Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Mack-Cali Realty Corp (CLI) Q2 2019 Earnings Call Transcript

By Motley Fool Transcribers – Aug 8, 2019 at 10:23PM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

CLI earnings call for the period ending June 30, 2019.

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Mack-Cali Realty Corp (VRE -2.69%)
Q2 2019 Earnings Call
Aug 8, 2019, 8:30 a.m. ET


  • Prepared Remarks
  • Questions and Answers
  • Call Participants

Prepared Remarks:


Good day, everyone, and welcome to the Mack-Cali Realty Corporation Second Quarter 2019 Earnings Conference Call. Today's call is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Michael J. DeMarco, Chief Executive Officer. Please go ahead, sir.

Michael J. DeMarco -- Chief Executive Officer

Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining the Mack-Cali Second Quarter 2019 Earnings Call. This is Mike DeMarco, CEO of Mack-Cali. I am joined today by my partners Marshall Tycher, Chairman of Roseland, our multifamily operation; David Smetana, our CFO; and Nick Hilton, our EVP of Leasing. On a legal note, I must remind everyone that certain information discussed in this call may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities law.

Although we believe the estimates reflected in these statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we cannot give assurance that the anticipated results will be achieved. We refer you to our press release, annual and quarterly reports filed with the SEC for risk factors that could impact the company. We have filed our supplemental this quarter. As always, please contact my partner David with any further suggestions. As we have done before, we're going to break our call down into the following sections:

I will make some opening comments; Nick will discuss our office leasing performance and our view of the markets going forward. Marshall will provide insight into our multifamily operations; David will recap our operating results; and I will close with some comments before we take questions. We had another successful operating quarter as we delivered positive results for the quarter. We had a great deal of transaction activity that we completed on plan regarding sales, financings, our equity raise from Rockpoint and finished the Marriott Hotel at Port Imperial, which opened last month and is doing quite well. I thought our teams continue to perform at the highest level.

This quarter's combined with last quarter's activity in transactions is allowing us to execute our vision. Our office leasing results so far for 2019 were expected regarding total amount of square foot leased and rates achieved. We believe we can achieve equal results over the last -- up over the upcoming quarters, if not increase the amount that we do on the Waterfront. We're also working on a number of new large deals in both the suburbs, which are particularly active at the moment, and on the Waterfront with 2 large transactions.

Additionally, as Marshall will outline, our multifamily operation is really hitting on all cylinders. Regarding the New Jersey office market, as of June 30, the governor in the state of New Jersey did not approve the continuation of the Grow New Jersey incentive. There's a disagreement between the governor and the legislative branches regarding size and scope of the new program. Not whether there should be a program, but just the size and scope. All the branches of the New Jersey government are democratically held. We expect that therefore the disagreement will be resolved in the upcoming weeks.

I expect tour activity to be light until there is certainty around these programs and hopefully pick up in the third and fourth quarter. Regarding our overall office portfolio, we see no pushback in prices, nor do we feel we have the wrong type of space and we continue to make improvements. I still believe we are making a strong 2019 and 2020. Regarding our multifamily portfolio, I'd like to make some brief comments before Marshall makes his. We have been able to push rent to the multifamily business as we continue to invest in our products. Jersey City Hudson County overall is quickly becoming a place for tenants to live in the New York Metropolitan area. We're more than 1,300 units delivered in the last four months in the Waterfront area of Jersey City. Prices increased, and 1,100 of those 1,300 units have all been rented.

The upcoming supply is light for the next several quarters and we monitor each new start. As I've stated before, starting in 2020/2021, the new product that we deliver, both Harborside Plaza 1 and 25 Christopher Columbus, and the planned retail changes in Harborside with the inclusion of Whole Foods and several other restaurants will totally change the way our Jersey operation's looked at. We will be expanding restaurants in all locations in the upcoming quarters. You can expect additional announcements. Also, a second hotel in Port Imperial opened this quarter, which is being very well received in helping to define Port Imperial as a marketplace.

