Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

How Biogen Made an Enemy of 1 of the Biggest Supporters of Its Alzheimer's Disease Drug

By Keith Speights and Brian Orelli, PhD - Jun 30, 2021 at 6:04AM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

A nonprofit group doesn't like a recent move by Biogen.

Many in the scientific community weren't thrilled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Biogen's (BIIB 0.63%) Aduhelm in treating Alzheimer's disease. They didn't think the data supported approval. However, there were some organizations that strongly supported FDA approval of the drug.

Now, Biogen has made a move that's angered one top advocate for FDA approval of Aduhelm. In this Motley Fool Live video recorded on June 16, Motley Fool contributors Keith Speights and Brian Orelli talk about what Biogen did to make an enemy of one of its strongest supporters.

Keith Speights: Okay. Brian, I'm going to switch gears to, this is Brian's favorite company we're going to talk about right now. [laughs] Biogen. Brian was in a bad mood last week after Biogen won FDA approval of its Alzheimer's disease drug. There were all kinds of reasons why, but OK.

Brian, so here's the story that I noticed this week. The nonprofit Alzheimer's Association was a big supporter of FDA approval for Biogen's Alzheimer's disease drug, Aduhelm. Now that the FDA has approved the drug though, Biogen appears to have made an enemy out of this top supporter.

What happened in this situation? How does this potentially impact Biogen going forward?

Brian Orelli: Yeah. The association is upset about the $56,000-per-year price tag. I'm on the record saying I don't think the drug should have been improved, but I'm more upset with the FDA than I am with Biogen.

Biogen's a company, they want to make money, so I don't have a problem with them submitting the application. I have more problems with the FDA giving it accelerated approval when I don't think that was the right thing to do. I think they should have made Biogen go back and run a third study to improve their hypothesis. But I'm also fully supportive of the $56,000 price tag. To me that says that Biogen and its partner, Eisai, don't think that this is going to be a drug for the masses.

The association is in a tight spot, because they are an advocate for the masses and so they would like as low a price as possible. But I imagine there's some scientists at the association that might agree with me that they shouldn't have the approval and so maybe I'm not sure how much the association should be recommending the drugs. I think this might be more making sure that the next drug actually works. They may be setting Biogen up so that the next company that gets a drug approved doesn't come right behind Biogen and expect a $50,000 price tag on it.

I would imagine that most companies probably wouldn't do that. If you look at, let's say Lipitor or something like that, those weren't $50,000, and Pfizer didn't have to charge $50,000 a year for Lipitor because they could sell it to the masses. I think that if a drug that works and will get large-scale recommendations from doctors, prescriptions from doctors, then I think the companies will probably wouldn't price it that high.

Assuming I'm right then Biogen thinks this is a specialty drug, I don't think a lack of endorsement for the masses is that big of a deal. I should also note that Biogen can price the drug lower at some point in the future if they get additional sales and that justifies use for the masses.

Speights: Do you think that the Alzheimer's Association is maybe most concerned about the potential out-of-pocket cost, the co-pays that Medicare patients, in particular, might have to pay for this drug?

Orelli: Yeah, that's a big problem here because it's an infused drug, so instead of growing under Medicare Part D, D as in drug, it goes under Medicare Part B, and so then that has a much higher co-pay than the Medicare Part D does, and so I think that that's probably a big problem, although there's not much that Biogen can do about that because since used, it's got to be that way.

Brian Orelli, PhD has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Keith Speights owns shares of Pfizer. The Motley Fool recommends Biogen. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Biogen Inc. Stock Quote
Biogen Inc.
$222.38 (0.63%) $1.39
Pfizer Inc. Stock Quote
Pfizer Inc.
$49.75 (-0.72%) $0.36
Eisai Co., Ltd. Stock Quote
Eisai Co., Ltd.
$46.56 (1.17%) $0.54

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
S&P 500 Returns

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 08/15/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.