Is Stock-Picking Dead?

Last month, I attended an investment conference in New York that brought together some of the luminaries of the value investing world, including Marty Whitman, the founder of Third Avenue Management and one of the deans of the business and William Browne of Tweedy Browne -- the company that used to execute trades for Ben Graham and Warren Buffett. As I listened to the panels of elite stockpickers, I was left with an unsettling question: As companies and governments continue to juggle with the aftermath of the greatest financial crisis since the Great Depression, is stock-picking dead?

Top-down or bottom-up?
Specifically, I was thinking about the investment implications of the sovereign debt burden of advanced economies. Under ordinary circumstances, the risks associated with government debt are not something value that investors spend any time thinking about -- but these are anything but ordinary times, and investors need to think about them.

Apparently, my concern wasn't academic. John Botham, the European equity head at Aviva Investors told the Financial Times at the beginning of this month that bottom-up stock pickers have been caught flat-footed as top-down, macroeconomic factors continue to drive stock returns this year.

Stock picking still matters, and significantly so
However, as I began to give the matter more thought, including an examination of specific data, it became clear to me that stock picking still matters and, in fact, it matters quite a bit more now than it did during the worst of last year's market downturn. Here's why.

What happened since March 2009
Since the March 9 market low in 2009, the spread in individual stock valuations has widened substantially across nearly all sectors, with energy, materials, health care, and telecoms experiencing the largest expansion. The following table illustrates this phenomenon on a sample of five well-known stocks in the health-care sector:

Company

Forward P/E at 2009 Market Low*

Forward P/E Today*

Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ  )

8.6

12.0

Bristol-Myers Squibb (NYSE: BMY  )

7.6

10.3

Eli Lilly (NYSE: LLY  )

6.2

7.4

Merck (NYSE: MRK  )

5.6

9.5

Pfizer (NYSE: PFE  )

5.4

7.6

Range

5.4 - 8.6

7.4 - 12.0

Source: Author's calculations based on data from Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's as of March 5.
*Based on Current Fiscal Year 1 earnings-per-share estimates.

Two reasons why stock picking ability matters now
These numbers exemplify why the ability to select individual stocks was much less important last March than it is now, for two reasons:

  1. Stocks were much cheaper then, as a group and on an individual basis. With a greater margin of safety, the likelihood of making a mistake when selecting a stock was much lower.
  1. The range of valuations was tighter. To illustrate the impact of this, let's take a look at an example from another sector, energy: At the market low in 2009, the P/E of Devon Energy (NYSE: DVN  ) and that of Pioneer Resources (NYSE: PXD  ) were identical at 3.6; last Friday, the former was 10.0, while the latter had risen to 18.3. If you had to choose between the two last March, you could concentrate on selecting the higher quality company. Today, things are much trickier -- you'd have to make a more complex judgment concerning what each stock is worth in order to determine the one that is more attractively priced.

Easy money out; hard work back in
At (or around) the market low, the key decision was to have exposure to stocks, period -- not which stocks to own. Now that stock valuations have widened out, the latter decision takes on a lot more importance, and stock-pickers are back in business. In a market in which the easy money has been made, investors must now recommit to the hard task of sorting through the market's offerings to find individual stocks that offer distinct value.

That's the same task that the team at Motley Fool Inside Value sets its sights on, day in and day out -- that's what they were committed to before this crisis began, and they haven't wavered one bit since then. They know that buying shares of superior businesses at or below fair value -- in any environment -- will produce market-beating returns over the long term ... and they have the track record to prove it. Significant uncertainty remains in this market -- along with opportunity. If you'd like to find out Inside Value's nine Best Buy Now stocks -- plus every other recommendation -- sign up for a 30-day free trial today.

Fool contributor Alex Dumortier has no beneficial interest in any of the stocks mentioned in this article. Pfizer is a Motley Fool Inside Value pick. Johnson & Johnson is a Motley Fool Income Investor pick. Motley Fool Options has recommended a buy calls position on Johnson & Johnson. Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (0) | Recommend This Article (13)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

DocumentId: 1136665, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/18/2014 6:04:32 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement