Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

3 Ways Trump Has Proposed Cutting Social Security

By Sean Williams – Oct 9, 2020 at 6:06AM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

These direct and indirect proposals would reduce Social Security's spending.

Social Security, our nation's most prized social program, is responsible for providing benefits to over 46 million retired workers each month and is singlehandedly pulling more than 15 million of those retirees out of poverty. It's also a program that's in some pretty big trouble.

Since 1985, the annually released Social Security Board of Trustees report has cautioned that the program's long-term (75-year) outlays wouldn't cover projected revenue collection. As of 2020, Social Security's unfunded obligations through 2094 had ballooned to a whopping $16.8 trillion. Without intervention from Capitol Hill, retired workers could face sweeping benefit cuts of up to 24%, beginning in 2035.

There's no question Social Security needs some help, and that's expected to start at the top, with President Trump. For the most part, Trump has maintained a hands-off approach with Social Security, choosing instead to indirectly influence the program by attempting to boost payroll tax collection via lower corporate and individual tax rates. But make no mistake about it -- even though Trump has largely avoided calling for direct policy changes to Social Security, he's previously suggested cutting benefits three separate ways.

President Trump speaking with reporters.

President Trump speaking with White House reporters. Image source: Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead.

Eliminating waste in the SSDI program

To begin with, each of President Trump's federal budget proposals while in office have called for an overhaul of the Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) program, which was providing benefits to nearly 9.8 million people, as of August 2020. This overhaul focused on eliminating wasteful spending within SSDI, as well as reducing retroactive benefits paid to eventually approved beneficiaries from a period of 12 months to six months.

Since presidential budget proposals estimate the economic impact of fiscal policy actions for a period of 10 years, Trump's federal budgets were expected to reduce SSDI outlays by the following amounts over the subsequent decade (a federal fiscal year runs Oct. 1 through Sept. 30):

There are two things worth noting here. First, these figures are a drop in the bucket relative to what Social Security is expected to outlay over the next decade. According to estimates, Social Security is estimated to expend more than $15 trillion, in aggregate, over the next 10 years. This means a $24 billion to $72 billion outlay reduction to resolve perceived inefficiencies in the SSDI program represents a mere fraction of total outlays.

Second, presidential budget proposals have historically represented nothing more than a starting point for more thorough budget discussions in Congress. This is to say that none of Trump's four proposals were ever given much credence as concrete spending plans.

A senior businessman counting cash in his hands.

Image source: Getty Images.

A call for means testing

Another pathway to Social Security benefit cuts, loosely proposed by President Trump while on the campaign trail four years ago, is means testing, which would partially or fully phase-out benefits for individuals who earn more than preset income thresholds. In other words, it would keep well-to-do seniors from receiving a full benefit or perhaps any benefit at all, if they aren't reliant on their Social Security income to make ends meet.

Trump has previously suggested that he wouldn't take a Social Security benefit and that other wealthy individuals should follow suit. However, without seeing Trump's tax returns, it's unknown whether or not the president is currently receiving a monthly payout from the program.

Additionally, it's worth pointing out that President Trump has never made means testing for Social Security benefits an official proposal. It was merely a discussion point tossed out by Trump prior to his 2016 election as a way to reduce Social Security's long-term outlays.

Interestingly, means testing might be one of the few Social Security changes America's politically divided Congress could agree on. Although Democrats are generally against the idea of any policy changes that would result in Social Security benefit cuts, reducing outlays to the highest-earning seniors might be something they'd consider. To add, means testing is something that Democratic Party presidential nominee and current polling front-runner Joe Biden has tossed around as a Social Security solution in the past.

Two Social Security cards lying atop a W2 tax form, highlighting payroll tax paid.

Image source: Getty Images.

A partial or permanent elimination of the payroll tax

The third and most recent example of President Trump's call for Social Security benefit cuts involves his pursuit of a partial or permanent cut to the payroll tax. The 12.4% payroll tax on earned income (wages and salary, but not investment income) was responsible for $944.5 billion of the $1.06 trillion that Social Security collected in 2019.

In an effort to combat the economic struggles tied to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, Trump signed an executive order in mid-August that deferred payroll tax collection between Sept. 1 and Dec. 31. This deferral was designed to beef up workers' paychecks for the remainder of 2020 but have those same workers repay what was deferred in 2021. Some states and businesses have chosen to opt out of the voluntary deferral program. 

President Trump has also tossed around the idea of permanently eliminating the payroll tax, if reelected. This would allow workers to receive beefier paychecks but would remove the most critical source of Social Security's funding. It should be pointed out that while Trump has mentioned the idea of eliminating the payroll tax on more than one occasion, no one else in his administration has taken the idea seriously, as it would leave a gaping hole in the Social Security program. Neither Democrats nor Republicans would be in favor of eliminating the payroll tax.

The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
326%
 
S&P 500 Returns
102%

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 10/03/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.