Can Universal’s Dracula and Mummy Reboots Achieve ‘Avengers’-Type Success?

Universal plans to unite its classic monsters into an Avengers-like team of “superheroes.”

Jul 22, 2014 at 10:33AM

Comcast's (NASDAQ:CMCSA) Universal Studios has a bold answer to the comic book film universes that Disney (NYSE:DIS), Time Warner (NYSE:TWX), Fox (NASDAQ:FOX), and Sony (NYSE: SNE) have been building. Instead of assembling teams of Marvel or DC comic book characters, Universal intends to reboot classic movie monsters and assemble them in an Avengers-like film.

The goal is to reboot the classic "Universal Monsters" characters -- Dracula, the Mummy, Bride of Frankenstein, the Wolf Man, the Invisible Man, and Creature from the Black Lagoon, among others -- into modern-day protagonists through individual films, then bring them together into a cohesive cinematic universe.

The sweeping effort will be overseen by Alex Kurtzman, the co-writer of Star Trek: Into Darkness and The Amazing Spider-Man 2, and Chris Morgan, who wrote the last three Fast and Furious films. The universe will launch with two new films -- Dracula Untold, which hits theaters on Oct. 17, and a reboot of The Mummy, which will arrive on April 22, 2016. A Van Helsing reboot, which will star and be produced by Tom Cruise, is expected to follow.


Dracula Untold. Source: Universal.

This ambitious plan could generate more predictable revenues for Universal, but it could also be very hard to pull off. Classic Universal monsters lack the guaranteed box office appeal of Spider-Man, Batman, or the Avengers. The films will also require pitch perfect writing and direction to prevent a team-up of Dracula, the Mummy, and the Wolf Man from devolving into an unintentionally hilarious monster mash.

Why Universal Monsters could succeed
Universal's previous attempts to launch "modern" versions of their classic horror characters have been fairly profitable (with the exception of The Wolfman), but critical reception has ranged from poor to mediocre.


Production budget

Global box office

Rotten Tomatoes

The Mummy (1999)

$80 million

$416 million


The Mummy Returns (2001)

$98 million

$433 million


Van Helsing (2004)

$160 million

$300 million


The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor (2008)

$145 million

$401 million


The Wolfman (2010)

$150 million

$140 million


Source: Box Office Mojo, Rotten Tomatoes

There is clearly a market for these reboots, and better writing, clearer direction, and multi-picture contracts for the stars could help these new films last longer than these earlier attempts.

The concept of classic literary and film characters teaming up has also proven successful in the past. Fox's League of Extraordinary Gentlemen -- based on a graphic novel that assembled Mr. Hyde, Dorian Gray, Tom Sawyer, Mina Harker, Captain Nemo, and Allan Quatermain into an "Avengers"-like team -- was commercially successful, grossing $179 million worldwide on a budget of $79 million in 2003.

More recently, CBS (NYSE: CBS)/Showtime's Penny Dreadful, which was recently renewed for a second season, pulls together vampires, Van Helsing, Dr. Frankenstein, and Dorian Gray in Victorian England.

Penny Dreadful

Dr. Frankenstein and his "creation" in Penny Dreadful. Source: Showtime.

Meanwhile, Disney's Maleficent, which grossed $697 million worldwide on a budget of $180 million, proves that there is a strong market for films starring fantastic villains. On top of that, Lions Gate's (NYSE:LGF) Twilight series, which grossed $3.3 billion over the course of five films, proves that there is still a fiercely loyal market for vampires and werewolves played by handsome leading men.

Why Universal Monsters could fall apart
The biggest flaw with Universal's plan is that classic movie monsters simply aren't as marketable as Marvel's heroes. Ask any kid who he would rather see -- Dracula or Iron Man -- and the problem becomes painfully obvious. Among adults, portrayals of comic book heroes in films still stoke passionate debates. The same can't be said about Frankenstein or Wolfman.

The second problem is that it can be tough to strike a balance between family-friendly fare and gothic darkness with classic movie monsters.

For example, Universal's Mummy reboot has already swapped directors twice. Andres Muschetti recently left the film after his "darker" vision for Mummy clashed with Universal's idea of a more family-friendly blockbuster, according to The Wrap. Muschetti succeeded Len Wiseman, the director of Underworld and Total Recall, after he stepped down last year.

In addition, Lions Gate's I, Frankenstein -- a recent attempt to turn the classic monster into a superhero -- completely bombed, grossing only $71 million on a budget of $65 million (a loss after marketing costs) and earning an abysmal 4% at Rotten Tomatoes.

I Frankenstein

I, Frankenstein completely missed the mark. Source: Lions Gate.

Those problems highlight how tough it is to strike the right balance between being a "horror" film and a family-oriented one that ties into a larger comic book-like universe.

The Foolish takeaway
In conclusion, Universal's idea to reboot and rebrand its classic horror characters is interesting, and it could become a profitable addition to its top ongoing and upcoming franchises, which include Fast and Furious, Despicable Me, and Jurassic World.

But it could also be tough to get audiences excited about these dusty old characters again, and it's going take a very talented creative team to unite these characters in the same film without it feeling like a goofy parody akin to Sony/Columbia's Hotel Transylvania.

If Dracula Untold, the Mummy, and Van Helsing do well at the box office, Universal could release a schedule of "theatrical phases," just like Marvel and Disney. That would give Comcast investors a much clearer picture of the projected growth of Universal (NBCUniversal Filmed Entertainment), which accounted for 9% of the company's top line last year.

So what you think, fellow film fans? Is Universal's "Monsters" idea the best or worst idea ever? Let me know in the comments section below!

Is this Warren Buffett's worst nightmare?
At the recent Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting, Warren Buffett admitted this emerging technology is threatening his biggest cash-cow. While Buffett shakes in his billionaire-boots, only a few investors are embracing this new market which experts say will be worth over $2 trillion. Find out how you can cash in on this technology before the crowd catches on, by jumping onto one company that could get you the biggest piece of the action. Click here to access a FREE investor alert on the company we're calling the "brains behind" the technology.


Leo Sun owns shares of Walt Disney. The Motley Fool recommends Lions Gate Entertainment and Walt Disney. The Motley Fool owns shares of Walt Disney. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information