David will go and chat about our planned sales for 2019, which are ahead of schedule. I'd like to mention now we're also in the process of marketing new suburban office portfolio for sale. These efforts are going well. They're preliminary. We expect as they progress to be presented to our board in September a set of alternatives. Pending board approval of these sales, we expect they will be completed in the first quarter 2020. We will update you on these efforts on our next call.

The proceeds from these sales, as David would elaborate, for 2019 will be used to repay outstanding debt. In the cases that we do have a 1031 need, which we expect in 2020, we might mix the multifamily investments. Therefore, leverage will continue to come down.

I would now like to turn the call over to Nick for an overview of leasing.

Nicholas A. Hilton -- Executive Vice President, Leasing

Thank you, Mike. Across our portfolio, we posted another solid quarter in Q2 2019, signing just over 226,000 square feet of transactions, resulting in our core and waterfront portfolios finishing at 79.8% leased at quarter end. Of these transactions, approximately 31%, or 71,000 square feet, were new leases, and 69%, or 155,000 square feet, were in-place renewals. Across all core markets, our rents on Q2 deals rolled up 8.7% on a cash basis and 17.7% on a GAAP basis.

And we committed $5.31 per square foot per year of lease term. As we turn our focus to the specific markets, the Waterfront leasing numbers were light by any measure. However, we have approximately 150,000 square feet of new transactions currently in leases which were not closed by quarter's end. Of the 18,000 square feet that was completed, we continued to see a positive rent push with increases of 10.8% on a cash basis and 16.4% on a GAAP basis. Although there are many factors that can delay the negotiations of a lease agreement, we did see a noticeable slowdown in response timing and even initial inquiries since the sunset of the Grow New Jersey tax incentive program in June of this year.

We believe that the lack of clarity on the cost to occupy office space here in New Jersey has delayed the responsiveness of tenants in the Waterfront office market. As Mike can attest, we're in regular contact with our representatives in Trenton and believe there is motivation to get a new program in place, however, the form of which is still uncertain. To be clear, the tenants that are in leases right now have not had their desire to be in this market derailed, but simply have needed more time to forecast their occupancy cost before signing a multi-million dollar lease obligation.

On a brighter note, our suburban portfolio had a strong second quarter. Specifically, we executed over 195,000 square feet of transactions. One of the most significant included the renewal and 55,000 square foot expansion of Ferraro Foods in Parsippany. Future activity also remains strong as we are in active negotiations with approximately 125,000 square feet of new tenants across our suburban portfolio. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Marshall.

Marshall B. Tycher -- Chairman, Roseland Residential Trust

Thanks, Nick. Roseland's portfolio continues to experience growth in both NAV and cash flow. As detailed on Page 7 in the supplemental, we estimate a residential NAV of $2.2 billion. Roseland's share of this calculation, net of Rockpoint's ownership, is $1.75 billion. Reflecting the continuous improvement of the portfolio, 69% of the NAV is along the Hudson River Waterfront, and 77% of NAV is in operating or in construction assets. Moreover, strategic transactions in the second quarter are aligned with our geographic focus.

In April, the company closed on the acquisition of Soho Lofts for $264 million, a 377-unit community in Jersey City's emerging Soho West neighborhood just south of the Hoboken border. This asset was subsequently encumbered with $160 million mortgage and is currently over 97% leased. In May, the company closed on 107 Morgan. We are finalizing approvals for an approximate 800-unit development in one of Jersey City's prime submarkets. And in June, the company executed an agreement to acquire Liberty Towers, a 648-unit community in Jersey City's Paulus Hook neighborhood. The $409 million acquisition with associated financing is scheduled to close in the late third quarter.

In the second quarter, we completed a series of financings, including a follow-on investment with the Rockpoint Group. The Rockpoint investment allows for up to $200 million in additional equity of which $100 million was funded at closing. Operationally, Roseland's 5,673-unit same-store portfolio experienced a 5.1% increase in NOI over second quarter 2018 on a GAAP basis. NOI growth was spearheaded by revenue growth of 4.4%. This portfolio finished second quarter at 97.6% leased as compared to 96.3% leased last quarter.

The same-store portfolio excludes 1,212 units delivered in 2018. This portfolio is currently 99.8% leased and was delivered at 6.5% yield on cost. It is forecasted to produce stabilized NOI of $26 million. We recently launched a common area and unit renovation program at Marbella and Monaco in Jersey City. The renovations, which have already begun to generate projected rent premiums, will modernize the building's common area amenities and update apartments to current market standards. In July, the company commenced operations of the full-service 208-key Envue, the Marriott Autograph Collection hotel.

The opening of Envue, in addition to its dual-flag counterpart, the 164-key Residence Inn, completes the 370-unit hotel development in the transportation center of Port Imperial. Initial performance of these hotels has been strong, and they're expected to service a cornerstone amenity for the Port Imperial community. Upon stabilization, the mine hotels are projected to generate $14 million in NOI. In addition to our operating lease-up and transaction activities, Roseland's in-construction portfolio is comprised of 1,947 units. These properties are forecasted to generate NOI of approximately $60 million, or yield on cost slightly in excess of 6%. The company's remaining capital commitment in this portfolio is $97 million.

The construction portfolio is highlighted by Riverwalk C and RiverHouse 9, 2 developments containing 660 units in Port Imperial where our last delivery of RiverHouse 11 stabilized in three months and is currently 100% leased, and 25 Christopher Columbus, a 750-unit signature development in Jersey City now called The Charlotte. Project will include construction of a 36,000 square foot onsite elementary school, which will be a significant amenity in the Jersey City Waterfront neighborhood.

The project level long term below market tax abatement fixed for 20 years at 7%. Looking forward, Roseland's preparing for a series of construction starts in Port Imperial and Jersey City in 2020. We are also evaluating the sale of a number of non-strategic apartment buildings and suburban land sites. With that, I'll now turn the call over to David.

David J. Smetana -- Chief Financial Officer

Thanks, Marshall. I have a few brief highlights before turning the call back over to Mike. The quarter largely fell in line with our expectations on the office side with slightly better operational performance in our multifamily division. We reported core FFO per share for the quarter of $0.40 versus $0.50 in the prior year. The year-over-year decrease is due mainly to move-outs of tenants on the waterfront and lost NOI from asset sales executed as part of our disposition program. Cash same-store NOI in our office portfolio declined by 7.3%, and GAAP same-store NOI declined by 0.6% in the second quarter.

Year-over-year declines once again are negatively impacted by move-outs in our waterfront portfolio and positively affected by reduced real estate tax expense. We still see GAAP same-store NOI turning positive in the fourth quarter this year as we begin to anniversary quarters that have been fully impacted by the 2018 waterfront move-outs. As mentioned by Marshall, residential same-store NOI improved by 5.1% this quarter with Boston remaining extremely strong, along with our newer properties in Jersey City. As Marshall noted, renovations of lobbies and units are now fully under way at both Monaco and Marbella, and there were 61 units in total offline for renovation at quarter end, all within our same-store pool.

I'll now highlight a couple transactions that took place in the quarter. We disposed of our last office asset in the Paramus market for a $42 million gross sales price, bringing our total dispositions to date, excluding the Flex sale, to $152 million. We currently have approximately $155 million of commercial assets in various stages of marketing, and therefore are increasing the midpoint of our 2019 disposition guidance by $33 million. The remaining sales will be weighted toward the fourth quarter of this year with proceeds targeted toward debt repayment. Quickly on a couple of acquisitions on the multifamily side.

As previously disclosed, we closed on our Soho Lofts acquisition for $264 million on April 1 and have a full quarter of operations of the asset in our numbers. We also purchased a future residential development lot in Jersey City we call 107 Morgan for $67 million. Both assets are now fully reflected in the Roseland section of our NAV. Turning to the balance sheet, on August 5 we received $150 million in proceeds from a 10-year 3.8% interest-only mortgage we placed on our 111 River office asset in Hoboken, New Jersey. These proceeds were used to retire the $100 million balance remaining on our $350 million 2016 term loan, and we used another $45 million to reduce our 2017 term loan to a balance of $280 million.

