Recs

10

3 Reasons This Rally Is Doomed

"Markets have gone up too much, too soon, too fast." -- Nouriel Roubini

Prof. Roubini, known for having predicted the economic crisis, proclaims he's cautious in the near term because of a weak economic recovery. George Magnus, economic advisor at UBS, agrees, saying, "This recovery is entirely dependent on the unprecedented largesse of governments and central banks ... the recovery is built on very short-term foundations."

This doubt about the economy is all well and good, but one only needs to look at the recent stock market recovery to find some seriously optimistic expectations.

We must be dreaming
Since the March lows, the MSCI World Index (ACWI) has climbed by 73%, and the S&P 500 has jumped 62%. Healthy companies like Caterpillar (NYSE: CAT  ) and Tyco International (NYSE: TYC  ) have rebounded more than 100% during that time, and bedridden stocks like AIG have been able to secure whopping 250% gains. Bulls are pointing to a fast, V-shaped recovery that will mirror the quickness of our slide into recession. Could a full recovery really be this immediate?

There goes the alarm
The short answer is no -- this can't be as prompt a recovery as some believe. Here are three reasons why I believe this rally is a castle made of sand:

  1. Deleveraging: Household balance sheets are fundamentally linked to property busts, which often take years to play out. People will continue to spend less and consume less as they realize the reduced worth of their assets. This is the ultimate hurdle as the economy struggles to grow, since consumer spending accounted for 70% of the economy in recent years.
  2. Government spending: Unfortunately, it seems as though our tax dollars have been behind much of the rally. Bears point to the fact that car sales slowed after the Cash for Clunkers program ended, and home sales will probably become sluggish when the first-time buyer tax credit extension expires next year. Also, as the threat of inflation increases, and the public becomes more concerned with the ballooning of the Fed's balance sheet, government spending will slow. Magnus states, "If you don't have credit growth operating, it is hard to sustain spending while unemployment is still rising." In other words: Let's not count on the government to get us out of this mess. 
  3. Interest rates: Central banks worldwide have kept interest rates as close to zero as possible, which has increased the flow of capital into the stock market. But many people believe low interest rates (cheap money) are one of the reasons we got into this fix and think the Fed will have to raise rates sooner than later. Would investors really be throwing their money into inconsistent and risky dividend stocks like Cherokee (Nasdaq: CHKE  ) if they could earn 5% or 6% with CDs like they could in 2006 and 2007?

This is no time to snooze
OK, so what can you do?

You can look for growth stocks, companies like Evergreen Solar (Nasdaq: ESLR  ) that operate in difficult and often unpredictable industries but that could generate great returns. But despite the market surge, Magnus argues, "the economy doesn't really go anywhere." Translation: This may not really be a great time for growth.

You can try to play it safe and look for dividend-paying stocks that have some possibility of appreciating in price. However, even steadfast, previously reliable stocks like Diageo (NYSE: DEO  ) and Fifth Third Bancorp (Nasdaq: FITB  ) have had to slash their dividends. It's difficult to know which dividend stocks you can count on in a turbulent yet recovering market.

The smart move is to follow in the footsteps of investing gurus like Benjamin Graham, Warren Buffett, and David Dodd. In any environment, good or bad, there will always be undervalued stocks -- the tricky part is finding them. Our analysts at Motley Fool Inside Value are constantly finding great companies that are selling below their true value. These companies are operating profitably, are trading cheaply, and have responsible and reliable management. In fact, many exhibit strong growth and pay a dividend -- so we can have the best of both worlds.

A few months ago our team recommended Sysco (NYSE: SYY  ) -- not the technology company, but the national leader in food distribution. Sysco delivers food to restaurants, hospitals, colleges, and hotels, and has more than 400,000 customers -- making it the largest such operation in North America.

During a time when companies are strapped for cash, Sysco consistently generates over $1 billion in free cash flow. Its margins are small -- but it has such massive economies of scale that it is able to manage its capital well and return money to shareholders. With 16% market share, the company has operating profits shockingly above the competition -- five times better than its closest competitor, and 21 times its No. 2 competitor. Trading for a 15 price-to-earnings multiple and a having a gigantic economic moat, Sysco seems like a great value stocks.

I can't lie -- in these uncertain times, our team has picked a few stocks that haven't turned out as we would have liked. But since inception in 2004, our picks have returned more than seven percentage points over the S&P 500, and we continue to work hard to bring you only the best of the best. Our analysts not only provide you with their recommendations, but they also tell you at what price to buy and at what price a stock is no longer a bargain. 

If you're interested in learning more about Sysco or seeing all of our past and present value recommendations, we're offering a 30-day free trial. Click here for more information.

Already a member of Inside Value? Log in at the top of this page.

Fool contributor Jordan DiPietro doesn't own shares of any of the stocks mentioned above. Sysco is a Motley Fool Inside Value choice. Diageo and Sysco are Motley Fool Income Investor picks. The Fool owns shares of Sysco.The Fool's disclosure policy is trading dirt cheap.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 28, 2010, at 4:18 PM, RogueAccountant wrote:

    I agree with the fact that the market has gone up too high, too fast. As a natural long, I tend to be optimistic, yet I remain cautious. At the beginning of the year my team invested heavily into solar companies and ETF's. About to weeks ago, we closed our long positions in most solars and reduced our positions in others, including ESLR. However, we recently added more ESLR at lower amounts in order to avg down. One look at ESLR's balance sheet and income statement and we noted that ESLR had the highest revenue growth among competitors, it also had the lowest profit margins. Translation, high operating expenses. The company is building new facilities in China and has entered into partnerships with Chinese manufacturers. This company is en route to profitability as it engages in agressive cost cutting measures. It is also streamlining operations and integrating some of its processes. The company is also moving key manufacturing operations from Devens, MA, where the avg assembly worker earns $42,600/yr. The avg savings from payroll expense will be around $37,600/yr. These savings, combined with the additional revenue derived from a $30M plus contract to supply the solar panels for Patriot place will have an almost immediate P&L impact.

