Can Universal’s Dracula and Mummy Reboots Achieve ‘Avengers’-Type Success?

Universal plans to unite its classic monsters into an Avengers-like team of “superheroes.”

Jul 22, 2014 at 10:33AM

Comcast's (NASDAQ:CMCSA) Universal Studios has a bold answer to the comic book film universes that Disney (NYSE:DIS), Time Warner (NYSE:TWX), Fox (NASDAQ:FOX), and Sony (NYSE: SNE) have been building. Instead of assembling teams of Marvel or DC comic book characters, Universal intends to reboot classic movie monsters and assemble them in an Avengers-like film.

The goal is to reboot the classic "Universal Monsters" characters -- Dracula, the Mummy, Bride of Frankenstein, the Wolf Man, the Invisible Man, and Creature from the Black Lagoon, among others -- into modern-day protagonists through individual films, then bring them together into a cohesive cinematic universe.

The sweeping effort will be overseen by Alex Kurtzman, the co-writer of Star Trek: Into Darkness and The Amazing Spider-Man 2, and Chris Morgan, who wrote the last three Fast and Furious films. The universe will launch with two new films -- Dracula Untold, which hits theaters on Oct. 17, and a reboot of The Mummy, which will arrive on April 22, 2016. A Van Helsing reboot, which will star and be produced by Tom Cruise, is expected to follow.


Dracula Untold. Source: Universal.

This ambitious plan could generate more predictable revenues for Universal, but it could also be very hard to pull off. Classic Universal monsters lack the guaranteed box office appeal of Spider-Man, Batman, or the Avengers. The films will also require pitch perfect writing and direction to prevent a team-up of Dracula, the Mummy, and the Wolf Man from devolving into an unintentionally hilarious monster mash.

Why Universal Monsters could succeed
Universal's previous attempts to launch "modern" versions of their classic horror characters have been fairly profitable (with the exception of The Wolfman), but critical reception has ranged from poor to mediocre.


Production budget

Global box office

Rotten Tomatoes

The Mummy (1999)

$80 million

$416 million


The Mummy Returns (2001)

$98 million

$433 million


Van Helsing (2004)

$160 million

$300 million


The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor (2008)

$145 million

$401 million


The Wolfman (2010)

$150 million

$140 million


Source: Box Office Mojo, Rotten Tomatoes

There is clearly a market for these reboots, and better writing, clearer direction, and multi-picture contracts for the stars could help these new films last longer than these earlier attempts.

The concept of classic literary and film characters teaming up has also proven successful in the past. Fox's League of Extraordinary Gentlemen -- based on a graphic novel that assembled Mr. Hyde, Dorian Gray, Tom Sawyer, Mina Harker, Captain Nemo, and Allan Quatermain into an "Avengers"-like team -- was commercially successful, grossing $179 million worldwide on a budget of $79 million in 2003.

More recently, CBS (NYSE: CBS)/Showtime's Penny Dreadful, which was recently renewed for a second season, pulls together vampires, Van Helsing, Dr. Frankenstein, and Dorian Gray in Victorian England.

Penny Dreadful

Dr. Frankenstein and his "creation" in Penny Dreadful. Source: Showtime.

Meanwhile, Disney's Maleficent, which grossed $697 million worldwide on a budget of $180 million, proves that there is a strong market for films starring fantastic villains. On top of that, Lions Gate's (NYSE:LGF) Twilight series, which grossed $3.3 billion over the course of five films, proves that there is still a fiercely loyal market for vampires and werewolves played by handsome leading men.

Why Universal Monsters could fall apart
The biggest flaw with Universal's plan is that classic movie monsters simply aren't as marketable as Marvel's heroes. Ask any kid who he would rather see -- Dracula or Iron Man -- and the problem becomes painfully obvious. Among adults, portrayals of comic book heroes in films still stoke passionate debates. The same can't be said about Frankenstein or Wolfman.

The second problem is that it can be tough to strike a balance between family-friendly fare and gothic darkness with classic movie monsters.

For example, Universal's Mummy reboot has already swapped directors twice. Andres Muschetti recently left the film after his "darker" vision for Mummy clashed with Universal's idea of a more family-friendly blockbuster, according to The Wrap. Muschetti succeeded Len Wiseman, the director of Underworld and Total Recall, after he stepped down last year.

In addition, Lions Gate's I, Frankenstein -- a recent attempt to turn the classic monster into a superhero -- completely bombed, grossing only $71 million on a budget of $65 million (a loss after marketing costs) and earning an abysmal 4% at Rotten Tomatoes.

I Frankenstein

I, Frankenstein completely missed the mark. Source: Lions Gate.

Those problems highlight how tough it is to strike the right balance between being a "horror" film and a family-oriented one that ties into a larger comic book-like universe.

The Foolish takeaway
In conclusion, Universal's idea to reboot and rebrand its classic horror characters is interesting, and it could become a profitable addition to its top ongoing and upcoming franchises, which include Fast and Furious, Despicable Me, and Jurassic World.

But it could also be tough to get audiences excited about these dusty old characters again, and it's going take a very talented creative team to unite these characters in the same film without it feeling like a goofy parody akin to Sony/Columbia's Hotel Transylvania.

If Dracula Untold, the Mummy, and Van Helsing do well at the box office, Universal could release a schedule of "theatrical phases," just like Marvel and Disney. That would give Comcast investors a much clearer picture of the projected growth of Universal (NBCUniversal Filmed Entertainment), which accounted for 9% of the company's top line last year.

So what you think, fellow film fans? Is Universal's "Monsters" idea the best or worst idea ever? Let me know in the comments section below!

Is this Warren Buffett's worst nightmare?
At the recent Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting, Warren Buffett admitted this emerging technology is threatening his biggest cash-cow. While Buffett shakes in his billionaire-boots, only a few investors are embracing this new market which experts say will be worth over $2 trillion. Find out how you can cash in on this technology before the crowd catches on, by jumping onto one company that could get you the biggest piece of the action. Click here to access a FREE investor alert on the company we're calling the "brains behind" the technology.


Leo Sun owns shares of Walt Disney. The Motley Fool recommends Lions Gate Entertainment and Walt Disney. The Motley Fool owns shares of Walt Disney. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

1 Key Step to Get Rich

Our mission at The Motley Fool is to help the world invest better. Whether that’s helping people overcome their fear of stocks all the way to offering clear and successful guidance on complicated-sounding options trades, we can help.

Feb 1, 2016 at 4:54PM

To be perfectly clear, this is not a get-rich action that my Foolish colleagues and I came up with. But we wouldn't argue with the approach.

A 2015 Business Insider article titled, "11 websites to bookmark if you want to get rich" rated The Motley Fool as the #1 place online to get smarter about investing.

"The Motley Fool aims to build a strong investment community, which it does by providing a variety of resources: the website, books, a newspaper column, a radio [show], and [newsletters]," wrote (the clearly insightful and talented) money reporter Kathleen Elkins. "This site has something for every type of investor, from basic lessons for beginners to investing commentary on mutual funds, stock sectors, and value for the more advanced."

Our mission at The Motley Fool is to help the world invest better, so it's nice to receive that kind of recognition. It lets us know we're doing our job.

Whether that's helping the entirely uninitiated overcome their fear of stocks all the way to offering clear and successful guidance on complicated-sounding options trades, we want to provide our readers with a boost to the next step on their journey to financial independence.

Articles and beyond

As Business Insider wrote, there are a number of resources available from the Fool for investors of all levels and styles.

In addition to the dozens of free articles we publish every day on our website, I want to highlight two must-see spots in your tour of

For the beginning investor

Investing can seem like a Big Deal to those who have yet to buy their first stock. Many investment professionals try to infuse the conversation with jargon in order to deter individual investors from tackling it on their own (and to justify their often sky-high fees).

But the individual investor can beat the market. The real secret to investing is that it doesn't take tons of money, endless hours, or super-secret formulas that only experts possess.

That's why we created a best-selling guide that walks investors-to-be through everything they need to know to get started. And because we're so dedicated to our mission, we've made that available for free.

If you're just starting out (or want to help out someone who is), go to, drop in your email address, and you'll be able to instantly access the quick-read guide ... for free.

For the listener

Whether it's on the stationary exercise bike or during my daily commute, I spend a lot of time going nowhere. But I've found a way to make that time benefit me.

The Motley Fool offers five podcasts that I refer to as "binge-worthy financial information."

Motley Fool Money features a team of our analysts discussing the week's top business and investing stories, interviews, and an inside look at the stocks on our radar. It's also featured on several dozen radio stations across the country.

The hosts of Motley Fool Answers challenge the conventional wisdom on life's biggest financial issues to reveal what you really need to know to make smart money moves.

David Gardner, co-founder of The Motley Fool, is among the most respected and trusted sources on investing. And he's the host of Rule Breaker Investing, in which he shares his insights into today's most innovative and disruptive companies ... and how to profit from them.

Market Foolery is our daily look at stocks in the news, as well as the top business and investing stories.

And Industry Focus offers a deeper dive into a specific industry and the stories making headlines. Healthcare, technology, energy, consumer goods, and other industries take turns in the spotlight.

They're all informative, entertaining, and eminently listenable ... and I don't say that simply because the hosts all sit within a Nerf-gun shot of my desk. Rule Breaker Investing and Answers contain timeless advice, so you might want to go back to the beginning with those. The other three take their cues from the market, so you'll want to listen to the most recent first. All are available at

But wait, there's more

The book and the podcasts – both free ... both awesome – also come with an ongoing benefit. If you download the book, or if you enter your email address in the magical box at the podcasts page, you'll get ongoing market coverage sent straight to your inbox.

Investor Insights is valuable and enjoyable coverage of everything from macroeconomic events to investing strategies to our analyst's travels around the world to find the next big thing. Also free.

Get the book. Listen to a podcast. Sign up for Investor Insights. I'm not saying that any of those things will make you rich ... but Business Insider seems to think so.

Compare Brokers