Adding Fuel to the Oil and Gas Boom

Recs

9

Had I written such a headline a decade ago -- heck, just five years ago -- I might have looked like a prescient genius. Writing it as I do now, years after oil and gas company stocks have exploded, oil itself sits north of $140 a barrel, and many feel that big oil has ruined their lives, I appear to be a tad behind the times. Or am I? A coming rule change by the SEC could provide yet more fuel for the blazing oil and gas boom.

Prove it to me
When oil and gas companies report their reserves, they are required by regulation to only consider "proved reserves." The SEC has typically considered that to mean reserves that are economically feasible to produce. Moreover, oil deposits that have typically been uneconomical to extract, including oil shales and tar sands, now seem far more feasible, thanks to advances in technology and the cost oil.

At lower price levels, the costly production of oil sands is too costly to try. But when the price of oil sits north of $100 a barrel, oil sands make more economic sense. Canada, where companies like Oilsands Quest (AMEX: BQI) own properties, has the world's largest deposits of oil sands, along with Venezuela. With much of the "cheap oil" already tapped, more expensive forms, like the oil-sands variety, are becoming attractive, leading oil-sands big dogs like Canadian Natural Resources (NYSE: CNQ) and Suncor Energy (NYSE: SU) to build and expand infrastructure to support the production and upgrading of the extra-heavy oil.

SEC regulations have specifically prohibited companies from including such reserves in their numbers. That could all change now, because the SEC has been prodded to catch up with the times. It is proposing to change the rules on what exactly constitutes "proved reserves," and that greater transparency on oil and gas companies' reserves could represent an extreme buying opportunity.

Discounting the unknown
Oil and gas companies are valued upon their proved reserves and their ability to produce them. The SEC requires that future net cash flows be discounted at an annual rate of 10% to determine their "present value." However, if (or when) the rule change goes into effect, the amount of proved reserves could skyrocket for some companies, which would make many companies' current enterprise values to proved reserves seem extremely undervalued by comparison.The SEC is recognizing that modern technology, such as the 3-D and 4-D seismic tools used by Dawson Geophysical (Nasdaq: DWSN) and OYO Geospace (Nasdaq: OYOG), allow companies to employ sound waves to estimate with reasonable certainty the undeveloped reserves present. As it stands now, the rule would only allow such reserves to be counted if they were immediately adjacent to currently productive wells or by drilling the reservoir and conducting flow-through tests.

Final Foolish thoughts
The rules in effect now were written some 25 years ago, and like most government regulations, they change at a glacial pace. Yet with the changes contemplated by the regulations, investors could find themselves in a better position than wildcatters blindly digging for black gold. They could be sitting on a gusher of profits just waiting to be tapped.

What do the unfolding financial crisis and ongoing market volatility mean for your money? The Fool's here with answers. Get the best of our daily commentary and analysis in your inbox simply by entering your email address in the box below.

OYO Geospace and Dawson Geophysical are Motley Fool Hidden Gems recommendations. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days.

Fool contributor Rich Duprey does not have a financial position in any of the stocks mentioned in this article. You can see his holdings here. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 30, 2008, at 3:11 PM, btfiqq wrote:

    I keep hearing about this, but I have seen no article that mentions the time frame. Is this something that is going to happen in a year, two years, five years, etc. Some of these organizations move at a glacial pace. Anyone know the answer?

  • Report this Comment On July 09, 2008, at 3:33 PM, 10qdetective wrote:

    Rich:

    Nice pick-up on potential SEC Proven Reserve Recognition change.

    In my view, expamded disclosure, which would permit Suncor Energy to classify previously excluded unconventional resources, such as tar sands, as proven reserves should help potential lenders and investors better understand the company’s leverage, facilitating access to needed monies.

    http://industry.bnet.com/energy/2008/07/08/sec-gives-boost-t...

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 675481, ~/articles/articlehandler.aspx, 12/2/2008 5:01:04 AM,

Sign up for FREE Motley Fool site access!

Already registered? Login Here

It’s FREE! Enter your email address, and we’ll rush you to the article you're looking for right now.

Privacy / Legal Information

We will use your email address only to keep you informed about updates to our web site and about other products and services that we think might interest you. The Motley Fool respects your privacy. Please read our Privacy Statement

.

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

What Fools Are Saying

Most Recent

Most Recommended

Market Summary

S&P 500816.21 -8.93%
DJIA8,149.09 -7.70%
NASD1,398.07 -8.95%
Updated: 4:04:56 PM
Sponsored by:

Related Tickers

Oilsands Quest, Inc.

CAPS Rating 4/5 Stars

$0.76

-0.34 (-30.91%)

Outperform1068

Underperform36

Rate This Stock