Recs

6

This Airline May Have the Right Idea

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Plenty of companies will breathe a big sigh of relief if stronger business spending comes back soon. But whether the economy is firing on all cylinders or falling like a brick, airlines seem engaged in a perpetual mad scramble for elusive profits.

Yesterday, Southwest Airlines (NYSE: LUV  ) was the first of a handful of its peers to report earnings for the late summer months. Most of them, including Delta Air Lines (NYSE: DAL  ) , US Airways (NYSE: LCC  ) , and Continental Airlines (NYSE: CAL  ) , are expected to beat last year's same-quarter adjusted earnings.

As is so often the case, though, Southwest was the exception. Analysts predicted the company would post earnings of $0.02 per share, or a decline of 78%. If you take out special items related to fuel hedging and the company's employee early-out program, Southwest managed to beat Wall Street's numbers by a penny. Taking those special items into account, Southwest lost $0.02 per share on revenues that fell 7.8% to $2.67 billion.

Black sheep
To be clear, Southwest still looks pretty good compared with the other airlines. Of the carriers listed above, only Continental is expected to eke out even a modest profit. Yet since reporting a year ago its first quarterly loss in 17 years, Southwest has clearly struggled to return to its winning ways.

Foremost, other carriers have been raking in cash through surcharges that have helped insulate their top lines from the dwindling numbers of business travelers. Southwest has famously stated in advertising that bags fly free, although Southwest still does charge extra for some things, like heavy bags, pets, unaccompanied minors, and use of its EarlyBird Check-in system.

Very clever
Yet that's one of the ways Southwest goes about differentiating itself from competitors without losing big money. While other airlines get jeers from customers for baggage charges, which customers interpret as a forced tax, Southwest instead tries to get customers to fork over their extra cash voluntarily for perks. It's a psychological but very real benefit, and if recent comments from CEO Gary Kelly are any indication, you could see similar features appear in a revamped frequent-flier program in the future.

Personally, I think such ideas reveal the innovative thinking that people have come to expect of Southwest's management, and they might even work. Airlines like Delta, JetBlue (Nasdaq: JBLU  ) , and UAL's (Nasdaq: UAUA  ) United Airlines have found customers receptive to buying carbon offsets, as has delivery company UPS (NYSE: UPS  ) . So it's reasonable to believe that people will pay extra for perks from which they'll get a more immediate benefit. If so, it may help Southwest emerge faster from one of the most difficult periods in its history.

Further reading:

Best Odds in the Universe!
If you're interested in a 98.79% chance at beating the market... and a 70.84% chance at DOUBLING the market's return – Motley Fool Supernova could be just what you're looking for. And get this: We arrived at these odds from 10,000 random back-tested portfolios composed of Motley Fool Co-founder David Gardner's personal stock picks.

It's why David recently handpicked a small team of world-class portfolio managers. You see, he thinks these odds can get even better! And he'd like to prove it to you...

Simply enter your email address. And the answer to the question everybody is asking will be delivered to your inbox!

United Parcel Service is a Motley Fool Income Investor recommendation. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days.

Fool contributor Chris Jones owns no shares of any company mentioned in this article. It's not on until The Motley Fool disclosure policy says it's on.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On October 16, 2009, at 3:55 PM, h39291h wrote:

    Bag charges...hmmm it's all how you look at it...

    Delta Air Lines charges you for the services you use. If you want to check a bag...there's a charge to offset the fuel burned to carry the extra weight of that bag.

    There's no charge if you only have carry-on bags!

    At Southwest you are charged the same price whether you check a bag or not...so those who only have carry-on bags are paying for a service they are not using. Where's the outrage at that?

    If I were writing a commercial for DAL I would have two passengers checking in at a Southwest ticket counter. Both are charged $199 to go to a certain city. The first passenger checks two bags the second passenger checks no bags. The second passenger then asks, "Hey why am I being charged the same ticket price as the guy who checked two bags? That doesn't seem fair.

    The commercial would end with a Delta ticket agent saying, "at Delta you only pay for the services you use"....or something like that...

    Just a thought...

    H39291h@yahoo.com

  • Report this Comment On October 16, 2009, at 4:06 PM, 73mike wrote:

    Maybe because at Delta they would charge you the same $199 then add the fee's. A baggagae fee, holiday fee etc. Would they show that in the same commercial? I dont think so.

  • Report this Comment On October 16, 2009, at 4:10 PM, GeeBee2010 wrote:

    Sorry, this article is a non starter. As other analysts have pointed out and you can verify it for yourself in the DOT figures, Southwest's market share, RPM's, ASM's, and Load Factor have tracked exactly with the rest of the industry both up and down. Not charging for bags has had no effect for Southwest other than missing revenue they otherwise might have collected. It has not resulted in any competitive edge.

  • Report this Comment On October 17, 2009, at 9:08 AM, h39291h wrote:

    I disagree 73mike...because Delta Air Lines CASM's is actually cheaper than Southwest, mainly due to much lower labor costs; Delta charges very competitive fairs when compared to Southwest.

    Bottom line Delta charges for the services provided. If you want to check bags there is a charge. If you want WiFi you have to pay. If you want to watch a movie you have to pay. If you want to drink a beer or eat a sandwich you have to pay. It is left to the customer to decide which services they would like...and Delta even offers free live TV, unlike Southwest which doesn't even have that capability.

  • Report this Comment On October 19, 2009, at 10:22 AM, Fool wrote:

    How many people have the option of checking zero bags on vacation, especially people with families?

  • Report this Comment On October 19, 2009, at 2:57 PM, h39291h wrote:

    Actually most folks travelling domestically aren't on vacation. They're travelling on short business trips. Now of course there are certain days, certain holidays where many passengers are travelling on vacation, but that is not the normal everyday airline traffic. The business traveller can "carry-on" in most cases.

    btw I've been travelling decades without checking a bag. Even on vacation with my family.

    H39291h

  • Report this Comment On October 20, 2009, at 5:11 PM, OhSure wrote:

    Instead of whining about bag charges, etc., why not take a close look at what it cost to fly ten or twenty years ago.

    Right now airlines charge about 20% of what they charged in the past and customer continue to complain.

    If you really think you're getting the shaft I have a suggestion: Drive and see what that costs you.

  • Report this Comment On October 22, 2009, at 3:46 PM, edub21 wrote:

    Bag, food, entertainment fees don't bother me as much as the steep $150 change penalty per ticket that most airlines except Southwest charge these days. If you need to change tickets for a family of four on another carrier it will set you back $600 plus fare difference. WTF? Why subject yourself to this BS when Southwest's fares are comparable to economy fares on other airlines?

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1009650, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 2/14/2012 1:05:54 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,826.81 -47.23 -0.37%
S&P 500 1,346.72 -5.05 -0.37%
NASD 2,918.85 -12.54 -0.43%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

2/14/2012 12:34 PM
LUV $9.57 Down -0.15 -1.54%
Southwest Airlines CAPS Rating: ***
LCC $9.10 Down -0.08 -0.92%
US Airways Group,… CAPS Rating: *
UAUA.DL $0.00 Down +0.00 +0.00%
UAL Corp CAPS Rating: *
UPS $76.89 Down -0.28 -0.36%
United Parcel Serv… CAPS Rating: ****
CAL.DL $0.00 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Continental Airlin… CAPS Rating: *
DAL $11.01 Down -0.14 -1.26%
Delta Air Lines, I… CAPS Rating: *
JBLU $5.86 Down -0.06 -1.01%
JetBlue Airways CAPS Rating: **

Advertisement