Analysts Hate This Stock

Recs

88

Analysts hate Ambassadors Group.

At least, that's what it looks like -- only three analysts are covering the stock. This company, which arranges domestic and international educational travel for students and professionals, has seen revenue climb almost 20% over the last few years. It has zero debt on its balance sheet, a return on equity of 26%, and tons of free cash flow.

So what's the problem?
At $246 million, Ambassadors Group is just too small for most analysts to bother with.

See, fortunately for us, analysts don't have time to cover every publicly listed stock. They have to pick and choose -- and they usually choose blue-chip companies such as General Electric (NYSE: GE) or recent hot names like DVD supplier Netflix (Nasdaq: NFLX).

They're big, they're popular, and they're lucrative from an analyst's perspective -- because the first two reasons mean lots of people want to read about them. Just look at how many analysts are covering these big boys:

Company

Number of Analysts

Market Cap (in billions)

5-Year Annual Growth Rate

eBay (Nasdaq: EBAY)

22

$30.9

(13%)

Home Depot (NYSE: HD)

21

$45.5

(5.1%)

Pfizer (NYSE: PFE)

16

$118.5

(4.5%)

Yahoo! (Nasdaq: YHOO)

26

$24.8

(12.8%)

Data from Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's.

And when analysts watch a stock, they don't just watch it -- they scrutinize every detail of its quarterly statements, inspect footnotes, and have the luxury of meeting with management to get the inside scoop.

In other words, they know the stock inside and out. And with so many analysts tearing through company news and reports, it's hard to find a large cap that's undervalued in a normal market. And finding a company that's undervalued, well, that's one of the most essential steps to netting great returns over the long run.

While we can't necessarily say that the companies listed above have done terribly over the last five years because of all the analyst coverage, I'll tell you one thing for certain -- in a normal market, it's hard for a company to beat expectations (which usually drives up stock prices) when so many eyes are watching.

Love the stocks they hate
Why compete with analysts on the big guys, when there are hundreds of small caps that no one has discovered? The fewer people evaluating a stock, the better chance you have to find -- and benefit from -- mispricing.

Many of those ignored small caps eventually turn into the big names -- and they can take you with them. Consider Wal-Mart. When it had its initial IPO, and for years afterward, this retail giant went almost completely unnoticed. But it's experienced a compound annual growth rate of more than 20% over the last 30 years. Just think what an early investment, when it was just a small, overlooked vendor from Arkansas, would have gotten you.

Today, Wal-Mart is a $116 billion company. It may still grow, but it no longer enjoys the same kind of room to grow.

Meanwhile, hundreds of small caps just like Wal-Mart used to be -- with plenty of room for growth -- are still being ignored by Wall Street. Never mind that from 1926 to 2006, small-cap stocks beat large-caps by an average of 2.3%.

That may not sound like a lot, but $20,000 invested over 30 years in large caps would have earned 10.4% annually (the S&P average over that time period) -- and you'd have a final investment of $389,136.

If you had invested in small caps, however, that number would be $722,349. Now that's something to get excited about.

Quick, while no one's watching!
Not every small cap should grab your attention. You can find badly run small caps just as often as you can find badly run large caps.

I want to find businesses with clean balance sheets and at least five years of proven track records of returning capital to shareholders. So I look for small-cap companies with the following characteristics:

  1. Five-year revenue and net income growth greater than 10%.
  2. Debt-to-equity ratios less than 40%.
  3. Returns on equity greater than 15%.

Here are a few companies that fit those criteria, in addition to being snubbed by Wall Street:

Company

Number of Analysts

Market Cap (in millions)

5-Year Annual Growth Rate

K-Tron International

0

$276

35.2%

American Dairy

2

$642

50.8%

EZCORP

5

$694

40.5%

Dril-Quip

7

$2,131

35.8%

Data from Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's.

You've probably never heard of half of these companies (I certainly hadn't) -- and that's the point. They're small and little-followed -- so I like my chances against those odds!

There's plenty to be found
The four stocks above have been able to prosper in a very challenging five-year time period -- and there's nothing coincidental about the results. Small caps just have more room to grow, and they give you a better shot at a great price.

