Former Chesapeake Energy (NYSE:CHK) CEO Aubrey McClendon once boasted that the Utica Shale would prove to be "the biggest thing economically to hit Ohio, since maybe the plow." He called it a half-trillion dollar opportunity because "it sounds bigger" than a $500 billion opportunity. Unfortunately for McClendon, the Utica Shale didn't work out exactly how he envisioned it would. Many of his peers pulled back on the play after it turned out to be less oily than expected.
McClendon, however, never backed down. It's a good thing too because his former employer, Chesapeake Energy, is now certain that he was right and that the Utica Shale is a world-class energy asset. He likewise remains certain that the Utica's best days lie ahead as he's making a multibillion-dollar bet on the play through his new company, American Energy Partners.
McClendon's big bets
So far, McClendon has raised a whopping $8.7 billion to drill U.S. shale plays after recently raising another $4 billion. A third of these funds are earmarked toward the Utica Shale as McClendon also has his sights set on the Marcellus Shale and Permian Basin, where he is forming two new companies to target those plays.
What's interesting, given McClendon's history, is he actually has a lot of money to pursue his grand plan. What he doesn't have right now is the people nor the deals. In fact, he recently told a Houston energy conference that "I need deals and I need people" and one of the reasons he was presenting was because he was there on a recruiting mission.
That being said, this is a man who has already completed three Utica Shale deals this year. He spent $924 million to buy the 74,000 Utica Shale acres that Hess (NYSE:HES) sold earlier this year. On top of that, he completed a deal with ExxonMobil's (NYSE:XOM) XTO Energy unit to fund 100% of the near-term drilling costs of 55,000 net acres in a "core area" of the Utica Shale. In return, McClendon's company will receive ownership of 30,000 net acres from ExxonMobil in the Utica Shale. A third deal brought the company's total haul in the Utica Shale up to 130,000 net acres, which doubled its holdings in the region.
Just getting started
Despite all of this wheeling and dealing, McClendon is hungry for more. This is despite the fact that some of the acreage he is buying didn't hold compelling economics for the seller. Hess, for example, noted that the acreage it sold was primarily dry gas. The company concluded that the potential returns from the investment at both current and projected natural gas prices didn't justify retaining and drilling the acreage. That, however, doesn't mean it won't be economically appealing for McClendon's company to drill.
One thing that his former employer, Chesapeake Energy, is finding is that the dry gas potential of the Utica Shale is proving to be more lucrative than investors realize. The company and many of its peers are drilling impressive wells as seen on the following slide:
As the slide notes, these wells have the potential to produce more than 10 billion cubic feet of natural gas equivalent during the lifespan of the well. To put that into perspective, the gas produced during the lifetime of one well is enough gas to supply all of the energy needs for 100,000 American homes for one year.
With the right cost structure, these wells can be highly profitable. It's a cost structure that Chesapeake Energy has, which is why it sees so much value in the more than 2,000 future well locations it possesses. It's this same value that McClendon sees in the Utica whether it's in the dry gas portion or the currently more lucrative liquids-rich section of the play.
The Utica Shale is starting to become the economic powerhouse that McClendon envisioned. While it won't fuel returns for everyone, which is why Hess is pulling out of the dry gas portion of the play, it is moving the needle for companies like Chesapeake Energy and is likely to do the same for McClendon's new venture. Needless to say, investors shouldn't be writing off the Utica Shale as it still has the potential to fuel returns for the right companies.
Matt DiLallo has no position in any stocks mentioned, and neither does The Motley Fool. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.