Bears have overrun Ancestry.com's
Shares of the leading genealogy website operator were down by roughly 20% this morning after the company posted financial results that inherited trouble spots in key metrics and ended with a soft outlook for the current quarter.
The fourth quarter itself wasn't too shabby on the income statement. Revenue climbed 26% to $104.2 million, fueled by a 22% increase in subscribers and a healthy year-over-year increase in average revenue per user. Ancestry.com's profit of $0.40 a share was ahead of both the $0.25 a share it earned a year ago and the $0.34 a share that analysts were expecting.
So far, so good -- but now let's introduce the rest of the brood.
The black sheep of the family
Subscriber acquisition costs clocked in at a problematic $107.88 for every gross subscriber added to its rolls. That ransom was just $93.64 three months earlier and $96.87 a year before.
Paying more for new customers would be worthwhile if they were paying more, but -- alas -- they're not.
Average monthly revenue per subscriber may have climbed to $18.38 from $17.78 a year earlier, but it was a dip for the third quarter's $18.68 showing.
There's a reason for that. The premium website operator tweaked its pricing late last summer. Ancestry.com decided to bump its monthly rates higher, but at the same time providing better discounts on longer-term subscriptions. In other words, it's trying to make it more cost-effective for new visitors to sign up for longer membership plans.
This should improve churn, and it did. Ancestry.com's monthly churn of 3.8% is refreshingly lower than the prior year's 3.9% and the two preceding quarters at 4.6% and 4.2%.
This is the silver lining behind the lower revenue average per subscriber, but they better stick around longer given the growing marketing costs to woo them over in the first place.
As the world churns
Subscriber turnover can be a tricky beast. Netflix
Other popular subscription services including TiVo
Ancestry.com's near-term prospects aren't as bad as today's stock dive suggests.
Who Do You Think You Are? -- the primetime genealogy series that Ancestry.com and Comcast's
The market's still skeptical. Ancestry.com is eyeing just $106 million to $108 million in revenue this quarter, representing a meager sequential uptick over the holiday quarter's $104.2 million but also shy of the $108.9 million that Wall Street was targeting.
Ancestry.com's guidance for all of 2012 -- calling for revenue to grow by 14% to 18% with adjusted EBITDA climbing even better -- is more in line with what the market's expecting, but investors will always take the near-certainty of a current quarter's projections over the foggy nature of a full-year glimpse.
The market may also not be entirely pleased that Ancestry.com is only looking to close out the year with a little more than 1.9 million subscribers. There may be nothing inherently wrong with growing its rolls by 12% to 15% this year, but the service did add more net new subscribers in 2011.
The good news here is that Ancestry.com has never been this cheap. The stock is now fetching just 15 times this year's projected profitability and a mere 12 times next year's bottom-line target. The family portrait may not look pretty now, but the price is certainly right for a service that is continuing to grow in popularity.
Next in line
Ancestry.com has been a disappointment since I recommended it to Rule Breakers newsletter subscribers two years ago, but a few big winners have been more than enough to generate overall market-thumping returns for the growth stock service. Now it's time to discover the next Rule-Breaking multibagger. It's a free report. Want it? Get it.
Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Ancestry.com and Netflix. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Longtime Fool contributor Rick Munarriz calls them as he sees them. He does not own shares in any of the stocks in this story, except for Netflix. Rick is also part of the Rule Breakers newsletter research team, seeking out tomorrow's ultimate growth stocks a day early.