This term loan has 2 1-year extensions available on it, pushing the maturity date to January 2022. This loan now represents our nearest term corporate or office debt maturity. The net debt to EBITDA metric was 9.5x this quarter and 9.4x on a trailing six months basis. At the end of the quarter, as Marshall mentioned, we raised $100 million of preferred partnership equity from our Rockpoint Partners to fund our current $1 billion pipeline of development that is currently projected to produce a roughly 6% NOI yield, or $60 million of additional NOI cash flow. The developments in this pipeline begin to stabilize throughout 2020 and 2021.

And as such, we will continue to carry all of the debt related to these projects, estimated currently at $720 million, without any of the attendant EBITDA benefit until these projects are stabilized. Lastly on guidance. As we stated in the press release, we are tightening our core FFO guidance to $1.58 to $1.66 per share. We are still waiting for the state to release our Urby tax credit, and we'll provide an update on that timing when we receive clarity. Notably, we have increased our disposition guidance for the year by $33 million at the midpoint and have moved up our same-store NOI guidance on the multifamily side by 50 basis points at the midpoint as well. We have reflected the modestly better operating results in our office portfolio, increasing the midpoint of same-store cash NOI by 2% and by 1% at the midpoint on a GAAP basis.

With that, I turn it back over to Mike.

Michael J. DeMarco -- Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, David. In closing, as my colleagues have outlined, we continue to believe that we're set up to have a solid 2019 from an execution point of view with the results showing up in 2020 and beyond. Our focus, as Marshall and Nick and David have outlined, is almost 100% on the Waterfront, which really means growing our multifamily business. For example, we intend to exit our DC joint ventures, the land sites in Philadelphia, land sites in suburban New Jersey to either pay down debt and fund our development.

Additionally, we're in the process of selling a portion of our Boston assets and in the process of possibly purchasing a large New Jersey multifamily to replace that cash flow. We're very excited about our operating portfolio, and we'll continue to grow with excellent new projects. The key is really creating a sense of place on the Waterfront, which I guess we'll outline in comments and questions in a few minutes. I'm confident that the total effect of our coordinated efforts on office retail multifamily will produce excellent returns in the short and long term. With that, I'd like to take some questions. Operator, first question, please.

Questions and Answers:


[Operator Instructions]. And we'll take our first question from Emmanuel Korchman with Citi.

Emmanuel Korchman -- citi

Hey guys, good morning. Mike, you talk about the tax credit or the incentive package weighing on Waterfront leasing, but it sounds like things in the suburbs are actually going OK. So I just wondered, what's different about the companies looking at Waterfront and what other options are they looking at that the incentive package would be so meaningful to them that tours are going to stop there versus the rest of sort of the market or the portfolio?

Michael J. DeMarco -- Chief Executive Officer

Great question, Manny. The New Jersey breaks 2 ways. If you look at where the incentives were actually used, they're primarily used in Camden for the tenants coming out of Philadelphia and in the Hudson County market for tenants coming out of New York. That's like 85%. Occasionally you get someone going to Parsippany maybe in a drug corridor. Teva basically was announced coming out of the Pennsylvania market to come into the Morris County area.

But 85% of the incentives are used either in the areas adjoining New York City including -- by the way, you can do the Alpine/Englewood area that attracted corporate tenants over the years, as I think about my comment, and primarily Camden. So the tenants we're seeing in Central New Jersey, whether it's Metropark in Parsippany and Short Hills, are really tenants that are based in New Jersey that are looking to expand and relocate. And we've been getting more than our fair share of the tours, and we think we have a good chance of getting more than our fair share of deals.

Emmanuel Korchman -- citi

And I guess just on the Waterfront piece of that, are those then new to market tenants? And if they say, hey look, we're not going to deal with this, we're not going to wait for these incentive packages, incentive packages don't come, where do they end up?

Michael J. DeMarco -- Chief Executive Officer

I think the game that people are playing or the way the strategy works is previously they would go, do all the work, apply to New Jersey and get the incentive. Now, Governor Murphy has been basically tough on getting new incentives, and he says I really want to make sure they go to a right type of person coming and you're really going to expand, so on and so forth. So the state's been doing a series of audits, which have been well publicized in the papers. So we're seeing tenant demand from tenants in New Jersey already or guys relocating on the Waterfront to begin with.

