4 Key Steps for Economic Recovery

Recs

21

Be A Motley Fool Millionaire!

David Gardner's top pick took an epic run of 1,334%! See what he’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

With his recent rate cut to just about 0%, Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke has run out of bullets. Upon firing that last round, he predicted that the economy would remain weak for quite some time.

It's a pity he feels that way, especially since there's a simple, four-step plan that will do wonders to help get our economy back on track.

Step 1: Restore the Rule of Law
Perhaps the most devastating part of this financial crisis took place when Washington Mutual collapsed. When it handed WaMu's assets over to JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM), the FDIC trampled on the very important bankruptcy concept of "Absolute Priority." By shafting debt holders' claims in the deal, the government sent a very clear message that it was a bad idea to loan any money to companies that needed the cash.

It's no coincidence that the lending market froze shortly after the WaMu seizure, and it hasn't completely recovered since. For there to be any chance for the debt market to recover, whatever laws enabled that fiasco need to be rewritten to assure bond investors' due process rights to company assets in bankruptcy are protected. Otherwise, private interest rate spreads will remain high, no matter how much cash the Federal Reserve gives away.

Step 2: Protect the Innocent
That being said, the reason the FDIC acted the way it did was because its insurance fund was at risk of being depleted. It's certainly not the insured depositors' faults that the FDIC neglected its primary responsibility of assuring its insurance fund was adequately capitalized. Insured depositors rightly thought they had a government-backed guarantee on their savings.

If there were any legitimate use for bailout cash, it'd be to temporarily backstop the FDIC's insurance fund to assure insured depositors could be made whole. Even then, the bailout wouldn't have needed to be permanent. In bankruptcy reorganizations, liquidations, or court-supervised sales, the FDIC could have stood in line ahead of other creditors to be made whole.

Step 3: Restore Banks' Willingness to Lend
As part of its rescue attempts, the government has stopped foreclosures when it takes over failing mortgage lenders like IndyMac, Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM), and Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE). The strategy instead has been to modify loans to attempt to keep people in their homes.

Unfortunately, the track record of loan modifications suggests that strategy doesn't really work well. A recent study showed that around 53% of all modified loans again fell delinquent six months after modification, and 58% did so within eight months. To make matters worse, there are signs that some borrowers who can pay are intentionally skipping mortgage payments in order to get their loans renegotiated.

As predicted a year ago, banks are curtailing their lending in an environment where their contracts can be rewritten on a whim and they lose their main means to protect their investments. Without the ability to foreclose if someone fails to pay, banks have no incentive to make mortgage loans at low rates. Restore the credible threat of foreclosure and the lending market will have a real chance at recovering.

Step 4: Rein in the Federal Reserve
As the country's central bank and lender of last resort, the Federal Reserve should play a part in maintaining a functioning and healthy financial system. But when it hands out free money, it actively crowds out private capital.

For banks to ultimately recover they need to have the ability to attract deposits, not just coerced bailout cash and free Federal loans. But if a bank can get virtually unlimited supplies of essentially free money from the Feds, why would it keep offering rates above that to its depositors? As of December 16, the day the Federal Reserve shot its last bullet, this was all banks were offering to tie up your cash for a full year:

Bank

Rate

E*Trade (Nasdaq: ETFC)

2.08%

Capital One (NYSE: COF)

2.86%

Allstate (NYSE: ALL)

3.10%

Discover (NYSE: DFS)

3.39%

Source: Bankrate.com.

Since the Federal Reserve plans to aggressively buy government debt to lower rates, you can expect those savings rates to drop even further. If banks aren't offering much in the way of interest, what exactly is the incentive for people to deposit money? Without deposits, where can banks go to get money to lend?

The rational principles for a lender of last resort dictate that the Fed should be lending at penalty, not cheap interest rates. For the banking system to fully recover, those principles need to be restored.

Let the economy recover!
It's not rocket science -- just common sense and the restoration of the bedrock principles that have served our country and market for generations. Given how poorly the government's current strategy has fared, isn't it worth a shot?

“Make Big Money With Options” Motley Fool CFO Ollen Douglass recently made over $100,000 buying options on 7 well known stocks. Now we’re committed to turning his small fortune into a massive one! And we want you to join us! Enter your email address to hear more:

At the time of publication, Fool contributor Chuck Saletta owned shares of Discover Financial, and he also held some essentially worthless stubs of Washington Mutual. JPMorgan Chase is a Motley Fool Income Investor pick. Discover Financial Services is a Motley Fool Inside Value recommendation. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days. The Fool's disclosure policy has never defaulted on a loan.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 18, 2008, at 5:51 PM, GoNuke wrote:

    Dear Chuck

    You are falling into the same trap that economists do. They do not understand that economics is the study of human behaviour. All of the conventional wisdom regarding economics, business cycles, finance, investing etc. are based on assumptions regarding what people will do in a given situation. Those models are of very limited use when the majority of "units" in the economy are scared silly. This is compounded by the fact that this fear is global.

    To get back to the land where your model works we must employ a different model: one that changes how people feel. Once they are no longer terrified then your model may be of value.

    I would argue that all of you at the Motley Fool did not realize that your "investment" model was rendered worthless by the overarching global financial situation. You Fools are playing in a very small sandbox and your failure to realize the extent to which your experience and wisdom are limited to specific macro/global conditions is troubling.