At Motley Fool Hidden Gems, these are exactly the types of companies we search for. Instead of following $353 billion ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM), we track companies like Ambassadors Group. With an efficient business model, healthy inside ownership, and an attractive growth market, it's a classic Hidden Gems selection.

Companies like this are perfectly poised to take advantage of minimal market exposure, just like you should take advantage of their growth. If you'd like to learn more about Ambassadors Group, or see all of our Hidden Gems research and recommendations, we're offering a free 30-day trial. Click here for more information.

Already a member of Hidden Gems? Log in at the top of this page.

Fool contributor Jordan DiPietro owns shares of General Electric. Wal-Mart, Home Depot, and Pfizer are Motley Fool Inside Value selections. Netflix and eBay are Stock Advisor picks. Motley Fool Options recommends a bull call spread on eBay. The Fool owns shares of Ambassadors Group. The Fool's disclosure policy loves finding hidden treasuries.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On October 23, 2009, at 4:40 PM, Patricia013 wrote:

    LOL - I just love you analysts with your hocus-pocus numbers. As an 11 year seller on Ebay I've been saying for the past 1 1/2 years that Ebay is being managed foolishly and is on the wrong path. Nobody is listening yet:

    4th quarter 2008 - decline

    1st quarter 2009 - decline

    2nd quarter 2009 - decline

    3rd quarter 2009 - decline!!!!!!!

    Their stock isn't even CLOSE to what it was when Donahoe took over in January 2008 - look it up!

    Every seller I know is complaining about lack of traffic on the site - views of their listings are way way down and sales are very slim. THESE are what COUNT - these are the facts that will make or break that company - they exist on SALES!

    Mr. Donahoe has to go - he has been blaming and kicking around small sellers for the failure of his own business model changes - and his own draconian policies. Sellers have been leaving - buyers are following them and still this insanity trudges on and on! Because of his failure and Amazon's amazing third quarter - Mr. Donahoe has promised us MORE of the SAME. He cannot seem to destroy ebay's core fast enough!

    Mr. Donahoe - please - for the sake of your company admit your failure to "turn around" what never needed to be turned around and please just take your parachute and leave!

  • Report this Comment On October 23, 2009, at 4:56 PM, RobertC314 wrote:

    Patricia, did you just search all MF articles for "Ebay" then copy-paste that into the comments? The article clearly states Ebay: 5-year AGR = (13%). Just to be clear, the parentheses mean negative, which is the same as a decline.

    That is not the number of interest here though, the point is that there are 22 analysts covering Ebay. The point being that it is a big company and a hot name (regardless of current management), and even if you don't think there is a premium priced in because it is a big name, it is certainly not highly undervalued.

    The advantage of looking for stocks with low analyst coverage is they are more likely to be mis-priced. This article gives a good starting place for screening for overlooked small-caps, although it would be nice to see a more detailed analysis of one or two small caps instead of another reminder that "small caps make higher returns than large caps". Investing in small caps is not for everyone, and understanding the risks is just as important as understanding the potential gains.

    -Robert

  • Report this Comment On October 23, 2009, at 5:24 PM, Patricia013 wrote:

    Sorry Robert - when I mentioned declines - I meant declines in core profits. Being an Ebay seller that is where my interest lies and to me that is a yardstick as to how well the company is really doing. I do know that Ebay is in trouble right now. Yes, they have a huge vault of money stashed away but their business model is bad and getting worse.

    Since I retired, I turned in all my stock for a nice safe IRA so I don't dabble anymore but if I did I would not be buying Ebay stock. Its a poorly managed company and I believe after the 4th quarter holiday season this stock will really fall! Things aren't improving there - they are getting worse. I see this from the point of an 11 year seller on the site. Just my opinion but I haven't been wrong about Ebay yet.

  • Report this Comment On October 23, 2009, at 5:53 PM, Tripler76 wrote:

    Just curious - do you think the first line of this article is the reason EPAX stock dropped almost 25% in a day? Did people misunderstand the purpose of this article and sell in a panic thinking it was about to dive, or did some news come out that I'm not aware of?

  • Report this Comment On October 23, 2009, at 6:06 PM, Tripler76 wrote:

    heheh, never mind, just read the annual report released on their website. On the whole, optimistic long term (still debt free, increasing gross margins ), but not great short-term...

  • Report this Comment On October 23, 2009, at 6:56 PM, WEBbuff wrote:

    One of the arguments that this article brings up is very amusing indeed. In the title the author claims that "analysts hate this stock". Yet, the Motley Fool is among the most popular and respected sources of financial information. Thus, it is an inarguable fact that the very analysts who are subjected to the criticism of this article's author read these articles and may listen to its advice. Moreover, the Motley Fool employes scores of analysts who seem to enjoy critizing all the other analysts, except for themselves of course. All in all, I advise the author of this article to be more careful when phrasing his opinions and putting facts in context. He should remember Benjamin Graham's insightful statement in The Intelligent Investor that the investor is part of the public, that he is not immune from the mistakes that to him seem so silly and avoidable.

  • Report this Comment On October 23, 2009, at 8:07 PM, alsinaiyah wrote:

    It seems everyone pushes their own agenda, and while I enjoy reading many Fool articles, I expect more balance in their articles than other crystal ball writers. This article illustrates my point... while no specific recommendation is made to invest in a particular small cap, the point is made that one of these may be the next wal-mart, or other success stories. I would have appreciated the article more if there had been some facts as to the number of small caps that fail, or never make money, or the frequency of small caps failing vs large caps, or any acknowledgment of greater downside.

  • Report this Comment On October 24, 2009, at 1:19 AM, TMFPhillyDot wrote:

    @WEBbuff

    I'm not sure if you misunderstood my article or if I didn't communicate my point properly, but it certainly was not meant to criticize other analysts or pass judgment.

    As stated above by RobertC314, the objective was to illustrate that you, the individual investor, is not confined like a typical wall street analyst is. Because they work for big brokerage houses or investment banks, they don't always have the luxury of looking at small caps or companies that aren't as liquid. And the ultimate take-away is that by examining small cap stocks, you have an immediate advantage because fewer professionals are looking at the same equities.

    I hope that clears up my viewpoint.

    Thanks for the comments.

    Fool on,

    -Jordan(TMFPhillyDot)

  • Report this Comment On October 24, 2009, at 1:22 AM, jodi4j wrote:

    I always did find it interesting that Wal-Mart went unnoticed for so long. I think it traded for pennies on the dollar for almost ten years or so.

    By the way, does anyone know anything about EZCORP or K-Tron International? I'm not familiar with those stocks.

  • Report this Comment On October 24, 2009, at 10:01 PM, bearcatinf wrote:

    We can talk about who "hates" what; however, let's alert each other to the stocks analysts are begining to love: Brocade Communications. Potential explosive grow because of partnering and interest with IBM and HP. Does it get much better than that? Check the action last two weeks and the news coverage.

  • Report this Comment On October 30, 2009, at 4:32 PM, wluebbert wrote:

    With all that free flow cash and no debt, why would this company have such a low dividend? At only 1.8% yield, it doesn't present itself as a stock that someone would buy for dividend income or price growth. $12.06 on 4 Mar 02 and $13.18 on 29 Oct 09. The dividend from .055 in Nov 03 to .06 in Aug 09. What is keeping them from using any of that free flow cash to attract investors? Is the company really that small? I wonder if the thought, built it and they will come play, "make it attractive, and they will invest in it."

  • Report this Comment On October 30, 2009, at 5:22 PM, colleencyn wrote:

    I bought K-Tron in 7/08 and 10/08 and and lost.

    So their growth rate wasn't reflected in their stock.

    Sold today.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1017328, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/2/2009 4:35:59 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Is Everybody Losing It in Finance's Nervous Breakdown?

Related Tickers

12/1/2009 4:00 PM
NFLX $58.23 Down -0.40 -0.68%
Netflix, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
GE $16.17 Up +0.15 +0.94%
General Electric C… CAPS Rating: ****
PFE $18.85 Up +0.68 +3.74%
Pfizer, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
HD $28.00 Up +0.87 +3.19%
The Home Depot, In… CAPS Rating: ***
XOM $76.04 Up +0.97 +1.29%
ExxonMobil Corp CAPS Rating: ****
YHOO $15.13 Up +0.16 +1.07%
Yahoo!, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
EBAY $24.00 Down -0.47 -1.92%
eBay, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Bankruptcy: Bankruptcy is the legal process of eliminating or limiting one's debts by demonstrating inability to pay.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!