4 Things Obama Can Do to Help the Economy

President-elect Obama campaigned on a platform of change. By golly, he's getting it. The economy can't find enough catastrophic changes these days. Wall Street's changed. Global trade has changed. Gas costs only a buck and change. Madoff investors have been reduced to spare change. I could go on.

I'm sure the new administration is already up to their ears in suggestions, but here are four more changes and ideas that should be considered to bolster the economy for the long term.

Have a long, hard talk with Ben Bernanke
The Federal Reserve's balance sheet has ballooned from $925 billion a year ago to $2.3 trillion today (here's a sobering look at how unprecedented this is). The rationale behind the surge is simple: In the past few months, the threat of deflation has come out swinging, prompting the Fed to double down -- lest the economy starts turning Japanese.

Nonetheless, there will come a day, however far off, when banks start lending again, consumers start spending again, and the perceived fear of inflation returns. If the Fed's balance sheet is still spilling money out of its pockets when that day arrives, the mother of all inflation episodes will be upon us -- no ifs, ands, or buts about it.

All hope doesn't have to be lost so long as Bernanke is Johnny on the spot removing excess liquidity before things start to pick up. Not during, not in the middle of, but before. That ultimately means raising interest rates while the economy's still limping. Politically unpopular as that may be, it's the only way to prevent a Japanese deflationary gauntlet from morphing into a Zimbabwean hyperinflationary war. Please, Ben, don't repeat Alan Greenspan's mistake of leaving rates too low for too long.

Up the gas tax
Raise taxes during a recession? Am I insane? Perhaps, but here's a parallel to draw: Cheap gas is a hidden stimulus that'll help consumers rebound in 2009, just as lower interest rates was the hidden "help" consumers needed to fuel their thirst for housing coming out of the last recession.

Getting addicted to anything artificially cheap can have disastrous consequences. Mortgages shouldn't have been made with a 1% teaser rate, and gasoline shouldn't cost $1.60 a gallon. Both are "stimulative" only until reality returns. And, boy, does reality ever return with a vengeance.

As Obama himself said, "Prices go back down, and suddenly we act like it's not important, and we start … filling up our SUVs again. And, as a consequence, we never make any progress." Sure enough, while overall sales at General Motors (NYSE: GM  ) , Ford (NYSE: F  ) and Toyota (NYSE: TM  ) have fallen off a cliff, SUV and truck sales are making marked comebacks.

Price -- perhaps augmented with taxes -- is the only thing that'll wean us off an oil addiction. Europe figured this out years ago.

Get tough on bailout funds
There's something wrong when Warren Buffett -- capitalist of capitalists -- can get General Electric (NYSE: GE  ) and Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS  ) to fork over preferred shares yielding 10% with 100% warrants to boot, while the government -- "lender of last resort" -- hands out preferred shares yielding 5% and warrants representing just 15% of the investment. I'm all for saving the financial system from systemic collapse, but when it's done at terms so lenient that relatively healthy companies like American Express (NYSE: AXP  ) start lining up, the threat of moral hazard becomes terribly apparent.

I understand the counterargument here: Onerous interest rates on preferred stock depletes much-needed capital from companies like Citigroup (NYSE: C  ) and AIG that were facing life-threatening cash crunches. So what's the solution?

Switch to common equity                                                                          
While infusing cash and safeguarding taxpayers, the preferred shares injected into banks don't allow the flexibility needed to write off bad assets and make more loans. Banks can't stomach massive writedowns when they're capitalized with what is in essence an enormous liability to the Treasury and a spit of tangible common equity.

That's likely why Citigroup needed bailout part deux. Just weeks after getting $25 billion in preferred stock, its tangible common equity was still so minute that the fear of collapse was alive and well. Sooner or later, banks are going to need real, tangible, common equity, and that's what the Treasury should provide.

The downside is that common stock doesn't protect taxpayers as much as preferred stock does. So why not force banks to issue non-voting common stock at a fat discount to market prices? And lots of it. Make 'em pay up. Doing so addresses three key issues: It recapitalizes banks with the common equity they need, buffers against taxpayer losses, and ensures that only those that have exhausted other options come begging for help. Companies shouldn't be drooling over the prospect of bailout funds.

Got any more recommendations? Fire away in the comment section below.

For related Foolishness:

Fool contributor Morgan Housel doesn't own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this article. American Express is a Motley Fool Inside Value pick. The Fool owns shares of American Express, and has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (5) | Recommend This Article (20)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 07, 2009, at 6:00 PM, ChinaKap wrote:

    You say, "Price -- perhaps augmented with taxes -- is the only thing that'll wean us off an oil addiction. Europe figured this out years ago."

    I hadn't heard Europe doesn't use gas anymore. What do they use, the socks missing from my dryer? They don't have dryers because electric costs so darn much there too. Let's be like the Europeans!

    And who precisely will buy the non-voting shares the government will, I presume, want to sell at some point? Or will they be converted to voting shares at some point? And if they do, will the government be the majority shareholder? I'd rather that the company be forced to redeem whatever the securities are so that they figure out how to become profitable quickly.

  • Report this Comment On January 07, 2009, at 7:20 PM, GoNuke wrote:

    ChinaKap

    Canada also imposed a gasoline tax back in the '70's which served to inflate gasoline prices and promote reduced consumption. Its effects are felt along the margins. Canada consumes less gasoline than it otherwise would have. Europe consumes substantially less than it otherwise would have. You should be grateful for that since a large portion of your gasoline comes from European refineries. They keep the diesel. If Europeans consumed more gasoline you would be paying a lot more for it now than you are.

  • Report this Comment On January 08, 2009, at 12:13 AM, jtmacker wrote:

    I'm glad that Obama is talking about taxes. I would like to see a FICA tax deduction for purchases of domestic products. For example cars and trucks produced by domestic manufacturers as well as shoes, electronics ect.. Is it fair that my best capitolist adventurer is that of a middle man for foreign companies?

  • Report this Comment On January 08, 2009, at 11:10 AM, robertf36009 wrote:

    King Paulson had the right idea to start with: namely buying up toxic debt from banks and getting it off of their balance sheets. That would have subsantialy eased the credit market as banks would no longer be in the dark about how much impending write downs would impact other banks and creating distrust among the banks. When he changed policy to buy stock instead he did nothing to alleviate the lack of trust between banks because all of that bad paper is still hanging over their heads like the sword of Damoclese. President elect Obama's strategie to spend on infrastructure is all well and good but may take three or four years to have any effect at all and no one knows what the market will look like then. Finaly if we don't begin drilling our continental shelf and ANWAR right now giving us leverage so we can increase or decrease our production to stabalize the prices here we will be in exactly the same position with OPEC that the Eurozone is finding itself in with regard to Russian natural gas.

  • Report this Comment On February 11, 2009, at 7:33 PM, xetn wrote:

    The four things O'bama should do in order of importance:

    1. NOTHING

    2. NOTHING

    3. NOTHING

    4. NOTHING

    You really are a "fool" for suggesting that more tax is a good thing. Please learn something about economics before you start making stupid suggestions. You might try http://mises.org for starters. They have hundreds of free articles and books that can make you think less like a socialist. An excellent book to start with is free to read at: http://jim.com/econ/contents.html.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 805556, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/28/2014 7:16:05 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement