Here's Why Intel's Cherry Trail Was Missing at Computex 2014

At Computex 2014, Intel (NASDAQ: INTC  ) demonstrated a whole host of tablet-related technologies, from its Bay Trail system-on-a-chip launched late last year, to the more recent Merrifield and Moorefield chips intended for both Android phones and tablets. While the designs and the chips were certainly impressive (indeed, some of the design wins that Intel has look exceptionally compelling), one upcoming product, known as Cherry Trail, was conspicuously absent at the event.

Hey, what's a Cherry Trail again?
For a more detailed look, see my article "A Tale of Intel's Cherry Trail," but Cherry Trail is a tablet-oriented system-on-a-chip targeted toward the higher end of the tablet market. It's Intel's first low-power system-on-a-chip built on the company's 14-nanometer FinFET process and should sport significant improvements in graphics, video encoding and decoding, and memory bandwidth, as well as a pretty healthy bump in CPU performance as this part introduces the next-generation Airmont CPU core.

Source: VR-Zone.

In terms of performance, it's hard to imagine that this part won't be best-in-class, particularly as the CPU performance in the prior-generation Bay Trail is still world-class nine months after its launch. Further, Intel appears to be bringing in an all-new graphics architecture (Gen. 8) and will be packing roughly four times the graphics "cores" as in the prior-generation Bay Trail product. In short, from what we've seen leaked, this thing should be an absolute performance monster.

Where is it, then?
In Mobile and Communications Group VP Hermann Eul's keynote at Computex 2014, the executive confirmed that Cherry Trail would launch at the end of the year, although this doesn't directly contradict CEO Brian Krzanich's claim that this product would ramp during the first half of 2015. Further, import and export data from Zauba suggests that Intel is producing quite a few Cherry Trail parts, so it's not as though Intel couldn't have trotted a reference tablet on stage if it wanted to. The question, then, is why Intel didn't show this product off.

Let's be honest; there was no need
Intel's progress in tablets has been quite superb over the past several months. It now has complete control over tablets powered by Microsoft's (NASDAQ: MSFT  ) Windows 8.1 and has been able to enable such devices at even the $100 price point. The argument that Windows RT (powered by ARM Holdings (NASDAQ: ARMH  ) -compatible chips) would be required for such price points has now been thoroughly debunked. Bay Trail looks wildly successful on the Windows front.

Further, while ARM-compatible chips dominate the Google (NASDAQ: GOOG  ) (NASDAQ: GOOGL  ) Android tablet landscape, Intel's partners demonstrated a broad swath of very competitive products based on both the Bay Trail silicon (which works on both Windows and Android) as well as the Android-only Merrifield and Moorefield intended for both tablets and phones. While some will claim that Intel is "giving away" these chips, the fact is that the performance on these products is very strong, lending credence to Intel's claims that the contra-revenue offsets are really just that -- to offset a high platform bill of materials.

In short, Intel's design win and product lineup in tablets is strong enough today that the company probably saw no need to talk up future parts.

Foolish bottom line
As a technology enthusiast and Intel investor, I would have found it interesting to see the first 14-nanometer low-power system-on-a-chip in action at Computex. However, given that the current 22-nanometer lineup is surprisingly competitive and is gaining some real traction in tablets that people might actually want to buy, it ultimately turned out to not be necessary. 

Leaked: Apple's next smart device (warning -- it may shock you)
Apple recently recruited a secret-development "dream team" to guarantee that its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out, and some early viewers are even claiming that its everyday impact could trump the iPod, iPhone, and the iPad. In fact, ABI Research predicts that 485 million of these devices will be sold per year. But one small company makes this gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and to see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here!


Read/Post Comments (4) | Recommend This Article (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 10, 2014, at 1:58 AM, DaMuncher wrote:

    Exactly,

    Why repeat the Broadwell fiasco ? Show off first goods in Sept 13, ship in product in late 2014, while Osbournizing your current product line. Guessing we will see Cherry Trail products in mid 2015.

  • Report this Comment On June 10, 2014, at 8:21 AM, pk22901 wrote:

    "The argument that Windows RT (powered by ARM Holdings (NASDAQ: ARMH ) -compatible chips) would be required for such price points has now been thoroughly debunked."

    Isn't this part of Intel contra-revenue assist program? Intel is losing serious money on these chips to get them into tablets.

    How is this a complete refutation?

  • Report this Comment On June 10, 2014, at 8:31 AM, keeperoftheq wrote:

    How is it working out for Intel selling these chips below cost?

  • Report this Comment On October 09, 2014, at 6:28 PM, hlu001 wrote:

    Not necessary???!!! No!!!! Unless Intel has not realized how bad their baytrail chips are, intel should launch 14nm cherry trail as soon as possible! Looking at all the baytrail devices, which one can fluently run a medern 3D game with even lowest graphic effect, None. And which one has a 10 hours' battery life? Only Asus T100(However, with the help of thickness for battery and low screen resoluation). How about braswell which was recently launched? It is claimed to have a 4.5W TDP. It has good performance(better than current Core i3 chips) for laptops but not for windows tablets. with windows OS, the CPU is usually full-loaded. Considered the power consumption additional to CPU, the screen, harddrive, and peripheral chips also power consuming. So, I can conclude a platform with Core M is easy to reach 6-8W power, which requires at least a 48wh battery to form a decent battery life tablet. I can accept a chip with half performance as Core M. So, I'm waiting for cherry trail anxiously!

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2988250, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/22/2014 6:24:11 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement