This Just In: Upgrades and Downgrades

Recs

2

Be A Motley Fool Millionaire!

David Gardner's top pick took an epic run of 1,334%! See what he’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

At The Motley Fool, we poke plenty of fun at Wall Street analysts and their endless cycle of upgrades, downgrades, and "initiating coverage at neutral." So you might think we'd be the last people to give virtual ink to such "news." And we would be -- if that were all we were doing.

But in "This Just In," we don't simply tell you what the analysts said. We'll also show you whether they know what they're talking about. To help, we've enlisted Motley Fool CAPS, our tool for rating stocks and analysts alike. With CAPS, we'll be tracking the long-term performance of Wall Street's best and brightest -- and its worst and sorriest, too.

And speaking of the best ...
Analyst-watchers have been treated to a spate of new opinions on tech stocks over the past week, as a "new" voice begins to make itself heard on Briefing.com. On Oct. 3 (or thereabouts), venerable British banker Barclays Capital began submitting its opinions to the ratings aggregator -- and as such, revealed itself to CAPS as well. Here's what we know about Barclays.

Who it is
Barclays Capital has been in business for a little over a decade now, and operates as a subsidiary of Barclays plc, the $38 billion British megabank.

What it says
Over the past three trading days, Barclays has been so active that it's already earned itself a (tentative) CAPS rating. While the sample size is small, and the banker's score therefore likely to be erratic, Barclays has made a name for itself by wading right into the debate on a number of high-profile names:

Company

Barclays Said:

CAPS Says:

Barclays' Pick Beating (Lagging) S&P by:

Apache (NYSE: APA)

Outperform

*****

7 points

General Electric (NYSE: GE)

Outperform

****

7 points

Anadarko (NYSE: APC)

Outperform

****

6 points

Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL)

Outperform

****

1 point

So as you can see, Barclays is off to a strong start. The banker's getting 54% of its picks right out of the gate, and currently ranks in the second quintile of investors tracked by CAPS, with a CAPS rating of 70.71. Not bad for a newbie. But does Barclays have the skills to go the distance?

Today's news
This morning, Barclays made a couple bearish bets on the tech sector, downgrading both IBM (NYSE: IBM) and EMC (NYSE: EMC) to "Equal Weight," while cutting its estimates for Cisco (Nasdaq: CSCO). And yet, if you listen carefully, you may be surprised by the tone of Barclays' "downgrades."

  • On IBM: "We believe IBM's management team has done a very good job improving the company's growth profile and we acknowledge its recurring profit streams, but we believe it is prudent to acknowledge risks presented by the economy."
  • On EMC: "We believe EMC has attractive cash and can take share." That said, Barclays sees the "potential for weakness in the storage market in Q4 and beyond, particularly within financial services." (And who would know better than a banker?)
  • Similarly, on Cisco, Barclays frets over: "a deepening situation in financials and a possible spread to other verticals."

And I have to say that I agree with just about everything Barclays is saying -- except for its conclusions, which smack of the absurd. Basically, Barclays is telling us that these three companies are all class acts. Yet the banker expects a slowing economy to hold their performance to no better than that of the rest of the market?

Foolish takeaway
Sorry, Barclays, but that doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. From where I sit, each of these companies looks downright attractive. The most expensive of the bunch, IBM, sells for a PEG ratio of about 1.1 -- hardly exorbitant for a globe-striding giant of the tech sphere. Similarly stellar EMC and Cisco both still look cheaper based on their P/Es. And when you consider that all three companies generate massively greater cash profits than they report as net income, I can't help but find them cheap.

No. Check that. Dirt cheap. Thanks to the global meltdown in equities, investors now have the opportunity to own three stars of the sphere, IBM, EMC, and Cisco, and pay less than 1 times their price-to-free cash flow-to-growth ratios for the privilege. So my advice: Don't be fooled (small "f") by Barclays' cognitively dissonant musings of this morning.

And don't miss your chance to buy these tech giants at today's discount prices.

“Make Big Money With Options” Motley Fool CFO Ollen Douglass recently made over $100,000 buying options on 7 well known stocks. Now we’re committed to turning his small fortune into a massive one! And we want you to join us! Enter your email address to hear more:

Fool contributor Rich Smith does not own shares of any company named above. You can find him on CAPS, publicly pontificating under the handle TMFDitty, where he's currently ranked No. 1,301 out of more than 115,000 players. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On October 07, 2008, at 2:57 PM, lylegray wrote:

    I could not agree more, seems that a lot of the "pros" haven't worked a down or volitle market and are looking to fill space.

  • Report this Comment On October 07, 2008, at 3:38 PM, dmprofit wrote:

    How do you actually calculate

    "price-to-free cash flow-to-growth ratio"?

  • Report this Comment On October 08, 2008, at 10:25 AM, TMFDitty wrote:

    dmprofit... :)

    Here's how:

    Price: That's obvious

    Free cash flow: Go to the cash flow statement and find the line for "cash from operations." Subtract from that the line for "property, plant, and equipment" (capex). Voila. You have FCF.

    Growth: This one's always a guess, but use the 5-year forward growth estimate on Yahoo!

    Divide the first number by the second by the third. Anything less than 1.0 suggests serious cheapness.

    -Rich

  • Report this Comment On October 09, 2008, at 1:25 PM, dmprofit wrote:

    I appreciate the explanation but am still unclear.

    Are you dividing the price per share by the FCF per share and then dividing by a percentage?

    To make it clear, using IBM, EMC, or Cisco, can you show the calculation?

  • Report this Comment On October 20, 2008, at 11:15 PM, TMFDitty wrote:

    Cut off the percentage sign and pretend it's a whole number.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 746967, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/3/2009 7:02:35 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Fool Search: Be GM's Next CEO!

By The Motley Fool

Fool Search: Be GM's Next CEO!

Related Tickers

12/2/2009 4:00 PM
GE $16.07 Down -0.10 -0.62%
General Electric C… CAPS Rating: ****
APA $96.37 Down -1.35 -1.38%
Apache Corp CAPS Rating: ****
IBM $127.21 Down -0.73 -0.57%
International Busi… CAPS Rating: ****
AAPL $196.23 Down -0.74 -0.38%
Apple, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
CSCO $23.87 Down -0.05 -0.21%
Cisco Systems, Inc… CAPS Rating: ****
EMC $16.74 Down -0.24 -1.41%
EMC Corp CAPS Rating: ****
APC $60.96 Down -0.60 -0.97%
Anadarko Petroleum… CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Short squeeze: A short squeeze is when many people who have sold a stock short buy back shares at the same time.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!