Recs

1

Ford Falls. Hard.

I'm confused. Haven't we known for decades that, with the majority of the oil we use coming from overseas, we were perched atop a banana peel that could bring us down any day? Why, then, are the automobile manufacturers just now scrambling to lop heads, cut production, retool plants, and provide the public with cars that will never need a fill-up?

Take Ford (NYSE: F  ) , for instance. Yesterday, the company announced its worst quarter since the company was a gleam in Henry's eye -- an $8.7 billion loss. Ford then said it will retool a couple more of its North American truck and sport utility vehicle plants so that it will be able to gin out a half-dozen fuel-efficient models that it has been making and selling in Europe for a while now.  But rolling those models off U.S. assembly lines is a couple of years away.

Fully $8 billion of the company's loss involved write-offs and write-downs reflecting the plummeting value of its plants, its lease portfolio, and some of its other assets. That means that, if you back out those cuts, rather than its reported loss of $3.88 per share, the company "only" lost $0.62 a share. Turns out the dart-throwers who follow the company had been looking for a per-share loss closer to $0.27. Why bother, guys?

Of course, Ford isn't alone in its automotive misery. In fact, a mixed bag of Daimler AG (NYSE: DAI  ) , AutoNation (NYSE: AN  ) , and Hyundai also have seen their profits fall.  And looking ahead, if you think General Motors (NYSE: GM  ) will depart from the use of rose-colored ink when it reports, I have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale. Beyond that, while Ford can be criticized for being slow to glom onto the importance of fuel efficiency, even normally canny Toyota (NYSE: TM  ) has only recently decided to begin building its Prius hybrid in the U.S.

So there you have it. In a word, a mess. Unless crude prices continue to trickle lower and find a home at much reduced levels, I don't think it's outlandish to suggest that Ford's situation appears precarious. And that will be the case at least until it can begin cranking out its more fuel-efficient models from here in the ol' U.S. of A. The investment implications of those circumstances are obvious.

Ford's been placed in the single-star inferno by Motley Fool's CAPS players. If you disagree, why not tell us about it?

For related Foolishness:

Best Odds in the Universe!
If you're interested in a 98.79% chance at beating the market... and a 70.84% chance at DOUBLING the market's return – Motley Fool Supernova could be just what you're looking for. And get this: We arrived at these odds from 10,000 random back-tested portfolios composed of Motley Fool Co-founder David Gardner's personal stock picks.

It's why David recently handpicked a small team of world-class portfolio managers. You see, he thinks these odds can get even better! And he'd like to prove it to you...

Simply enter your email address. And the answer to the question everybody is asking will be delivered to your inbox!

Fool contributor David Lee Smith has a couple of cars, but no shares in the companies mentioned. He does welcome your questions or comments. The Fool has a disclosure policy that purrs along in any gear.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 26, 2008, at 11:44 AM, weiwentg wrote:

    For whatever mysterious reason, the good folks at Dodge and Cox disagree. As of last report, they had about 1.5% of assets in the Stock fund in Ford and GM combined. That position is likely smaller by now. Not sure what they're smoking, but I've always maintained that at least one of the Big 3 is going to die within the next decade. That would probably make things better for the Big 2, but they would also have to adapt their product mix to cope with the reality of high gas prices. It isn't totally fair to place all the blame on GM and Ford for insisting on foisting monster trucks off on American consumers - the latter were rather enamored of SUVs and pickups. But the Big 3 have shown a refusal to face reality and adapt, and they will need to do so to make me even consider investing in the future.

  • Report this Comment On July 27, 2008, at 8:37 AM, TMFMarlowe wrote:

    David, with all due respect, you've completely missed the story here. Waving your hands and complaining that an industrial giant with eye-popping legacy costs and products that, like most of its competitors, take 24-36 months to go from approved idea to Job One, can't turn on a dime is overly simplistic. As for being "slow to glom on to the idea of fuel efficiency", they've been offering hybrids for several years. Maybe you missed that -- in Ford fashion, they're understated, not hyped as lifestyle objects like TM does -- but they're out there, and the Escape in particular is quite good. (Speaking of TM, you HAVE noticed that Toyota bet heavily on a 370 horsepower pickup truck in the US market just as oil spiked and got burned, haven't you? Of course, their global operations will pad the hit -- just as Ford's are doing.)

    What's really going on here is profound. Led by an insider with a mindset unusual in American business, Ford is remaking its culture top to bottom while leveraging its still-vast global resources and making the whole mess dance as one company for the first time ever. That's huge. Can't you see it?

    I think Ford will not only survive, but thrive. I think Alan Mulally is one of the most interesting CEOs in American business right now, and I really look forward to reading his "How We Saved Ford" book in ten years. This guy is different, very different. Can you see why?

    Whether the stock is a buy right now is a different question -- Cramer's point about the potential for dilution down the road is well taken, for once (stopped clocks, etc) -- but this is a company worth watching very closely. All of a sudden their "turnaround" is far ahead of GM's (Chrysler is teetering on hopeless at this point) -- and ahead of a lot of big overseas players too.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 693277, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 2/13/2012 1:24:39 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,867.94 66.71 0.52%
S&P 500 1,351.00 8.36 0.62%
NASD 2,926.27 22.39 0.77%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

2/13/2012 12:50 PM
F $12.54 Up +0.10 +0.80%
Ford CAPS Rating: ****
GM $25.36 Down -0.14 -0.55%
General Motors Com… CAPS Rating: **
TM $78.91 Up +0.52 +0.66%
Toyota Motor Corp… CAPS Rating: ***
AN $36.12 Up +0.01 +0.01%
AutoNation, Inc. CAPS Rating: *
DAI $47.42 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Daimler AG (USA) CAPS Rating: *

Advertisement