That's a lot, but I don't think Visa will be spending too much time down in the dumps. It should make a brilliant comeback once this disquieting bit of news is digested by investors -- and here's why.
The real issue behind the ruling
When the Dodd-Frank law took a look at debit card interchange fees back in 2011, the charge imposed each time a customer swiped his card was around $0.44. Since then, the fee has been capped at $0.21 per transaction, but retailers sued, claiming the original cap envisioned by Congress was much lower. In fact, the initial cap proposed by the Federal Reserve -- the target of the lawsuit -- was $0.12, but was increased when banks pressured the Fed to bump it up.
Though you might expect retailers to experience some savings from the new, albeit higher-than-expected cap, the group claims that their costs have actually increased. For stores that process small purchases, for example, the days of negotiating tiny swipe fees for minuscule purchases are now in the past, thanks to the fee-cap law -- which retailers claim unfairly inflates each debit card transaction.
Who benefits from swipe fees?
But in reality, it's not companies like Visa and MasterCard (NYSE: MA ) that make the lion's share of the profit from interchange fees. Banks pay the card companies to use their system, but the card issuers set the fees. They also collect them, forwarding the money to the card-issuing banks.
This is not a surprise, since it was intense lobbying by banks that prompted the Fed to raise the cap by $0.09 in the first place. Banks like Bank of America (NYSE: BAC ) , Citigroup (NYSE: C ) , and JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM ) are some of the biggest card-issuing banks, and the industry claims that reducing the cap will impact their interchange fee revenue by 45%. Analysts interviewed by Forbes estimate that Citi and JPMorgan won't feel the pinch very much, but B of A could see its core earnings per share dented by as much as 3.6% if the cap is lowered to 12%.
Visa won't stay down for long
The ruling hit Visa hardest since MasterCard makes less of its revenue from debit cards than its rival. But neither card purveyor should suffer economically from a change in the interchange cap -- which will stay as it is until this issue is resolved, anyway.
While it is certainly possible that banks would try to renegotiate the fees they pay to Visa and MasterCard to use their networks if a smaller cap is instituted, the relationship is at least as lucrative to banks as the card companies, and I don't think putting that situation at risk is something banks have on their priority lists. Banks have an uncanny talent for making up revenue lost to regulation, at any rate -- just look at the pots of money they are still raking in on overdraft fees.
I believe that, once this news is digested, Visa shares will rebound. After all, it wasn't much more than one week ago that Visa presented investors with sweet second-quarter earnings, beating estimates on both earnings and revenue. I don't see this blip bothering the credit card giant for very long at all.
Higher fees are no fun, but escalating taxes are harder for most of us to avoid. Tax increases that took effect at the beginning of 2013 affected nearly every American taxpayer. But with the right planning, you can take steps to take control of your taxes and potentially even lower your tax bill. In our brand-new special report "How You Can Fight Back Against Higher Taxes," the Motley Fool's tax experts run through what to watch out for in doing your tax planning this year. With its concrete advice on how to cut taxes for decades to come, you won't want to miss out. Click here to get your copy today -- it's absolutely free.