One Reason Stocks Are Crashing

Recs

26

Disney Buys Marvel!

David Gardner called it. He’s up 1,334%! See what David’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

Stock Advisor

Crazy days we're living in. As I write this, things are terrible. Not just terrible … so terrible that stock exchanges faced the possibility of calling in the financial riot police -- circuit-breaker rules -- to shut down markets if things get too rowdy.

That hasn't happened quite yet, and to be honest, it's anyone's guess what will happen before the day's out. 1,000-point drop? 1,000-point gain? Odds of each happening seem just as likely these days. The VIX "volatility index" stopped just short of 90 this morning -- by far an all-time high, and an absolutely unthinkable reading until recently.

Well, yeah, the economy's a mess
But, come on, I'll be impressed if someone can give a rational explanation for why the intrinsic value of Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG) was worth 6% less this morning than it was yesterday. Or why the long-term value of Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO) suddenly dropped 7% this week over last. They couldn't do it. There's little, if any, explanation for the volatility.

Something else is lurking around markets right now, shaking things apart at a furious pace. But what? Here's one reason that sticks out in my mind.

Hedge funds
Coming off one of their worst months ever, hedge funds -- which control (well, controlled) trillions of dollars of capital -- are facing an onslaught of redemptions from investors who either need their money back to cover their own losses, or are scared out of their minds now that their once-stable returns have turned against them.

Either way, when clients yank money out, legions of former master-of-the-universe managers start selling untold amounts of money indiscriminately and, on days like today, all at the same time.

On top of that, most hedge funds have what are called "high-water marks," meaning the fund manager has to make up losses before they can charge performance fees in the future.

The average hedge fund is down 17.6% year to date, meaning most funds have to score considerable gains from today's levels before a manager could start charging performance fees again. Connect the dots, and you get a situation where even hedge funds that aren't facing client redemptions have an incentive to shut down. When they shut down, they sell. Everything. Quickly. And the results can equal downright hysteria.

How bad can it get?
One of the most outspoken voices of how apocalyptic things might get is NYU professor Nouriel Roubini. He saw most of this coming years ago, but no one took him too seriously until recently, when his predictions became true.

What's he saying now? Earlier this week, Roubini predicted, "There will be massive dumping of assets … hundreds of hedge funds are going to go bust." Gulp. He followed up by saying, "We're seeing the beginning of a run on a big chunk of the hedge funds … don't be surprised if policy makers need to close down markets for a week or two in coming days."

I hope he's wrong, but honestly, betting against Roubini has been a losing battle lately. The important thing to keep in mind is that, if that situation were to occur, it'd create what would undoubtedly be the buying opportunity of a lifetime.

If you're hell-bent on weathering this storm and holding your investments for years to come, you have little to worry about. If you stick to underleveraged, high-quality, cash-rich names such as Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-B) or Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT), you'll almost certainly find yourself in a much better position five or ten years down the road.

Bubbles burst. Panics create opportunities. Patience pays.

Hang in there.

For related Foolishness:

Like this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Weekly by entering your email below.

Fool contributor Morgan Housel owns shares of Procter & Gamble and Berkshire Hathaway. Microsoft, Coca-Cola, and Berkshire are Motley Fool Inside Value selections. Berkshire is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor pick. The Fool owns stock in Berkshire Hathaway, and has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On October 24, 2008, at 5:10 PM, ArcticWaterFL wrote:

    Quote from the article "I'll be impressed if someone can give a rational explanation for why the intrinsic value of Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG) was worth 6% less this morning than it was yesterday. Or why the long-term value of Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO) suddenly dropped 7% this week over last."

    Easy answer: maybe investors decided, for any number of reasons, it was overpriced and was indeed worth less than yesterday's closing price.

  • Report this Comment On October 24, 2008, at 5:24 PM, SteveTheInvestor wrote:

    I agree with you Artic:

    The same comment is read over and over in regards to Berkshire. We may be seeing some "price anchoring" in progress. It seems that it not logical for Berkshire to be worth 20% (or whatever) less. Well yeah, it IS logical. The economy stinks, and that will affect Berkshire just like every other company.