So there's a lot of large corporate guys that come up, they've been in the building for 15 years. They don't want to restack in place, but they like the operational base of Jersey City, so they move to another building. So we have a number of those tours. We still have others who we work with, which we've announced previously, which we're finalizing which is a decent size deal. And then we have a bunch of smaller deals, so 5 and 10 and 15 from people who chose regional locations and aren't that incentive base. But the guy who wants to move over 300,000 square feet, the incentives are worth $8,000 per job. And 300,000 square feet, you could have almost 2,000 jobs.

It's a big number. And that number they'll play it, so they'll say we want to know the incentives are there and we want to go in, make sure that we get our incentives. It's a more of a corporate strategy.

Emmanuel Korchman -- citi

All right, got it. And then just quickly switching to dispositions. You mentioned that you're going to use proceeds to pay down debt, but at the same time you might have 1031 issues or challenges. Just if you had to throw out a number right now, how much money do you think you'd have to delever versus reinvesting into different property type or different assets?

Michael DeMarco -- Chief Executive Officer

I apologize. I brought up 2 concepts. I didn't make it clear in my comments, Manny. You have to suffer through me. Everything that we're selling in 2019 that David articulated, the $155 million, we'll use to be solely to pay down debt. What I said then thereafter is we have a series of 2020 deals that we start now to make sure we can get them done in the first quarter. Those deals are in the early stages.

I think based on initial tax estimates and strategies that a substantial portion could be used to pay down debt. However, I also think there's a number of those deals that have attenuating tax basis, because we've owned these assets for 25 years. This is not a unit problem. This is a Mack-Cali corporate problem, which might involve having to do 1031. And I wanted to make it perfectly clear that I would only do multifamily investments and not do suburban office or waterfront office. Does that make it clear?

Emmanuel Korchman -- citi

Yep. Thanks, Mike.

Michael DeMarco -- Chief Executive Officer

My pleasure. Again, have a great day.


Our next question comes from Jason Green with Evercore.

Jason Green

Good morning. Just a question on the suburban portfolio. I know you said you hope to have a proposal for the board in September. Can you give us an update just generally compared to kind of what you guys put in your NAV schedule where pricing is coming in? And then just in terms of structure, what the structure of that deal might be, whether you would continue to own a piece or whether it would be an outright sale.

Michael DeMarco -- Chief Executive Officer

It's a little early to give you a definitive answer on all those questions, but I'm going to try to answer as much as I can as always. So, the sales that we have for 2019 are coming on on track, essentially. We usually go up -- David and I have talked about it recently, we might be 4% high on one, 3% low on another. It kind of balances out to that level. And we've shown over the last -- we've been doing this now for 15, 16 quarters that we generally tend to track what our NAV is.

That being said, if I choose to exit the suburban portfolio on a larger deal, I will pay a tax and I'll pay a toll. Someone's going to say to me, if you want to move all of it at one moment, you're going to have to take your number down. I don't think that number will be more than a dollar of NAV. Maybe less, maybe more. I still don't know yet. But we'll make that determination or board will make its determination if I get to that point in September. So we start -- and you're new to us I know because you just joined Steve's team -- we start six to nine months before we intend to do a transaction. We're very thoughtful about it. So we started marketing this in April.

Now we're in August. We got initial feedback. We got some people looking around to funds. We think we know where we can place the debt. We don't want to own any of it. If we sell it, we think we'll be out of it. We won't own a continuing interest. But we haven't made a determination. I would make the recommendations to the board in our September meeting, and then if they chose to, we would then transact. If we chose to transact, I think we'd get that deal or those set of deals done by the first quarter, early first quarter 2020.

Jason Green

Okay, great. Thank you.

Michael DeMarco -- Chief Executive Officer



Our next question comes from Tom Catherwood with BTIG.

