Paulson Calls a Bottom in the Mortgage Market

Recs

51

Panic 2008... Profit 2009!

Fool -- Now's the time to invest! David and Tom Gardner's new book reveals their strategy for million dollar wealth.

If you were hoping to find out what Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson thinks about the mortgage market, I can’t help you -- I was referring to a different Paulson. Not to worry, though; “my” Paulson -- whose first name is John -- is a more credible authority in this area. A hedge fund manager who is no relation to the Treasury Secretary, he has an impeccable track record of successful calls on which he has built a multibillion-dollar fortune:

  • Last year, Paulson earned $3.7 billion personally. What is really impressive, however, is not the amount but the way in which he earned it. In 2006, while “investors” were still flipping condos in Miami and Phoenix, Paulson had already begun betting on a breakdown in the subprime mortgage market. The strategy paid off handsomely in 2007 -- his Credit Opportunities fund gained nearly 600%!
  • In June, Paulson predicted that worldwide losses due to the credit crisis could ultimately reach $1.3 trillion. At the time, the most dire estimate was that of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), at $945 billion. In September, the IMF raised its estimate to... $1.3 trillion. The IMF has approximately 1,300 professional economists on staff; Paulson & Co. had a total of 45 employees as of July 2007. Estimated losses to date are already approaching $1 trillion.
  • 2008 is turning into one of the worst years in the history of the hedge fund industry, with the average hedge fund down 15.5% in the year to October. Despite this, Paulson has achieved a 29.4% gain for his Advantage Plus fund. All of his funds are up at least 15%.

Paulson has not publicly called a mortgage market bottom, but his actions are a good hint that we may be reaching one: He recently told his investors that he started to buy residential mortgage-backed securities (MBSs) during the week of Nov. 10. His purchases were timed to take advantage of price drops after Hank Paulson announced the government would refrain from buying troubled assets as part of its $700 billion bailout program.

When an early (and correct) bear turns bullish ...
... it’s worth paying attention. Unfortunately for most of us, Paulson (Hank) may have passed on owning assets that will generate healthy returns for Paulson (John) and his investors instead.

Still, the Treasury Secretary will take some comfort from any credible sign the mortgage market may have found its bottom. The other people who are hoping John Paulson is right? Bank CEOs. Even with a tab that is now running in the hundreds of billions of dollars, their exposure to mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities, and related derivatives classified as Level 3 -- the murkiest sort -- remains substantial:

Company

Level 3 Assets (in billions)*

Level 3 Assets as % of Shareholder Equity

Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS)

$67.9

149%

Merrill Lynch (being acquired by Bank of America (NYSE: BAC))

$55.3

144%

Citigroup (NYSE: C)

$157.6

125%

Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS)

$78.4

219%

JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM)

$140.8

96%

Wachovia (NYSE: WB) (being acquired by Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC))

$25.2

50%

Washington Mutual (being acquired by JPMorgan Chase)

$9.9

38%

Source: company SEC filings. *It’s important to note that not all Level 3 assets are mortgage-related.

The table shows that such losses have already exacted a huge toll, with several large institutions being folded into sturdier organizations. The firm that blazed the way down that walk of shame? John Paulson’s former employer, Bear Stearns, which was acquired for a pittance by JPMorgan Chase in May. One bank’s dreck is another man’s fortune -- provided he goes short at the height of the excess and long at the depths of despair.

Hedge funds have had a rough time recently. Here are my thoughts on how to profit from hedge fund selling.

More Foolishness:

"The most exciting development in my lifetime!" 15 years ago, Motley Fool founder David Gardner uncovered a secret that changed how he'd invest forever. It can make you money in up, down, and rollercoaster markets. To learn more, enter your email address now.

Think like John Paulson. Lower equity prices mean higher future returns for those who have the courage to invest in outstanding businesses now. The team at Motley Fool Inside Value can help you find those businesses. Their two latest stock picks were released this week -- check them out by taking a 30-day free trial now.

Alex Dumortier, CFA, has a beneficial interest in Wells Fargo, but not in any of the other companies mentioned in this article. JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America are Motley Fool Income Investor selections. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 02, 2008, at 12:06 PM, javnnf wrote:

    So this is how you get the readers to your page?

  • Report this Comment On December 02, 2008, at 12:19 PM, XMFMarathonMan wrote:

    Is there a problem?

  • Report this Comment On December 02, 2008, at 8:17 PM, GoNuke wrote:

    The problem XMFMarathonMan is precisely the fact that the author of this missive created a misleading headline. The author knowingly misled paid subscribers of financial advice into thinking that the secretary of the Treasury had called a bottom to the mortgage market. The implications of such an announcement would be monumental. It would signal that the government was ready to start buying up MBS's and that perhaps there would be a bidding war driving up the price of these toxic assets which would, in turn, have a positive impact on the global financial system.

    In essence the headline is a lie. It is a lie in an industry that is notorious for opaque behaviour. It is a lie from the mouths of our self appointed financial advisors.

    I used to advise people to subscribe to the Fool but now I am embarrassed to do so.

    Since I discovered Delloite's Fast 50 I am not sure I even need to subscribe to Rule Breakers anymore.

  • Report this Comment On December 02, 2008, at 8:22 PM, redneckdemon wrote:

    Who the hell cares about his views? I have yet to see him get anything right. If he was turning bullish now, I would be looking for another 10% drop tomarrow.

  • Report this Comment On December 02, 2008, at 8:49 PM, XMFMarathonMan wrote:

    GoNuke,

    Thanks for your comment.

    As far as "misleading paid subscribers of financial advice into thinking that the Secretary of the Treasury had called a bottom to the mortgage market", that is ludicrous claim:

    First, the article appears on the open section of the Fool.com website -- no-one need pay a cent to read it, as it is not restricted to TMF newsletter subscribers.

    Two, the article is financial commentary, NOT financial advice. I'm sure you will understand there is a substantial difference between the two.

    Three, I've not misled anyone into thinking anything. I explain in the first sentence of the first paragraph that I'm not referring to Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson. In the TITLE of the article, I play on the fact that John Paulson and Hank Paulson share the same surname to attract readers' attention. This is a standard journalistic technique, not a lie. Equating this with a lie is absurd and childish.

    In any event, as I alluded to in the article, I consider John Paulson's opinion of the mortgage market more meaningful than that of Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson.

    As a CFA charterholder, I am held to the highest standards of integrity in the work I do. I make every effort to uphold those standards and I don't much appreciate being called a liar.

  • Report this Comment On December 02, 2008, at 11:03 PM, XMFMarathonMan wrote:

    Jim,

    I think you know as well as I do that this is neither a half-truth, nor a lie.

  • Report this Comment On December 02, 2008, at 11:08 PM, cliffordfarquar wrote:

    If Henry Paulson were "early" and "right" why did he not do anything to enforce risk mitigation in financial companies that were leveraged 30-to-1 with these very assets? We are fortunate that Paulson will not be staying on at the treasury.

  • Report this Comment On December 02, 2008, at 11:21 PM, XMFMarathonMan wrote:

    Clifford,

    Thanks for your comment. It appears that you didn't read the article sufficiently carefully. The person who was "early and right" is John Paulson, not Hank.

  • Report this Comment On December 04, 2008, at 1:10 PM, wuff3t wrote:

    Alex,

    There must be days when you wonder why you bothered!

    Occasionally I read the comments to an article and wonder what all the fuss is about. This is one of those occasions. Yes, I thought you meant Hank P at first - but that was rather the point, wasn't it? Never mind, it took me only a couple of minutes to read the article and I felt neither cheated nor insulted afterwards. It's the content of an article that interests me, not its title.

    There seems to be a lot of anger and frustration around at the moment, and for some reason some of it ended up being unjustly directed at you. I'm not sure quite what you did to deserve it!

  • Report this Comment On December 04, 2008, at 1:13 PM, XMFMarathonMan wrote:

    wuff3t,

    Thanks for your words of support -- they are much appreciated!

  • Report this Comment On December 05, 2008, at 12:28 PM, HarleyR wrote:

    So if I am a normal investor, with a trading account, how would I go about profitting from this idea if I agree with John Paulson's sentiment of the mortgage market? What would you suggest I invest in - whether it be stocks, futures, etc...? Thank you.

  • Report this Comment On December 05, 2008, at 1:32 PM, commonsense1won wrote:

    How can mortgage meltdown hit bottom when millions are paying 10x the value for a surplus housing unit? With interest, they are paying 15x to 20x value. If you pay 300 dollars for a price inflated leather belt at 6 per cent interest, how is that better then paying 3 dollars for same leather belt at walmart?

    Over 22 million usa housing units are surplus and vacant. 1 in 4 more are going into foreclosure. When housing unit owners pay more then 28% of income for housing, many are paying 70 to 90% of income, they have no money to spend on other sectors, which then decline. Most home unit owners are upside down, thier 300,000 unit is now worth 100,000 and price still dropping. Many foreclosed homes today are selling for 10,000 to 30,000 and no one is buying. Supply and demand. More housing units then population demand means a glut of units that no one buys or rents. With 40 million usa workers going to be unemployed there is no hope for housing unit price recovery. Housing units cost 2000 to 40,000 to manufacture and build. I think Warren Buffet said he paid 43000 for his home 30 years ago and today it is worth 43000. The housing unit price inflators destroyed the market. Obama must set in place housing and rent and price controls nationwide. Greedy capatalists with the use of helmet head realtors and lying inflators/appraisors have massacred homeowners and buyers long enough. Add inflated real estate taxes and assessments and you have a housing nightmare, each unit so covered with human termites and bloodsucking human parasites all buyers have fled, walked away.USA becomes socialized or just let walmart into mortgage banking, and usa will recover when housing unit costs are 10 cents on the dollar fixed.

  • Report this Comment On December 05, 2008, at 3:13 PM, ursawil wrote:

    The headline got my attention - which is what it was supposed to do. And the first sentence explained the "two Paulsens."

    The best headline I ever heard of got every subscriber of a newspaper to read a small item about a mental patient who had escaped from a secure mental hospital after attacking a nurse. The headline? "Nut Screws and Bolts"

    The next day there were twenty subscription cancellations - and 300 new subscribers.

  • Report this Comment On December 05, 2008, at 3:28 PM, XMFMarathonMan wrote:

    ursawil,

    That was indeed the aim of the headline -- thanks for your words of support!

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 786048, ~/articles/articlehandler.aspx, 1/9/2009 5:54:07 AM

Sign up for FREE Motley Fool site access!

Already registered? Login Here

It’s FREE! Enter your email address, and we’ll rush you to the article you're looking for right now.

Privacy / Legal Information

We will use your email address only to keep you informed about updates to our web site and about other products and services that we think might interest you. The Motley Fool respects your privacy. Please read our Privacy Statement

.

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

What Fools Are Saying

Most Recommended

Jan 8 at 4:06 PM

Market Summary

DJIA 8,742.46 -27.24 -0.31%
S&P 500 909.73 +3.08 +0.34%
NASD 1,617.01 +17.95 +1.12%
Sponsored by:

Related Tickers

Bank of America Corp

CAPS Rating 3/5 Stars

$13.54

-0.17 (-1.24%)

Outperform6357

Underperform868

Rate This Stock