    It's kind of like the furniture store that applies absurd prices to their wares so that they can hold a "super sale" every week. Not a great price on their stuff.... it was just overpriced to begin with.

  • Report this Comment On October 24, 2008, at 8:06 PM, disaster2008 wrote:

    It is interesting the "fear of a global recession" has been cited in the news for the last several days as driving stock prices down. This "fear" has been in the news a long time and stocks have already been falling for 10 months prior to the latest crash. Sure the economy sucks, but that is old news and stocks started falling along time ago in response to it. The recent crash is due to people are freaking out and selling - that is why the market is crashing now. The ball started rolling with Bernanke's and Paulson's fear tactics to get the bailout passed and snowballed from there with help from the media - once the majority started panicking and selling it became a self-fufilling prophecy. There are stocks with upward earnings revisions and new buy ratings that are being dumped - very irrational. Are we near the bottom now? Who knows? But for long-term buyers this is one big opportunity. I imagine there will be a rally next week with more buying opportunities to follow driven by the media's propensity for sensationalism.

  • Report this Comment On October 24, 2008, at 10:13 PM, rsd102 wrote:

    So, have used car salesmen moved up in society now that hedge fund managers have become the new scum (word is a bit harsh, I know) of the earth??

  • Report this Comment On October 24, 2008, at 10:34 PM, etihwttam wrote:

    Oh my, another "buying opportunity of a lifetime." Sounds like what the Fool was saying last week. But the news just keeps getting worse. Here's an idea. Let's just wait a while and not buy anything, not one new stock at all. Just wait for a little sanity to return. The cards haven't all fallen yet and it is just not a good time to be issuing "this one seems mighty undervalued" recommendations. Consider the source folks. I love the Fool, but right now they need to be saved from themselves.

  • Report this Comment On October 24, 2008, at 10:53 PM, markwg1 wrote:

    What people mean by "stocks are cheap"? In my opinion, stocks are never cheap (e.g. P/E, book value, etc.) because companies' revenues/ profits cannot go up indefinitely, so it's a waste of time to buy stocks based on their P/E. Imagine if you put your money in GM 40 years ago today your return is almost the same as in the 60s!

    WHAT A SHAME TO INVEST IN STOCKS!

  • Report this Comment On October 24, 2008, at 11:49 PM, rsd102 wrote:

    Sorry for the tacky hedge fund manager comment. Seriously, though, what does this mean for the "average" investor? We fund our 401k, Roths, etc every year to now be below what we would've had if we just pocketed the cash (for me, about 8 years, 15 or so years for the hubby). A lot below. It changes everything we had thought about and planned for our future. We still have plenty of years to recoup losses, but is this just going to keep happening? It just seems that if you try to do the right thing anymore, you end up paying for someone else's greed. Is the market no place for the little guy to be in anymore?

  • Report this Comment On October 25, 2008, at 12:13 AM, disaster2008 wrote:

    rsd102, it seems like your assumption is that your investments will never recover? If you have lot's of time, which it sounds like you do, there is ample time for your investments to recover and grow. The market always overshoots one way or the other. It will this time and it may have already done so. At this point given your apparent timeframe it only makes sense to leave your long-term money in and keep buying. When you look back on this in 30 years, you will be glad you did. Go to Yahoo finance and look at the S&P 500 graph - maxi timeframe. Wouldn't it have been nice to buy in 1975?

    http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=%5EGSPC&t=my

  • Report this Comment On October 25, 2008, at 12:58 AM, markwg1 wrote:

    Another bank failed! (just after Friday market closed): Georgia Alpha Bank.

    This bear market (unlike the 1987, 1997 and 2001), is the result of excessive borrowings, leverages, credits in the past 50 years! this giant bubble is now going to burst!

    Another strange thing is yen is going up up! however, other emerging market currencies going all the way down... is this normal? I have never seen something so strange in my life... and libor is rising slowly again.

  • Report this Comment On October 25, 2008, at 7:15 AM, Usnzth wrote:

    While investing in real estate a decade ago, I learned that the "Buying Opportunity of a Lifetime" comes along about once a week. To a large extent, the same is true in stocks. At any point in the market, you can find good deals. These deals are sometimes hyped as the greatest thing since sliced bread. Then a new “opportunity of a lifetime” is hyped the next week. Occasionally, you can find a GREAT deal. It is all in the research. When the stock market as a whole is high, a lot of research is necessary to find a stock that is priced low compared to its intrinsic value. The reason the research is necessary during those times is because most individual stocks are priced too high. When the stock market as a whole is low, a lot of research is still necessary to find a stock that is priced low compared to its intrinsic value. The most common reason during times like we are in now is because the intrinsic value of the underlying companies are shaky – thus making stock too highly priced.

    But you only have to find a few great deals and you are set for life.

    The truth is that it is more likely you will find a good deal during a time when the market is depressed. The reason is that some companies (probably only a few) still retain their full value but their stock prices have been pushed down because of the general market.

    There is a lot of “Now is the time to buy!!!!!!!” on the Fool right now. There are a lot of “Stocks will kill you and anyone who buys them is a sucker” attitudes as well. Both of these are true if presented as a qualified statement.

    If you find a great company with steady sales and a growing profit margin in an industry that will be little affected by a recession (some industries will actually do better) and if that company happens to have great management and a lot of cash in hand to help them over the humps, and if that company’s stock price has been greatly lowered because of general market conditions, then now IS the time to buy!

    If you buy stocks in companies that you don’t know because Warren Buffet or Tom Gardner or Engelbert Humperdinck is buying, then you are a sucker and you may very well get slaughtered.

    Like just about everybody else, my portfolio is down. I am just about fully invested and so have very little cash. But if I had a bunch of cash, I would buy the businesses that I have right now at the prices they are at right now. So I guess I will keep what I have.

    Don’t buy stocks. Buy companies.

  • Report this Comment On October 25, 2008, at 9:29 AM, tj99 wrote:

    The feelings expressed in many of the comments, that "yes, the market value is lower and should be" are understandable. To me, the basic reason why the Fool's position and philosophy (good time to buy) makes sense is what they keep writing: if the company makes good decisions, consistently makes money, and has stable management that will continue these traits, then the company will likely be a good investment. If that was considered true at the past higher price, it is logically at least as true at the current lower price. The company may make less profit in these troubled markets, so some discount is warranted on stock price. But many prices on good company stocks seem to have over-corrected. Therefore this is a good time to buy those good companies.

  • Report this Comment On October 25, 2008, at 2:38 PM, newhouseri wrote:

    rsd102, Why would you say Hedge fund managers are scum? You live in a capitalist society. They are not doing something that is illegal. Until the SEC decides to make naked short trading illegal. They are making money doing somthing that is legal. I for one am jealous and envy their wealth, but I don't consider them scum just very savy fund managers that use every tool available to make money.

  • Report this Comment On October 25, 2008, at 6:50 PM, FOOLBEFREE wrote:

    Time to buy some good stocks from now until Dec 31. A lot of selling will happen...hedge funds liquidating , mutual funds redemptions and tax selling season. Still, I will leave some $ for 2009.

  • Report this Comment On October 26, 2008, at 10:34 PM, rsd102 wrote:

    I do understand we live in a capitalistic society and that, in and of itself, creates unfairness, real or perceived. What I was referencing is that there are surveys out there that rank the trustworthiness of professionals. Usually, pharmacists, doctors, ministers, etc are at the top. I am just wondering that since these hedge funds are creating problems with a lot of people's lives, how will the managers now be perceived? I understand they are under pressure to get good results, but I don't believe they are innocent in this. It's been said lately that one of the biggest issues with the market is the issue of confidence due in large part to the volatility. Where is much of that volatility coming from? These redemptions and other manipulations from hedge funds? It is unsettling to know that one group of entities has been allowed to grow so large that they can make the market swing like these hedge funds seem to be doing. If "they" were considered as a collective company of sorts, would it not be violating some sort of antitrust laws? You could say I am jealous of their overall success, too, but I am and would be unwilling to do anything and everything to make money. I have my own pride and comfort level for my actions. I do not appreciate that their collective power is taking me down with them.

