The Revolution Will Be Securitized

Recs

8

Fifteen years ago, just as the Fool was beginning its mission to demystify investing and personal finance, the money management industry set off on a mission of its own: transforming plain-vanilla mutual funds into exchange-traded funds (ETFs), baskets of securities that trade throughout the day like individual stocks.

The most popular ETF, the S&P-tracking SPDRs (AMEX: SPY),  rolled off the assembly line in 1993, in fact, and through the close of last month had cranked out a cumulative return of roughly 197%.

31 flavors and then some
That's not too shabby, of course, but these days, SPDRs looks a bit plain-vanilla itself. Indeed, ETFs have become a veritable industry, cranking out novel products such as the Rydex Equal Weight Financials (RYF), which bypasses the traditional market-cap-weighted approach to index investing by allocating common sums to companies such as Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, and Bank of America (NYSE: BAC), each of which appears among the ETF's top holdings.

Leveraged ETFs are all the rage these days, too. Ultra QQQ ProShares (AMEX: QLD), for example, is designed to return two times the daily return of its underlying benchmark, the Nasdaq 100, and includes race cars such as Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL), Research In Motion (Nasdaq: RIMM), and Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) near the top of its lineup.

Shorting the market is a cinch with ETFs, too, with vehicles like Rydex Inverse 2x S&P 500 (AMEX: RSW) strapping on rocket boosters amid the market's sharp downturn this year. (Year to date, this "doubling down" ETF has returned nearly 76%).

The ETF revolution
Setting aside for a moment the pros and cons of the more exotic investment vehicles, I think that, on balance, the ETF revolution has been a positive development for individual investors. Sophisticated tools and techniques that used to be available only to professional money managers are now within easy reach of anyone with a brokerage account.

Moreover, if assets under management in ETFs are any indication, investors have given the industry a big thumbs-up, too. According to the Investment Company Institute –- the fund industry's keeper of facts and figures -- nearly $600 billion is residing in roughly 700 ETFs, a "product line" figure that's up from "just" 546 at the close of 2007.

A pause that refreshes?
Those numbers are worth pausing over, indicating as they do both the popularity of ETFs and the likelihood -– the certitude, really –- that the industry has cranked out some products that virtually no investor needs. Then, too, the convenience and accessibility that ETFs provide is a double-edged sword, providing fodder for hyperactive day trading and market calls.

Traditional mutual funds, by contrast, are priced just once per day -– after the market's close -– and therefore don't present quite the temptation that ETFs do. Traditional funds have the edge when it comes to dollar-cost averaging as well. Provided the fund you're after is of the no-load variety and appears on your brokerage's no-transaction fee (NTF) list -– or if you just go directly through the shop that offers the fund -– you'll never have to cough up a commission to invest in a traditional fund. Not so with ETFs, for which your broker will ding you just as he or she would for stock transactions. Fair, after all, is only fair.

Freedom of choice
The bottom line, then, for me is this: While much has changed in the wonderful world of money management over the past 15 years, some notions remain permanently true: Diversification across a wide swath of the market via vehicles that boast a focus on fundamentals is a terrific way to build wealth over time. ETFs can and should be a part of the game plan for many investors, but they're just pieces of the puzzle.

Still, when it comes to investing intelligently, I think having multiple options is a good thing. Indeed, at Ready-Made Millionaire -- the real-money Fool service that I head up -- we've plunked down approximately $50,000 on a high-octane ETF. Importantly, though, this fund appears in the context of a carefully calibrated portfolio that includes best-in-breed traditional funds as well as cherry-picked individual companies that we think have what it takes to beat the market over the next three to five years and beyond.

An intelligently constructed portfolio is the puzzle itself, and if you'd like to see how we've assembled ours, just click here to learn more about Ready-Made Millionaire and to snag a free copy of our special report, The 11-Minute Millionaire. 

Shannon Zimmerman runs point on Ready-Made Millionaire and doesn't own shares of any of the companies mentioned. Google is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers recommendation, Apple is a Stock Advisor choice, and Bank of America is an Income Investor selection. The Motley Fool owns shares of SPDRs. The Fool has a strict disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On October 17, 2008, at 3:44 PM, bcadwal wrote:

    When I bought into Global Gains and Hidden Gems it was my impression that there would be more of a service than "buy this stock." Now I am down a ton and seeing that it will be a number of years to recoup.

    Should I say thanks for that?

  • Report this Comment On October 17, 2008, at 7:36 PM, WhidbeyIsland wrote:

    As someone who has been involved with the Motley Fool (off and on), I think it has shown both an admirable tendency to counter the "hype" of the financial industry and a lamentable tendency to engage in a certain amount of hype in its own marketing.

    I find it difficult to provide a fair evaluation of these two, somewhat contradictory tendencies. I made my own investing decisions. I used a lot of input from the MF. I take responsibility for the fact that my investments are mostly (thought not entirely) down. I would be a little more enthusiastic, though, if they were up a bit more.

    Isn't that the way?

  • Report this Comment On October 19, 2008, at 4:37 PM, bigbroslittlebro wrote:

    I learn a lot from the motley fool. From the comments too. Simply checking out the examples widens ones horizons.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 754434, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/10/2009 10:38:56 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Health-Care Reform: A Tale of Two Chambers

Related Tickers

11/10/2009 10:23 AM
BAC $16.11 Up +0.34 +2.16%
Bank of America Co… CAPS Rating: ***
RIMM $62.88 Up +1.32 +2.14%
Research In Motion… CAPS Rating: ***
RSW $59.56 Down -0.14 -0.24%
RYDEX INVERSE 2X S… CAPS Rating: *
SPY $109.80 Up +0.23 +0.21%
S&P DEP RECEIPTS CAPS Rating: No stars
AAPL $203.14 Up +1.68 +0.83%
Apple, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
GOOG $566.65 Up +4.14 +0.74%
Google, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
QLD $54.14 Up +0.38 +0.71%
Ultra QQQ ProShare… CAPS Rating: *

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Defined-benefit plan: A defined-benefit plan is a retirement arrangement in which an eligible retired employee receives specified payouts from his former employer throughout retirement. The employer is responsible for managing the money to be able to make these pension payments, so the payouts can be reduced or eliminated if circumstances warrant.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!