Blurring the lines
Technically, Johnson & Johnson and Pfizer could also be viewed as biotech companies. Both big drugmakers develop biologics made from living organisms.
For example, J&J’s Stelara is a monoclonal antibody. So is Darzalex. Some of Pfizer’s top products are biologics, including Comirnaty and Prevnar.
There has been an increasing blurring of the lines between biotech and pharma. Many traditional big pharma companies now develop biologics. Some drugmakers refer to themselves as “biopharmaceutical companies” to reflect their focus on both biologics and traditional pharmaceuticals.
To confuse matters further, some companies that develop drugs not derived from living organisms are commonly referred to as biotechs. As a case in point, the State Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI +0.03%), as its name suggests, owns biotech stocks. Vertex Pharmaceuticals (VRTX +1.10%) is one of the exchange-traded fund's holdings. But neither Vertex’s best-selling cystic fibrosis (CF) drug, Trikafta, nor the company's other CF drugs are biologics.
It has become widely accepted to categorize all small drugmakers as biotech companies, even when they don’t meet the definition of a biotech. Madrigal Pharmaceuticals (MDGL +3.87%), which has a relatively small market cap and "pharmaceuticals" in its name, is a holding of the State Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF. However, Madrigal's only approved product, metabolic-associated steatohepatitis drug Rezdiffra, isn't a biologic.
Biotech vs. pharma: What's the difference?
How can you differentiate between a biotech company and a pharmaceutical company? The following table provides a quick way to determine which category a drugmaker belongs to: