The Highest Possible Returns. Period.

In 1992, I was 26 and already spending my fair share of time online. For several years, I'd been a satisfied customer of America Online. Although I liked the service, I decided not to buy shares of the company at the initial public offering that year. I thought I'd wait a while. (Idiot.)

I kicked myself for two years while the stock quadrupled. In the spring of '94, I followed my instincts and became an AOL shareholder -- in spite of an article in a major financial publication that declared AOL grossly overvalued and predicted that the stock would decline by 35%.

The following year, the stock dropped 25% or more three times. And then in 1996, shares absorbed a drop of 65%! Despite these setbacks, the company went on to wreak havoc on both the business and journalistic establishments, en route to putting up some of the best returns available during a decade of great investment returns.

Even with all the temporary downturns, and even though the stock is today down from its all-time high, my initial investment has still increased about 25 times overall -- which amounts to an annualized return of more than 24%.

We'd all love to find the next AOL or Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG  ) . That goes without saying.

But how can ordinary investors like you and me -- a couple of regular Fools -- find the next great company? It's not impossible. If you can train your eyes to spot innovative companies breaking the rules in their industries, you increase your odds dramatically.

You can't score if you don't shoot
The Wise of Wall Street would chalk up AOL's 24% annualized gains to luck. "No one can really identify the great companies of the next generation," they'd say. Growth stocks are too risky; it's best to avoid that style of investing altogether and let a Street "expert" manage your investments.

I disagree. Investing in great companies early in their high-growth stages and then holding them for the long term will provide the highest possible returns. Period.

We call those companies Rule Breakers. Our investment service of the same name seeks out the great growth stocks of tomorrow -- the potential AOLs -- before the Street catches on.

Think big, but keep an eye on the basics
Boiled down, I look for six signs of a potential Rule Breaker:

Sign No. 1: Top dog and first mover in an important, emerging industry.
Top dogs are active, fast-moving market leaders. In 1994, AOL was a top dog. Some years earlier, Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT  ) was a top dog before making its impressive run. First movers seize a temporary edge over the competition, then exploit that advantage. These companies come from emerging industries -- like biotechnology today or e-commerce a few years back -- because it's unlikely that the railroad or meat-packing industries have much room left to run.

Rule Breakers are not hidden; they are right before our eyes, and they bring a disruptive technology, clever and effective marketing, or a brand-new business model to this little backwater planet of ours. They rattle our capitalistic foundations.

Sign No. 2: Sustainable advantage gained through business momentum, patent protection, visionary leadership, or inept competitors.
Can the company protect the advantage it obtained from its first-mover status? Netflix (Nasdaq: NFLX  ) , for example, is absolutely dominating online video rental and is consolidating its power over the entire rental industry.

Sign No. 3: Strong past price appreciation.
Sometimes, the best investments appear overvalued. I bought AOL after it quadrupled. eBay (Nasdaq: EBAY  ) doubled within two years, yet it made late-to-the-game investors huge profits. Was Tiger Woods unknown before he joined the professional tour and started winning majors? Was No. 23 unheralded when he joined the Chicago Bulls after his junior year at North Carolina?

Sign No. 4: Good management and smart backing.
This is the most important attribute of all -- and it might be the most difficult to get right. Few would disagree that visionary leaders are behind the greatest companies of our generation: Microsoft had Bill Gates, eBay has Pierre Omidyar, and Starbucks (Nasdaq: SBUX  ) has Howard Schultz. Investors should also be prepared to learn about the venture backers of a young company. If the very best venture capital firms are behind a company, maybe you should be, too.

Sign No. 5: Strong consumer appeal.
Rule Breaking companies provide products or services that improve the quality of people's lives. Microsoft, for example, made home computer use a reality.

Sign No. 6: You must find documented proof that it is overvalued according to the financial media.
This is the easiest one of all to identify. Every day, the Wall Street pooh-bahs declare that this or that stock is overvalued. Google shares begin trading publicly, and the naysayers predict another tech "meltdown." Even today, with the vast majority of stocks having taken huge hits, there are some companies with improving fundamentals that Wall Street is afraid to touch because they appear more expensive than others.

If a company's growing earnings lead to an increasing valuation, someone somewhere will surely argue that the company is overvalued. The reason this is valuable is that it keeps people out of a stock; later on, as the company proves out its position as a profitable, even dominant, leader, then the skeptics finally buy -- which is what can give you serious appreciation as an early investor in Rule Breaker stocks!

Before they were blue chips
So there you have it. Those are the characteristics I look for in tomorrow's landscape-changing companies.

It's essential to our strategy to identify great companies early in their growth cycles. Then we hold for the long term. Indeed, many of the best examples of Rule Breakers are today's blue-chip companies. You may recognize a few:

Company

Date*

Initial Investment

Current Value**

Return

Compound Annual Growth Rate

Amgen (Nasdaq: AMGN  )

1986

$1,000

$144,878

14,388%

24%

Cisco (Nasdaq: CSCO  )

1992

$1,000

$40,610

3,961%

24%

Microsoft

1988

$1,000

$73,833

7,283%

23%

*Two years after the company went public.**All prices adjusted for splits and dividends.

Each of these companies had the six signs of a Rule Breaker at one point in its growth cycle -- and each posted fantastic returns as a result. There are other not-as-famous companies out there -- hundreds of them -- that once were poised for the limelight but now are forgotten. In most cases, the flameouts and the fakers significantly lacked one or more of the signs we pointed to above.

There is no trade-off
With detailed information on more than 6,000 publicly traded companies, the stock market can't help being fairly efficient. But the market doesn't have all the information, does it? Many people insist on following the rules laid down by Wall Street or by the latest "this is the way to invest" fad investment book, regardless of how banal or unsuccessful these prescribed rules behave in practice.

There's our opportunity. My team of analysts at our Motley Fool Rule Breakers investment service searches obsessively for these opportunities. Each month, we give you two new Rule Breaking ideas that we believe are worth holding onto over the long run and will have superior returns to the market.

If you'd like to read our analysis of all our potential Rule Breakers in greater depth, join us for a free 30-day trial today. You can cancel your trial at any time -- you have my word. Click here to learn more.

And one last thing. As big-time Rule Breaker Steve Jobs told Stanford graduates: "Stay hungry. Stay Foolish."

Already a member of Rule Breakers? Log in at the top of this page.

This article was originally published on June 23, 2005. It has been updated.

Fool co-founder David Gardner owns shares of Netflix, Microsoft, Starbucks, and AOL's parent company, Time Warner. eBay and Starbucks are Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendations. Microsoft and Dell are Inside Value picks. Procter & Gamble is an Income Investor selection. Motley Fool Options has recommended a bull call spread on eBay. The Fool owns shares of Procter & Gamble and Starbucks. The Fool has a disclosure policy


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (10)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On October 23, 2009, at 9:40 AM, sept2749 wrote:

    This info. is important to make your point but it's the past and the past is just that! How about talking more about the future based on stats, not caps recs.We all know what happened with Cisco and Msft. How about a name or two for the future -for free! A lot of us, I"m pretty sure, subscribe to your premium services and they are fine but if you're going to write an article like this throw in a couple of names so it doesn't look like BAIT to buy a premium service. I subscribe to 2 preium services and I look forward to your daily articles This article hits me right in the face as a sales pitch and nothing else! I love you guys but enough with the sales pitches disguised as articles.

  • Report this Comment On October 23, 2009, at 10:11 AM, 7722 wrote:

    Ditto to sept2749's post I could not have said it better as a premium subscriber.

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 1015268, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 7/26/2014 1:35:52 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement