4 Fees You Don't Need to Pay

Don't let it get away!

Keep track of the stocks that matter to you.

Help yourself with the Fool's FREE and easy new watchlist service today.

During the bull market, you could get away with a lot of minor mistakes. Now, though, you have to safeguard every penny. You won't balance your budget by buying a Maserati just to get to the grocery store and back. By the same token, there's just no reason to pay for premium investing services you don't need, much less use.

In recent years, many financial professionals have found ways to raise fees and other charges and ensure a steady stream of income for their firms. In doing so, they've often focused on services that their clients don't even use. Given that many people start investing with an advisor's help, it's unfortunate that they often come to regret the experience.

There's no shortage of ways that financial professionals collect money from their clients. The following are just a few.

Wrap accounts
Sold as a way to save on brokerage commissions, wrap accounts let advisors instead collect a quarterly or annual fee based on a percentage of your total assets. But if you don't trade often, paying as much as 3% of your account balance annually is highway robbery.

Load funds
Many mutual funds charge investors up-front fees to buy shares. The $128 billion Growth Fund of America (AGTHX) from American Funds, for instance, charges as much as 5.75% to new investors. Yet some investors, such as those who have access to load-waived retirement plan accounts, don't have to pay. If you're paying that front-end load, less than $0.95 of every dollar you invest actually goes toward buying shares of Oracle (Nasdaq: ORCL  ) , Lowe's (NYSE: LOW  ) , Medtronic (NYSE: MDT  ) , and all the other stocks in which the Growth Fund invests. The rest goes to whoever sells you the fund, or to the fund company itself, if you buy shares directly.

12b-1 fees
Originally established as a way to allow funds to cover costs of marketing and distribution, 12b-1 fees often provide supplemental revenue for fund companies. Even funds that are closed to the public -- and therefore don't need to market themselves -- sometimes charge these fees, including funds from Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS  ) and Janus Capital (NYSE: JNS  ) .

Miscellaneous charges
Adding insult to injury, some firms add on a host of nickel-and-dime fees to the more substantial charges they make. For instance, you may pay annual custodial fees for IRA accounts, low-balance fees if you fail to meet a certain minimum, inactivity fees if you don't make trades that generate enough in commissions, or market data fees to receive real-time stock quotes or other information.

Occasionally, firms have gotten in trouble over inappropriate fees. Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS  ) , for instance, paid more than $6 million in fines to the NASD three years ago for charging asset-based fees for clients who would have been better off in a transaction-based account. More recently, UBS (NYSE: UBS  ) settled a similar case with the New York Attorney General's office for $23 million in restitution and fines.

Give yourself a break!
In this era of competition among financial-services firms, you don't need to settle for excessive fees. By simply looking for the best deal for your own situation, you can narrow down your options and find the broker that will save you the most money. Here are some tips to consider:

  • You don't have to find the absolute lowest fees. For most investors, the difference between paying $7 to trade stocks versus $10 becomes inconsequential. If you only make a few trades per year, the service your broker provides is a lot more important than saving a few bucks per commission.
  • Find your comfort zone. Some discount brokers have fairly imposing trading platforms, which make it hard for novice investors to do things as simple as just buying 100 shares of a widely-owned stock. Before you invest, make sure you can do what you need to do without getting a company rep on the line -- a rep who might add extra charges for assistance.
  • Go no-load. With mutual funds, paying loads or 12b-1 fees just doesn't make sense. There are thousands of good no-load funds out there, so go with the low-cost alternative -- unless you have no-fee access through a 401(k) or other special arrangement.

If you're facing big losses in your portfolio, you can't afford to waste money on silly fees. By simply saying no to fees that don't buy anything of value for you, you can save a bundle. In this economy, every dollar you can bring back to your bottom line is worth a lot.

Further Foolish protection for your investment dollars:

Are you paying too much in fees on your mutual funds? Our Motley Fool Champion Funds newsletter can give you great choices that won't nickel-and-dime you to death. Best of all, take advantage of our free trial offer to get a complimentary preview.

Fool contributor Dan Caplinger regrets the money he gave to his broker as a teen. He doesn't own shares of the stocks mentioned in this article. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. The Fool's disclosure policy is fee-free.

Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (10)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 24, 2008, at 7:15 PM, vivvie1 wrote:

    Surely your respected sobering analyst meant 6000 NOT 600 possible bottom of the market?!

  • Report this Comment On November 24, 2008, at 7:17 PM, vivvie1 wrote:

    Surely the analyst you mention meant the bottom would be around 6000 NOT 600???

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 781832, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/23/2016 10:46:11 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,145.71 -16.64 -0.09%
S&P 500 2,141.16 -0.18 -0.01%
NASD 5,257.40 15.57 0.30%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

10/21/2016 4:01 PM
GS $174.67 Up +0.16 +0.09%
Goldman Sachs CAPS Rating: ***
JNS $13.82 Down -0.29 -2.06%
Janus Capital Grou… CAPS Rating: *
LOW $70.65 Up +0.76 +1.09%
Lowe's CAPS Rating: ****
MDT $83.91 Down -0.11 -0.13%
Medtronic CAPS Rating: *****
MS $33.44 Up +0.54 +1.64%
Morgan Stanley CAPS Rating: ****
ORCL $37.93 Down -0.16 -0.42%
Oracle CAPS Rating: ****
UBS $13.67 Up +0.03 +0.22%
UBS AG (USA) CAPS Rating: **