Stop me if you've heard this one before: How many pharmas does it take to accelerate the development of drugs?
Ten!
Ha-ha! Get it? Ten.
As they say, the funniest jokes are the ones that are true. I kid you not, there really are 10 companies that think they can band together to speed things up.
Separated, the companies are inefficient at running clinical trials. But together, Abbott Labs
I'll believe it when I see it.
The companies have formed a non-profit called TransCelerate BioPharma, which plans to tackle inefficiencies in the clinical trials as its first task. Right now, each company has to reinvent the wheel each time they run a trial. If everything was standardized, it would be a lot easier on clinical trial investigators, the doctors actually running the trials.
That certainly sounds like a good idea, but putting it into practice doesn't sound nearly as easy. Can 10 competitors really be expected to share resources to create a better system that will ultimately help those competitors?
As an example, one of the initiatives is to set up a system so companies can procure other company's drugs to use as comparators in clinical trials. That's great if you're on the receiving end, but not so much if it means helping a competitor get onto the market. Celgene
Call me skeptical, but I have a feeling every company in the consortium is probably more interested in benefiting from the intuitive than they are in helping their fellow companies bring drugs to the market quicker.
Here's another contrarian view: Of the six largest banks, only one stands out for eschewing risk and sticking as close to the traditional banking model as a trillion-dollar bank can. Find out which bank and why Fool analysts think it will trounce its competitors in the Fool's new free report. Click here now to claim a copy.