Emmanuel Korchman -- citi

Swinging back to Manny's question. You said that the governor is motivated to kind of come up with a new version of the Grow New Jersey Act. But it seems like his focus, when he's not battling with Trenton, has been more on this venture capital funding program. Mike, you alluded to kind of in coming weeks some resolution to Grow New Jersey. What gives you the confidence that that's on kind of the front burner? And then in addition to that, once there is an agreement, how long does it take for that plan to actually go into action? Could it actually be six months or 12 months out?

Michael DeMarco -- Chief Executive Officer

No, I think it'd be much shorter than that, Tom. So let's look at the political landscape. New Jersey is democratically held across the Assembly and a wide majority the Senate and a substantial majority and the governor is democratic. Murphy has -- Governor Murphy has a view that he wanted to mirror some of the success that Massachusetts did with venture capital. He's always been -- he actually happens to been -- I think he's a Bostonian by birth and a New Jersey by transplant.

So he looked at kind of the biotech/tech part of it and thought that was the way to go. The former program actually awarded all jobs, depending just on salary. He wanted to be more focused upon what he thought was growth. Senator Sweeney who runs the Senate President I think has the votes to override the governor if he chose to. So what they did starting last week was had a series of senate conferences and meetings where they interview various people in the business community, presentations have been made. And my understanding is they'll meet again in September when they come back from their recess. The governor in the state had a number of line item vetoes.

They'll go back and see whether they can override those. I think that the governor said he wanted a program, Sweeney's wanted a program. Sweeney wants the program to be similar to the one that expired. The governor wants it to basically be a basket of allocations each year. It's just a debate between the two of them. I think both of them agreed it won't be called intercompany -- interstate transfers like going from Parsippany to Paramus. Everyone knows that jobs are the way they go and jobs are created by basically incentives. Murphy stated it.

I've had conversations with the EDA chairman, the head of the chief of staff. I just firmly believe the state is business oriented. But this is just a disagreement between 3 democratically held legislative branches. So I think they can reconcile between them.

Thomas Catherwood -- BTIG -- Analyst

Got it. And then just --

Michael DeMarco -- Chief Executive Officer

Go ahead.

Thomas Catherwood -- BTIG -- Analyst

I was just going to say, so process-wise, let's assume that 6 weeks, 8 weeks, whatever it is, they were to come to agreement, what's then the legislative kind of structure of actually getting the plan in place?

Michael DeMarco -- Chief Executive Officer

They passed a bill. They passed a bill. And that bill gets enacted into law and then the law gets administrated by the governor. No different than whether they basically elected to whether or not to have medical marijuana, change the voting ages, whatever they want they can do legislatively gets enacted immediately upon the enactment of the bill. Remember, this is a -- there is an agency already set up.

There's a process already set up. The EDA is formed in the state of New Jersey. All they have to do is go back and say, OK, the new rules are you take out page 2, put in page 6 and we're deleting the rest half of the book. But no, I think it's going to go relatively quickly. And then it gets a little bit of a political dance between the governor. June 30, he struck a number of line items. Some of them were political. I think they'll get put back in and then he'll deal with it accordingly.

Thomas Catherwood -- BTIG -- Analyst

Understood. Understood. Then Mike, you've had kind of 8 weeks with your new board members. How have you been engaging with these new members, and how can you -- and can you provide an update on the status of the strategic review?

Michael DeMarco -- Chief Executive Officer

Yes, so it wasn't 8 weeks. It's been basically, I guess it's July. Maybe I guess that's true. Maybe it is 8 weeks. Time flies when you're having fun. The board met. My new members were on the audit committee, so they were fully immersed in these results. We had a very long session, thoughtful. I enjoyed working with each one of them. I think it's a good board. From the tone and texture, no disharmony whatsoever. The strategic review committee, I will not be commenting on it at all substantial, other than the fact that it's formed. It is as formed as was described.

It contains Bernikow as chairman, Lisa Myers, a new director but started with us several months ago, MaryAnne Gilmartin and Frederic Cumenal. And they will start getting information based on all the things we've done. I think it's a little bit of a learning process, so it'll take a few weeks to get up to speed, and then we can start digging into thoughts about which direction we should go. But we already, as you know, continue to move on. Tom, as you'll get the idea of embracing selling the suburban business, it's just another continuation of our strategy to make ourselves more streamlined.

