Recs

18

What You Don't Know About Berkshire Hathaway

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Recently, I found myself speechless as I read through the annual report for Great Northern Iron Ore Properties (NYSE: GNI  ) . I had been given a research report that rated the shares a buy and didn't mention anywhere that the trust will cease to exist on April 6, 2015. And yet there it was, clear as day, in the very first section of the company's 10-K.

This would be fine except that, considering the expiration date on the shares, there seemed almost no way to justify the share price at the time. My first thought was that investors must be getting very sloppy with their research. Then I started to wonder what else investors may not know about the companies that they're investing in or thinking about investing in. Companies like, say, Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-A  ) (NYSE: BRK-B  ) .

Reading through some of Berkshire's most recent Securities and Exchange Commission filings, here are a few things that you may have missed about Berkshire if you haven't bothered to crack open its filings.

The Berkshire Hathaway railroad company
We all know that the acquisition of Burlington Northern was a huge bite for Berkshire, but just how much does it change the company's business mix? During the third quarter, Burlington Northern contributed $1.1 billion to Berkshire's total operating income, as compared to $1.5 billion for the company's entire insurance group (GEICO, General Re, etc.).

Burlington Northern also dwarfed the other non-insurance businesses. The MidAmerican energy business registered $416 million in operating income, Marmon kicked out $212 million, and the "other businesses" category -- which includes a plethora of Berkshire-owned businesses from See's Candies to Fruit of the Loom and Dairy Queen -- totaled $844 million.

Warren Buffett is a business segment
Yes, I know, Warren Buffett is the chairman and CEO of Berkshire -- and he's just a person. But when you read through the Berkshire filings, Buffett comes off as if he's a business segment unto himself.

Here's what the quarterly filing has to say about Berkshire's insurance businesses:

Our management views insurance businesses as possessing two distinct operations -- underwriting and investing. Underwriting decisions are the responsibility of the unit managers; investing is the primary responsibility of Berkshire's Chairman and CEO, Warren E. Buffett. Accordingly, we evaluate performance of underwriting operations without any allocation of investment income.

This is interesting as it sets the insurance operations apart from competitors such as Allstate and Progressive (NYSE: PGR  ) . While their respective chief investment officers, Judith Greffin and William Cody, perform (somewhat) similar functions at their companies, you won't find any of their names anywhere in their companies' most recent quarterly SEC filings. Even Tom Gayner at Markel (NYSE: MKL  ) , a very sharp investor that many have likened to Buffett, doesn't get the same treatment.

I think this is notable as a reminder of how Berkshire has grown into a giant conglomerate that isn't completely reliant on the continued involvement of Warren Buffett. Sure, he may be better suited than most to invest the insurance float, and he pulls the trigger when new businesses are acquired, but the businesses that exist within Berkshire are independently operated and evaluated and should be able to continue clicking without the great Mr. Buffett.

Berkshire bonked by BP
After the BP (NYSE: BP  ) catastrophe in the Gulf of Mexico, Berkshire's reinsurance group ended up on the hook for some of the damages. Of the $158 million in catastrophe losses that Berkshire Hathaway Reinsurance Group recognized in the first nine months of 2010, most came from the Chilean earthquake in February and the BP oil spill.

A steal of an investment
When Berkshire agreed to invest a combined $8 billion in Goldman Sachs and General Electric (NYSE: GE  ) preferred shares that yielded 10% and included warrants to buy common stock, it made out like a bandit. Unfortunately, the big dividends from these companies may not last all that long, and Berkshire knows that investment opportunities like these don't come around every day. The company notes:

[O]ur investment in 10% GS Preferred may be redeemed at the option of Goldman Sachs at any time and our investment in 10% GE Preferred may be redeemed at the option of General Electric beginning in October 2011. Based on current market conditions, reinvestment of any redemption proceeds would likely generate significantly lower investment income in the future.

Not so keen on Nike
During the third quarter of last year, Berkshire reduced its investment in Nike by more than half. This is the kind of information that can be of note to both Berkshire shareholders -- as they watch how Buffett shapes the company's portfolio -- and Nike shareholders, as they are left to ponder why one of the world's pre-eminent investors shaved his stake so drastically.

Granted, this kind of information tends to be covered in a variety of sources when it's released, but how can you be sure that they're not skipping over a bit of the information that may be most informative to you? I'll tell you how -- by going directly to the filings yourself. Companies like Berkshire that have significant investment portfolios file a form 13F-HR that discloses information about the company's portfolio at the end of every quarter.

Keep digging
Certainly, there's much more to learn from a close read-through of Berkshire's filings, but these tidbits give you an idea of what you might uncover. I think there is great value in the news and analysis that you can find all over the Web (including on Fool.com!), but I also think all investors stand to gain by digging into SEC filings to better know the company they're invested in.

Here's something you won't find in Berkshire's filings -- a free report from my fellow Fools identifying three stocks that Mr. Buffett wishes he could buy.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Berkshire Hathaway and Nike are Motley Fool Stock Advisor picks. The Fool owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and Markel, which are Motley Fool Inside Value recommendations. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

Fool contributor Matt Koppenheffer owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and BP but does not own shares of any of the other companies mentioned. You can check out what Matt is keeping an eye on by visiting his CAPS portfolio, or you can follow Matt on Twitter @KoppTheFool or on his RSS feed. The Fool's disclosure policy prefers dividends over a sharp stick in the eye.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 19, 2011, at 10:01 PM, dqstolemoney wrote:

    Comments

    Dairy Queen Continues to Hammer the Small Guy - How's that Fair?

    Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on January 13, 2011 - 15:55.

    Further complicating these matters is the notion that a very large number of Dairy Queen franchises are governed by old, antiquated, and insufficient contracts. Thus, INDQ will see a lot more litigation over their alleged control of the brand, QSR location improvements, and general store operations. Many of these Franchisees operate under agreements originating (and then assigned) as early as the 1940's. These agreements call for "cents per gallon of milk mix" as when the primary business was making and selling an awesome ice cream cone. Modern day agreements are wrapped around transfer fees, signage specifications, brand usage, modernization plans, and even the color of the paint on the restroom walls. Get over yourselves!

    It should also be duly noted that the ownership structure of Dairy Queen, including a majority stake by Berkshire Hathaway, is a single point of failure as it relates to reputation risk. What might it be worth in terms of lost good will for a disenfranchised owner to show up at the Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting of Shareholders in a clown suit, huge signs displaying discontent, and flyers with cartoons of Warren Buffet counting his huge piles of DQ profits? National networks and the Money Show Pundents will eat that stuff up. Can you see W.B. trying to explain himself away on "In the Money?" Me thinks not!

    Lastly, what about another law suit from one of the "little Guys" who was trying hard to do the right thing, feed his family, and leave a legacy for his growing family? Who looks like the schmuck then? Moreover, who wants to eat in a restaurant whose reputation is one of being owned by "da Man" who rules with an iron fist and a massive legal checkbook?

    Haven't we seen enough of this bulling in our society, let alone hammering the small business person?

    Knock it off, Dairy Queen and get back to the business of making kids happy from the notion of a soft serve ice cream cone with their parents, siblings, and grand parents!

    reply

    .INDQ Puts Operator on COD - Say What?

    Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on January 17, 2011 - 15:08.

    So here's an interesting question to ponder.

    At what point is it legal for a large corporation like Dairy Queen to interfere with the vendor relationships of its franchisees? If, for the sake of a simple misunderstanding or even a greater contract dispute, is a Dairy Queen within its legal rights to demand a vendor put a store operator on payment terms? Is there some mysterious clause in one of their antiquated contracts from the 1940's that allows them to demand a supplier to revise credit terms to a store operator?

    Where is this all leading to? Does anyone think Warren Buffet would approve of such actions and business practices? Doesn't he visit a Dairy Queen nearly every day to enjoy his Blizzard treat? What if IDQ interfered with that Omaha store owner's credit and he wasn't open one day when W.B. walked down the street for his treat? Do you think someone at corporate would give a thought to that? How about when the old man gives them a ring and grabs a piece of their butts through the phone?

    What's it all coming to when the power brokers start to interfere with the store operator? Isn't that a conflict of interest? Isn't that the likes of Dairy Queen wielding the power of becoming or acting like an operator? If so, then they might as well just buy all the stores and operate them as a chain. Maybe that's what they plan to do anyway.

    I guess only time will tell....

  • Report this Comment On January 25, 2011, at 5:48 AM, midnightmoney wrote:

    Questioning the propriety of anything berkshire does will get you nowhere on this site, anonymous. Lionizing da mon WB for making a lot of money will on the other hand elicit heaps of agreement. See the comments in the caps section for brk. I say keep writing, I'm listening to you.

  • Report this Comment On January 31, 2011, at 8:16 PM, jdepolo wrote:

    This article is misleading. GNI shares may go away but the assets are distributed to owners (stock holders)...Fools should read to source for themselves before making decisions.

  • Report this Comment On March 23, 2011, at 9:16 PM, Glycomix wrote:

    Hi jdepolo,

    Consider this: buying a share of Great Iron Ore Properties (GNI) would cost you $126.28 today, but the Great Iron Ore Properties website says that the residual may be worth less than $8.25 when it's dissolved in four years from now April 16, 2015. http://www.gniop.com/termination.html

    Their last four years of dividends were $12.25, $8.00, $11.70, and $10.00. That totals to $41.95. Considering the time value of money, I'd estimate the present value of the stock at nearer to $41, than $126!

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1425449, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/27/2012 1:10:45 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 3:05 PM
GNI $62.89 Up +0.24 +0.38%
Great Northern Iro… CAPS Rating: *
MKL $433.69 Down -7.85 -1.78%
Markel Corp CAPS Rating: *****
PGR $21.61 Up +0.10 +0.46%
The Progressive Co… CAPS Rating: ***
GE $19.20 Down -0.05 -0.26%
General Electric C… CAPS Rating: ****
BP $38.36 Up +0.13 +0.34%
BP p.l.c. (ADR) CAPS Rating: ****
BRK-A $119500.00 Down -717.00 -0.60%
Berkshire Hathaway… CAPS Rating: ****
BRK-B $79.25 Down -0.55 -0.69%
Berkshire Hathaway CAPS Rating: *****

Advertisement