  • Report this Comment On October 29, 2008, at 12:48 AM, NEWSMONKEY wrote:

    Sell this rally if you know what is good for you. The reasons are simple and relatively straight forward. Firstly, nothing has changed if anything things have gotten much much worse. The dominoes are falling one by one and leverage is getting wrung out everywhere. Consider Russia which had about 500 billion in reserves and a dollar squeeze of over 300 billion due to maturing dollar denominated debt. Russia is an outlaw in the financial markets consider this action they took today: Court Freezes Altimo's Stake in Vimpelcom http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122516354059275209.html?mod=...

    Further consider these articles today concerning the european nations and England

    Europe Faces `Huge Threat' as Emerging Markets Slide http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&sid=aahr... or this article http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2008/10/24/emerging-market-as... or this one which puts the The scale of euro zone loans at about $2.5 trillion in foreign-currency loans to emerging markets. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7693020.stm

    European banks have lent heavily to crisis-stricken eastern European countries such as Ukraine, Hungary and Belarus. Their exposure which came to a head today makes the US sub prime mess look like child's play given there relative GDP size the problem is more than 5 times that of the US problems. Add to that Iceland, Turkey, Dubai, New Zealand, Argentina and Brazil thrown in just for good measure. These are problems only just coming to light today or in recent weeks. The world is an absolute mess and they are starting to fall like dominoes. Unfortunately once a massive deleveraging like this begins it won't stop any time soon.

    If you are kicking yourself for having not sold sooner don't miss this gift. The rally may last a day or a week but be certain it wont last. This is a prelude to an utter collapse. Consider this article by Nouriel Roubini, Who is he? He was the guy calling for this disaster over two years ago. The New York University professor who predicted the financial crisis in 2006 Bloomberg (October 27, 2008): Roubini Sees `Significant Downside Risk' for Equities http://www.rgemonitor.com/blog/roubini/ If you are thinking about buying now you should spend some time on his blog and I guarantee you won't.

    The monkeys on CNBC (my brothers) call for a bottom being made about 100 times a day. Before you commit the last of your capital trying to buy the bottom ask yourself this question. Who is dumber them for losing the first 35% or me for losing the next 35% because I thought I was smart? So what is the answer? Are you really that smart? Are you really that well informed? Or do you make most of your decisions based on what you see on CNBC?

  • Report this Comment On October 30, 2008, at 2:29 PM, rb7385899 wrote:

    stocks are crashing because the govt is doing handsprings to fix things, and everything they do is immediately proved to be ineffective and counterproductive.

    what part of the constitution says the govt should prop up people who borrow with zero down, the banks who made those loans, the factories that churn out gas guzzling SUVs, railroads and airlines that haven't made money in years, and so on?

    if you throw money at something, you tend to just get more of it. stop throwing good money after bad, and let the markets take care of malfeasance and mispricing.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 762500, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/23/2009 2:19:01 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Buffett Bought Retail. Should You?

Related Tickers

11/23/2009 2:03 PM
BRK-B $3463.65 Up +16.65 +0.48%
Berkshire Hathaway… CAPS Rating: *****
KO $58.19 Up +0.71 +1.24%
The Coca-Cola Comp… CAPS Rating: ****
PG $62.86 Up +1.06 +1.72%
The Procter & Gamb… CAPS Rating: *****
MSFT $29.93 Up +0.31 +1.05%
Microsoft Corp CAPS Rating: ***

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Credit bureau: A credit bureau is an organization that maintains records on the credit worthiness of individuals. Most now use a credit score system that keeps track of credit history and considers factors like late payments, number and amounts of outstanding loans, credit card balances and income. Credit score now seems to have displaced the previously used credit rating system. A credit bureau will issue a…

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!