Thomas Catherwood -- BTIG -- Analyst

Understood. And then kind of last one for me. Multifamily demand, it appears strong across the Waterfront still. But there's a number of large

Michael DeMarco -- Chief Executive Officer


Thomas Catherwood -- BTIG -- Analyst

Which is great. Which is great. But there are a number of larger projects in various stages of development, namely Brookfield's Hudson Exchange and Avalon's potential tower at Avalon Cove. How does this competitive set or potential competitive set inform your development plans? And is there thought of accelerating development starts like Urby or Plaza 8 to finish ahead of these other projects?

Michael DeMarco -- Chief Executive Officer

No. I think, Tom, though, and you're a resident of the town for everyone on the call. You know as well as anyone, every time we open up a new project, you get an influx of new citizens. Those citizens have a need for certain services and demand, and things start to pop up where they didn't exist before. There's been a proliferation of gyms in this area. There's been a proliferation of new restaurants. So as you know, I mentioned there were 1,300 units that was the enclave in my list, 90 Columbus and 235 Grand, which is the old Boys and Girls Club site.

All of them are great projects, 2 of them built by -- 1 of them built by Carey and Ines; the other one built by Ines State some colleagues of mine. The last one built by Larry Panterra, et al . All quality projects, all rented up very well and absorption has been better than any other market in the country. The next set of projects will go along Marin Boulevard, whether it's Carey's projects, Silverman, Marco and Albanese . And then Lennar has another site all right in a row. But what's more important to us is, as we've talked about for the people listening on the call, if you look at a map, we're adding a Whole Foods, as you know Tom.

We're also adding a school. Elanar's building has a theater going in, a theater group, a black box theater where I'm the finance chairman. We just got some funding from the city council. That's going to get done. I met with Tollthis week. Toll just built their new condo project. They're about to do another condo building, which will be good for the area. But they're required to open up a 500-seat theater. We intend to put a theater similar to the Angelika, and in fact, we're doing -- and add another school. This is all within 3 or 4 blocks of my office. So, adding the projects I announced. And then lastly but not least, AvalonBay, in my humble opinion, is one of the finest managed multifamily companies in the United States, without question. right. Then Equity Residential but, but Avalon's particularly good on development. That's how they made their mark. That's what they live and breathe. They have planned, but it's not yet announced and I won't steal their thunder, they're doing another project in Jersey City and leave it aloneThat to me is a testament to the market, I think it's of that. I look at it, each time a new deal comes on, it adds more people. More people gives us more services, more restaurants and fills in -- the rest of them are parking lots that we have in this area.

Thomas Catherwood -- BTIG -- Analyst

Got it. Thanks, Mike.

Michael J. DeMarco -- Chief Executive Officer

Thank you so much. Operator, is that it?


We have no further questions at this time. I'd like to turn the conference back to Mr. DeMarco for any additional or closing remarks.

Michael J. DeMarco -- Chief Executive Officer

We thank everyone who joined us from the Hamptons and the Jersey Shore, Martha's Vineyard, Bar Harbor, where else -- whatever other places you are. We appreciate your time and attention. Have a great day. Bye bye.


[Operator Closing Remarks]

Duration: 31 minutes

Call participants:

Michael J. DeMarco -- Chief Executive Officer

Nicholas A. Hilton -- Executive Vice President, Leasing

Marshall B. Tycher -- Chairman, Roseland Residential Trust

David J. Smetana -- Chief Financial Officer

Michael DeMarco -- Chief Executive Officer

Emmanuel Korchman -- citi

Jason Green

Thomas Catherwood -- BTIG -- Analyst

More CLI analysis

All earnings call transcripts

AlphaStreet Logo

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

Motley Fool Transcribers has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Veris Residential, Inc. Stock Quote
Veris Residential, Inc.
$10.84 (-2.69%) $0.30

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
S&P 500 Returns

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 10/06/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.