Have I got a deal for Topps
Sure, Topps had its reasons to go all Bazooka Joe on the higher offer. It came from Upper Deck, a fierce rival that would have every reason to reshuffle the upper brass at Topps. The financing was a little suspect, too. The $9.75 bid that was ultimately accepted by shareholders this week came from Tornante, an investment group led by former Disney
"Topps' management team and employees are the best in the business," Eisner said at the time of the deal. "We look forward to working with all of them to grow the company in new and exciting ways."
All of them?
Self-interest at work
Oh, the lower offer meant that the fat cats at Topps were saving their own hide. It's selfish. It certainly is cheating shareholders out of an extra buck by not being more receptive to higher offers. Because they were slinging mud -- or is it those rock-hard sticks of gum that trading cards used to come with -- at Upper Deck from the get-go, it's no surprise that higher offers didn't pour in.
Given time, Topps could have cut a better deal for the sum of its parts. It could have sold its candy business to Tootsie Roll
But it never happened. A company so bent on cashing out while still staying in went for a bad deal. So I'm going to crease the Mendoza card by bending it in half -- yes, a Mendoza Line -- and Topps will still take it.
Longtime Fool contributor Rick Munarriz hasn't bought trading cards in ages, though he still keeps his old cards around. He is also part of the Rule Breakers newsletter research team, seeking out tomorrow's ultimate growth stocks a day early. He does not own shares in any of the companies in this story, save for Disney. Wrigley is an Income Investor recommendation. The Fool has a disclosure policy.