Rights of Contingent Beneficiary vs. Primary Beneficiary

How to ensure your assets go where you intend them to go upon your death.

Nov 15, 2015 at 12:07AM

If you've filled out paperwork for life insurance or a retirement account, you've probably come across the terms "primary" and "contingent" beneficiary. But what's the difference between the two concepts, and how do their rights affect the transfer of assets?

First, let's define the word that they both have in common: "beneficiary." A beneficiary is any person, trust, or entity that is designated by the financial account holder to receive some portion of the assets in the account after he or she dies.

Contingent vs. primary beneficiary
A primary beneficiary is simply first in line to receive the assets in the account, while the contingent beneficiary is next in line. There can be multiple primary and contingent beneficiaries, but contingent beneficiaries only receive their benefits in the event that none of the primary beneficiaries survive the account holder.

Here's a simple example.

A man passes away after accumulating $100,000 in a retirement account. He originally named his wife and brother as 50/50 primary beneficiaries but did not make any change to this designation after his brother passed away. The account holder also named his three adult children as contingent beneficiaries. In this instance, the man's wife would be first in line to receive all of the assets because of her status as a primary beneficiary.

Of course, the beneficiary designation process can get much more complicated from here -- by including trusts or by attaching conditions on a beneficiary's status, to name just two examples. But in each case the key distinction remains the same: Primary beneficiaries have first claim on the asset upon the account holder's death.

Why you should name beneficiaries
Even though naming a beneficiary, either primary or contingent, is optional for many retirement and insurance accounts, it's generally recommended that you take the time to do it. Otherwise, your passing might cause unnecessary probate expenses and delays for the heirs you intended to receive your assets.

It also might trigger a costly liquidation process. Many retirement accounts, for example, allow spousal beneficiaries to transfer an IRA into their own name and therefore delay required distributions until after age 70. Non-spousal beneficiaries, by contrast, are often required to begin taking distributions from the account immediately, which would lower the amount of time the assets can generate tax-differed growth. That's why it's important to be clear about whom you designate as your primary and contingent beneficiaries.

Common issues
According to a recent study by the U.S. Department of Labor, these are the two most common issues that can create disputes among heirs to an estate but are also in the account owner's power to avoid ahead of time:

  • Failing to change beneficiary designations to reflect life events. For example, after a marriage or divorce, many people forget to update their desired beneficiaries accordingly. Failing to do so can result in legal conflicts between current or ex-spouses and other potential beneficiaries.
  • Electing an impermissible beneficiary. A beneficiary must have the legal power to accept the asset that you've assigned to that person upon your death. That means that minor children and pets are won't work. For minors, the money will instead go to a legal guardian until the beneficiary reaches 18 or 21, depending on state law. In general, naming an entity that can't claim your asset will result in delays as the account manager works to establish the next legally appropriate beneficiary.

You can avoid these complications by taking the time to name primary and contingent beneficiaries when you open any financial account, and by periodically reviewing these designations to ensure that they still reflect your current wishes.

The $15,978 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook
If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. In fact, one MarketWatch reporter argues that if more Americans knew about this, the government would have to shell out an extra $10 billion annually. For example: one easy, 17-minute trick could pay you as much as $15,978 more... each year! Once you learn how to take advantage of all these loopholes, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Simply click here to discover how you can take advantage of these strategies.

This article is part of The Motley Fool's Knowledge Center, which was created based on the collected wisdom of a fantastic community of investors based in the Foolsaurus. Pop on over there to learn more about our Wiki and how you can be involved in helping the world invest, better! If you see any issues with this page, please email us at knowledgecenter@fool.com. Thanks -- and Fool on!

Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information