  • Report this Comment On December 18, 2008, at 8:39 PM, guychan wrote:

    GoNuke,

    I'm with Chuck in that to restore sanity to this situation, those in power have to regain credibility, and in order to do that the rules have to be updated, relevant, clear, and enforced - to the letter. Otherwise, everything keeps going to hell in a handbasket. There is a disheartening and massive deficit of credibility and trustworthiness these days... it's gotta change first before we can crawl out of this hole...

  • Report this Comment On December 18, 2008, at 8:49 PM, TMFBigFrog wrote:

    Hi GoNuke,

    I appreciate your feedback -- but I don't think I'm exactly falling into a trap. You see, for any market to function well, the government needs to assure a level playing field and consistent rules. In many respects, the government's acts, supposedly to 'save' the market, have upended the playing field and rewritten the rules at a whim.

    As a result, there is no framework on which to rebuild the trust that is essential to the market's functioning. Until that framework for trust is restored, all the Federal cash in the world will likely be as effective as pushing on a string.

  • Report this Comment On December 18, 2008, at 8:50 PM, TMFBigFrog wrote:

    (or in other words -- what guychan said...)

  • Report this Comment On December 18, 2008, at 9:21 PM, dc46and2 wrote:

    Great article Chuck, very perceptive.

    GoNuke pointed out that human "feelings" have an impact on the operation of the economy. No one will doubt that fear is contributing to current economic conditions, but how do we change "how people feel"? No suggestions were given.

    Most people have little understanding of economic or financial matters outside their own personal budget. They assumed that there were competent individuals looking after those mysterious things. Then they find out that the so-called "experts" really had no clue either. The appraisers, bankers, regulators, and politicians were all wrong. Whether incompetent or powerless, they were unable to avoid the current mess. Now the rule of law is breaking down, contracts are broken, taxpayers are robbed, prices and currencies are volatile, jobs are being lost, the "DOW" is going down (which they are told is a bad thing), etc. Ultimately, fear and uncertainty are the effects of these things, not the causes.

    The best way to get rid of the fear is to remove the cause, and Chuck's four points sound like a good start.

  • Report this Comment On December 18, 2008, at 10:42 PM, wamuqd wrote:

    How many times have you seen a bank seized on a Thursday? How long did it take between the WaMu seizure and the "Bail out"?

    Why was the FDIC bargaining with suitors behind wamu's back while Wamu was trying to sell itself? Of course they couldn't sell with the FDIC telling potential buyers they're about to be seized and we'll offer you a better deal.

    1.9 billion for 300 billion in assets? That's laughable.

    If you got wamuq'd in this deal and youre, angry, frustrated, or just plain confused about how it happened and why... We NEED to hear your story.

    Visit wamuqd.com

    I

  • Report this Comment On December 19, 2008, at 1:09 AM, MFMerlin wrote:

    Chuck,

    Excellent points! I'm not sure that GoNuke actually disagrees with you. If your four points were actually implemented, we WOULD be employing a 'different model' than the one the government is currently using (as you correctly pointed out). This would 'change how people feel' and 'they would no longer be terrified'.

    The real problem, IMHO, is HOW do we get this to happen. I'm not greatly encouraged by the next administration's most recent appointments re Treasury, Federal Reserve, SEC. All seem to be holdovers of the 'government's current strategy'.

    I would argue that it is not the folks at the Motley Fool who do not understand that their investment model does not work, but rather the folks in the government who do not understand that their actions are making the situation worse.

    So, what's a Fool to do? How do we get the folks in charge to 'level the playing field'? Unfortunately, revolutions have a tendency to level that field. 'Ground zero' is pretty flat.

  • Report this Comment On December 19, 2008, at 5:18 AM, sdansker wrote:

    It would be nice if this author got the facts straight, e.g., E*Trade Bank now gives 3.3% on it's everyday savings account, well above 2.08%. I know, I've got it.

  • Report this Comment On December 19, 2008, at 12:00 PM, TMFBigFrog wrote:

    Hi sdansker,

    I apologize if my wording was not clear. The rates I was quoting were the 1 year CD rates (hence the "tie up your cash for a full year" wording), not the savings account rates.

    You'll notice that today, if you look at E*Trade Bank's web page ( https://us.etrade.com/e/t/banking ), the 1 year CD rates now are 1.80% -- below even the 2.08% I quoted from the 16th. It appears my prediction ("you can expect those savings rates to drop even further") is coming true even faster than I thought it would...

    Best regards,

    -Chuck

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 797436, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/1/2009 9:06:27 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
The Public Health-Care Plan's Problem

Related Tickers

11/30/2009 4:01 PM
COF $38.36 Up +1.12 +3.01%
Capital One Financ… CAPS Rating: *
DFS $15.46 Up +0.33 +2.18%
Discover Financial… CAPS Rating: **
FRE $1.03 Down -0.07 -6.36%
Freddie Mac CAPS Rating: *
ETFC $1.64 Up +0.05 +3.14%
E*Trade Financial… CAPS Rating: *****
JPM $42.49 Up +1.16 +2.81%
JPMorgan Chase & C… CAPS Rating: ***
ALL $28.41 Up +0.14 +0.50%
The Allstate Corp CAPS Rating: ***
FNM $0.88 Down -0.06 -6.38%
Fannie Mae CAPS Rating: *

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Naked position: A naked position is when one has a non-hedged position. It can also refer to some option positions.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!