What Netflix Investors Don't Know Could Hurt Them

Shares of Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX  ) have been on a tear for the past six months, skyrocketing from $90 to well over $200 in that time span. While Netflix has delivered two strong quarterly reports so far in 2013, investors have also cheered nearly every content-related announcement, sending the stock into the stratosphere.

NFLX Chart

Netflix 6 Month Price Chart, data by YCharts

Netflix's announcement last week that it would premiere a number of new series to be created by DreamWorks Animation (NASDAQ: DWA  ) was no different. Netflix shares gained more than 7% on the day the deal was announced. Investors clearly believe that by adding content -- and especially original and exclusive content -- Netflix can differentiate itself from competitors like Amazon.com (NASDAQ: AMZN  ) , boosting subscriber growth.

However, exclusive content is very pricey, compared to non-exclusive deals: Original content is especially expensive. This should not be very surprising; content creators and owners obviously charge more for exclusivity, since it prevents them from selling their wares to other streaming video services.

Yet for competitive reasons, Netflix never reveals the cost of new content agreements. This means that investors are only getting half of the story. Everybody wants high-quality content; the important question is whether it comes at the right price. Unfortunately, that's still a big question mark for investors.

Cash or plastic?
Netflix's streaming content costs are already very high, as the company has invested heavily in building a robust content library that appeals to many people. However, content costs have begun to escalate even more rapidly recently. There are two related causes. First, competitors like Hulu and Amazon have been bidding more aggressively for content in the past year. Second, to fend off these competitors, Netflix has been investing in exclusive and original content, which is more expensive.

As a result, Netflix's streaming content liabilities increased from $4.82 billion to $5.63 billion over the course of 2012. Near-term streaming liabilities (due within a year) rose even faster: from $1.71 billion to $2.30 billion.

The combined costs of original content investments and international expansion have caused free cash flow to turn negative at Netflix. As a result, Netflix has started tapping the capital markets to finance its content expansion. In late January, the company sold $500 million of new debt, with more than half of the proceeds allocated to "general corporate purposes" such as content acquisition. Management has refused to rule out raising additional debt to fund future original programming.

The $13 billion question
Netflix has been booking small accounting profits recently, but free cash flow has remained negative. To justify its current valuation around $13 billion, Netflix will have to turn its free cash flow around and boost its operating margin well beyond last quarter's 3% level. In essence, the company needs to grow its streaming revenue faster than content expense increases.

This is why the stock's recent run-up seems somewhat misguided. There's no doubt that adding new series like the recently announced DreamWorks children's offerings will boost subscriber numbers (all things being equal). However, the cost side of the equation is still unknown. As I pointed out last week, Netflix's signature original series -- House of Cards -- reportedly cost the company $4 million per hour. At that rate, the DreamWorks deal would cost more than $1 billion!

The moment of truth
Ultimately, the moment of truth could still be years away. Netflix has been busy locking in long-term deals for high-quality content -- especially originals -- betting that they will produce the subscriber growth necessary to offset the high upfront costs. However, if Netflix's addressable market is smaller than management expects (as analysts at Sanford Bernstein recently argued), Netflix could see subscriber growth tail off in a year or two while content costs continue to march higher.

This is a big underappreciated risk for Netflix investors. Recently, the company has managed to walk a tightrope by investing heavily in content but growing the subscriber base just as quickly. However, as the company locks itself into more and more long-term, expensive content deals, there is an increasing chance that a mismatch could develop between content costs and streaming revenue. If that problem ever materializes, Netflix investors will be in for some rough sledding.

Learn more
The television landscape is changing quickly, with new entrants like Netflix and Amazon.com disrupting traditional networks. The Motley Fool's new free report "Who Will Own the Future of Television?" details the risks and opportunities in TV. Click here to read the full report!


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (12)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 29, 2013, at 4:09 AM, The1MAGE wrote:

    The only thing I am worried about with Netflix is their borrowing funds, although it is currently cheap to do so. But that still spends future income today.

    The Current strategy is growth. They are locking in future deals now, and expanding into the world market, and that is costing money today.

    I do not doubt they are watching their numbers very closely. I personally will keep an eye on their subscriber numbers. As long as those numbers keep climbing I won't be too worried.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2511859, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/2/2014 7:57:48 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement