iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV +0.17%) provides low-cost exposure to defensive sectors such as energy and staples, while Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV +0.52%) pairs high yield with significant technology growth exposure.
Investors seeking income-oriented strategies often find themselves choosing between defensive stability and sector-driven growth. While both funds target high-yielding U.S. stocks, they produce very different portfolios based on their underlying methodologies. Both funds offer distinct ways to generate cash flow from a portfolio of established American companies. Choosing between them requires deciding whether to lean into the safety of value-oriented stalwarts or the momentum of the tech sector.
HDV & FDVV: Performance Comparison
Key Financial Metrics
Snapshot (cost & size)
| Metric | HDV | FDVV |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | iShares | Fidelity |
| Share price | $28.71 (as of 2026-10-09) | $61.67 (as of 2026-10-09) |
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.15% |
| 1-yr return (as of Oct. 9, 2026) | 22.2% | 14.1% |
| Dividend yield | 2.9% | 2.8% |
| Beta | 0.53 | 0.87 |
| AUM | $14.9 billion | $10.2 billion |
Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from monthly returns over the available fund history (up to five years). The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. Dividend yield is the trailing-12-month distribution yield.
The iShares fund is the more affordable option, with an expense ratio of 0.08% compared to the Fidelity fund's 0.15%. The iShares fund manages $14.9 billion in assets under management (AUM), making it larger than the Fidelity fund, which holds $10.2 billion. While both offer competitive yields, the difference remains minimal, with the iShares fund providing a slightly higher trailing payout.
Performance & risk comparison
| Metric | HDV | FDVV |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (5 yr) | (15.4%) | (20.2%) |
| Growth of $1,000 over 5 years (total return) | $1,776 | $1,916 |
What's inside
The Fidelity fund emphasizes sectors such as Technology (32%), Financial Services (18%), and Consumer Cyclical (12%). Its largest positions include Nvidia Corp (NVDA -1.84%) at 7.78%, Apple Inc (AAPL -0.28%) at 7.02%, and Microsoft Corp (MSFT +1.08%) at 5.67%. The fund contains 119 holdings. It was launched in 2016. Fidelity High Dividend ETF has paid $1.71 per share over the trailing 12 months, which, on its recent ~$61.7 share price, works out to a 2.8% yield.
In contrast, the iShares fund prioritizes Consumer Staples at 27%, Energy at 25%, and Healthcare at 13%. Its top holdings include ExxonMobil Corp (XOM -1.32%) at 9.39%, Chevron (CVX -1.23%) at 7.07%, and AbbVie (ABBV +0.59%) at 6.89%. The fund contains 74 holdings. It was launched in 2011. iShares Core High Dividend ETF has paid $0.85 per share over the trailing 12 months, which, on its recent ~$28.7 share price, works out to a 2.9% yield.
For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.
Which looks like the better buy
When comparing the iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and the Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV), investors should consider several key factors. Let's see what they tell us about each fund.
First, we should examine each fund's strategy. HDV targets traditional dividend-paying, defensive stocks. Meanwhile, FDVV employs a hybrid strategy, hunting for not only companies with current yields but also those likely to grow their dividends. As such, HDV has a lower risk profile, whereas FDVV has a relatively higher one.
Two other important factors are historical performance and income potential. Since 2021, FDVV has generated a total return of 89%, equating to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13.5%. HDV, by contrast, has delivered an 83% total return, with a 12.8% CAGR. As for income, HDV has a slight edge. It boasts a dividend yield of 2.9%, while FDVV's dividend yield is 2.8%.
One final factor to weigh is cost. Each fund has an affordable expense ratio. FDVV's expense ratio is 0.15%, whereas HDV's is only 0.08%. For context, a person who were to invest $10,000 in each fund would expect to pay $15 in annual fees for their FDVV shares and only $8 in annual fees for their HDV shares.
In summary, HDV and FDVV are both chock-full of dividend stocks, however, their overall strategy, costs, performance, and yields vary. HDV is the choice for those seeking traditional, conservative, low-volatility, dividend-based investments. FDVV, on the other hand, may appeal to investors seeking a more nuanced approach that incorporates some growth factors into its allocation mix.