    Metro PCS shares have fell about 59% in six months and is trading at an earning multiple of about 10.5. The avg PE for this industry is about 16. That is not taking into consideration TDS (PE=3.17, PS=.71), and USM (PE=1,051 & PS=.83). I figured that factoring these (outliers) into the "avg PE" calculation would result in a skewed number. I also want to point out that the P/S for PCS is .5...lower than both of these companies which have substantially higher PE's. PCS's current ratio, quick ratio, working capital, and EBITDA margin are well with healthy levels. In fact measures of liquidity and solvency indicated that PCS is far healthier than most of its competitors. So why has the stock taken such a huge hit?

    The main issues have been: 1) a slash to profit margins (due to a price war with competing carries) which in fact has affected the entire sector, and 2) increased short seller activity. In fact as of 1/15/10, the short interest has increased almost by 50% since 12/12/09, indicating that most of the recent sell-off was contrarian induced. This could be mean that the stock could slide further, but after setting a new 52wk low, and noting that this company is largely undervalued, based on the metrics mentioned above, this stock seems like a good opportunity.

  • Report this Comment On January 28, 2010, at 4:21 PM, RogueAccountant wrote:

    I agree with the fact that the market has gone up too high, too fast. As a natural long, I tend to be optimistic, yet I remain cautious. At the beginning of the year my team invested heavily into solar companies and ETF's. About to weeks ago, we closed our long positions in most solars and reduced our positions in others, including ESLR. However, we recently added more ESLR at lower amounts in order to avg down. One look at ESLR's balance sheet and income statement and we noted that ESLR had the highest revenue growth among competitors, it also had the lowest profit margins. Translation, high operating expenses. The company is building new facilities in China and has entered into partnerships with Chinese manufacturers. This company is en route to profitability as it engages in agressive cost cutting measures. It is also streamlining operations and integrating some of its processes. The company is also moving key manufacturing operations from Devens, MA, where the avg assembly worker earns $42,600/yr. The avg savings from payroll expense will be around $37,600/yr. These savings, combined with the additional revenue derived from a $30M plus contract to supply the solar panels for Patriot place will have an almost immediate P&L impact.

    Metro PCS shares have fell about 59% in six months and is trading at an earning multiple of about 10.5. The avg PE for this industry is about 16. That is not taking into consideration TDS (PE=3.17, PS=.71), and USM (PE=1,051 & PS=.83). I figured that factoring these (outliers) into the "avg PE" calculation would result in a skewed number. I also want to point out that the P/S for PCS is .5...lower than both of these companies which have substantially higher PE's. PCS's current ratio, quick ratio, working capital, and EBITDA margin are well with healthy levels. In fact measures of liquidity and solvency indicated that PCS is far healthier than most of its competitors. So why has the stock taken such a huge hit?

    The main issues have been: 1) a slash to profit margins (due to a price war with competing carries) which in fact has affected the entire sector, and 2) increased short seller activity. In fact as of 1/15/10, the short interest has increased almost by 50% since 12/12/09, indicating that most of the recent sell-off was contrarian induced. This could be mean that the stock could slide further, but after setting a new 52wk low, and noting that this company is largely undervalued, based on the metrics mentioned above, this stock seems like a good opportunity.

  • Report this Comment On January 28, 2010, at 4:26 PM, RogueAccountant wrote:

    One last comment related to the post above. As Michael Shulman so eloquently put it in his book "Sell Short"...(I'm paraphrasing) "...when things are so bad that they can't get any worse, they may in fact get better"

  • Report this Comment On January 28, 2010, at 5:35 PM, Hsub3 wrote:

    Small gains for years to come seems like what is going to happen.

  • Report this Comment On January 28, 2010, at 9:01 PM, NightTaxi wrote:

    i was a paid member of this motley fool, they've been saying the same thing since the rally started from 6500 all the way to 10700;

    they are good at bashing stocks and pumping their stocks such us WU.

    I will not buy any membership with those guys who's never tired of bashing and pumping their own interests.

  • Report this Comment On January 28, 2010, at 11:13 PM, RogueAccountant wrote:

    @NightTaxi. I wasn't aware that there is a paid service for Motley. In any event, I think you're most likely right when you say that people are good at pitching their stocks and bashing stocks they've shorted.

    I think it is fair to assume that most people who frequent this site are either long or short on a stock, and naturally they're going to pitch you their theory as to why a stock is poised to go up, or it is on its way down. Be that as it may, I like to be "full disclosure" when pitching my stocks. I do this for a living and countless hours go into market research and analysis. I was rather content with this article, because this has been the strategy my partners and I have been using (at least since the DOW crossed the 10K mark).

    Wish you the best of luck my fellow fool...

    @Hsub3, I agree with you.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1096911, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/27/2012 12:49:14 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
FITB $13.52 Down -0.05 -0.37%
Fifth Third Bancor… CAPS Rating: **
SYY $27.94 Up +0.14 +0.50%
Sysco Corporation CAPS Rating: ****
TYC $54.60 Down -0.36 -0.66%
Tyco International… CAPS Rating: ****
ESLRQ.PK $0.05 Up +0.01 +18.42%
Evergreen Solar, I… CAPS Rating: **
CAT $89.94 Down -1.48 -1.62%
Caterpillar, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
CHKE $11.70 Up +0.20 +1.74%
Cherokee, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
DEO $94.61 Up +0.54 +0.57%
Diageo plc (ADR) CAPS Rating: *****

Advertisement