May, and performance on Verizon DSL dropped from 1.08Mbps to 1.05Mbps. The drops are small, but they show that the paid peering deal didn't make any immediate impact.

The Wall Street Journal reported that Verizon blames its poor performance on time.

Verizon said it plans to fulfill the terms of its agreement with Netflix over the next few months, according to the paper.

"We are working on the first 13 cities, and we do plan to have everything done in 2014," said Verizon spokesman Bob Elek. "All of this kerfuffle that is going on isn't affecting that."

Netflix certainly does not seem happy about the Verizon response -- it has been delivering messages to Verizon customers blaming the ISP for slow speeds. Verizon responded to Netflix's actions by sending the company a cease and desist letter, which I discussed with fellow Fools Jason Hellmann and Jake Mann on a recent edition of the Business Take videocast.

Netflix is paying for better access for its customers and Verizon still can't deliver it. That does not bode well for a future in which the Internet becomes a gated community where companies must pay ISPs for better service for its customers.

What is at stake here?

Net neutrality protected consumers. It democratized the Internet and made it so all traffic -- be it a Netflix video, a speech by the pope, or the most offensive porn imaginable is treated the same way. If the proposed rules, which allow ISPs to essentially create slow and (paid) fast lanes on the Internet, go through then the very nature of the Internet will change.

It's not simply about whether a large volume player like Netflix gets treated well. It's also about how any potential competitor to the service fares. Under the FCC's proposed rules, paid peerage would be legal as long as the same deals are made available to any company willing to pay. That sounds good but it puts a toll charge on being able to offer most customers decent streaming speeds and start-ups, or even established companies may not be able to pay.

And, of course, it's hard to imagine that any additional fees a company pays won't in some way be passed on to users. That means you will pay for Internet access and then pay again to support paid peerage deals forced by a service that already takes your money.

It's laughable that Verizon allegedly ransomed Netflix into making a deal by offering such a poor experience to the streaming service's customers that it had to pay but then couldn't deliver faster speeds. 

ISPs saw the opportunity to add a rich new revenue stream and they are clearly willing to overlook the fact that their customers are paying them for access to the whole Internet -- not selective parts of it. 

It's good to see the FCC stepping in even if the group's motives are hardly pure. Someone needs to protect the American public. It's not about whether you have glitches watching Orange Is the New Black. It's about whether the Internet remains a public highway open to any and all or a toll road that some can't afford to travel.

Are you ready for this $14.4 trillion revolution?

Have you ever dreamed of traveling back in time and telling your younger self to invest in Apple? Or to load up on at its IPO, and then just keep holding? We haven't mastered time travel, but there is a way to get out ahead of the next big thing. The secret is to find a small-cap "pure-play" and then watch as the industry -- and your company -- enjoy those same explosive returns. Our team of equity analysts has identified one stock that's ready for stunning profits with the growth of a $14.4 TRILLION industry. You can't travel back in time, but you can set up your future. Click here for the whole story in our eye-opening report.

Read/Post Comments (5) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 17, 2014, at 11:13 AM, 24penny wrote:

    These deals are as old as the internet. Not just recently made legal. This has NOTHING to do with net neutrality. All about capacity of the connections.

    I have to say that the internet was not built with the intention of being a quality video delivery medium. Netflix and others are repurposing it to suit their unscalable business models.

  • Report this Comment On June 17, 2014, at 1:57 PM, WirelessDude wrote:

    How about asking how much we pay for access to the Internet? They advertise speed not limits and we are limited by the franchise agreements signed by government officials. This is stupid. I pay for for access with little competition and now what they want to do is charge me and the sender for access and speed.

    If they are going to charge the sender, then don't charge me. And if they want this change in the business model, then acquire the right of way fiber and open it to complete market competition.

  • Report this Comment On June 17, 2014, at 3:44 PM, kparker wrote:

    @ 24penny,

    I cant help but feel you work for one of the ISP's when you spout such nonsense. I wonder what you know about TCP/IP and the limits imposed by various technologies. Its a clear attempt by cable companies to combat innovative competitiveness. Why compete with Netflix if I can charge them fees until I recap lost revenue and then some? Net neutrality supports competitiveness, and that is the one thing that consumers can count on for better products. Science would tell you that humans only exist in their current state because of competition. Just another example of the good competition brings.

  • Report this Comment On June 18, 2014, at 12:57 AM, sliderw wrote:


    If the internet is never to be used except for its originally intended purpose, then there would be no innovation on the internet, which would be a terrible thing.

  • Report this Comment On June 18, 2014, at 1:00 AM, sliderw wrote:


    The cable systems were never intended to carry internet traffic. So what do you say?

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2996623, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/31/2015 4:06:25 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Daniel B. Kline

Daniel B. Kline is an accomplished writer and editor who has worked for the Microsoft's Finance app and The Boston Globe, where he wrote for the paper and ran the business desk. His latest book "Worst Ideas Ever" (Skyhorse) can be purchased at bookstores everywhere.

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 16,568.55 -74.46 -0.45%
S&P 500 1,977.09 -11.78 -0.59%
NASD 4,786.49 -41.83 -0.87%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

8/31/2015 3:50 PM
CMCSA $56.45 Down -0.33 -0.58%
Comcast Corp CAPS Rating: ***
NFLX $115.35 Down -2.28 -1.94%
Netflix CAPS Rating: ***
VZ $46.06 Down -0.01 -0.02%
Verizon Communicat… CAPS Rating: ****