Best markets in the 12 months after a midterm election since 1874
Splitting unified and divided government by party changes the picture.
FAQs
About the Author
Read Next





Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.
Since 1874, the S&P 500 has climbed in the year following 32 of the last 38 midterm elections, gaining an average of 14%, according to a Motley Fool analysis of election-year stock market history.
Neither how many seats the president's party loses in Congress nor which party ends up running Washington afterward has been closely tied to the S&P 500's return in the following year, according to a Motley Fool analysis of Robert Shiller's stock market data set, official U.S. House of Representatives election results, and U.S. Senate Historical Office Party Division records.
The historical record of stock market performance after midterm elections strengthens the case for long-term investing based on company fundamentals. It also suggests that trading on election odds or results, the way gamblers do on prediction markets like Kalshi, isn't a sound strategy.
How the stock market has performed before and after every midterm election since 1874
Midterm-year returns have modestly outpaced the stock market's long-run average return, whether measured against any 12-month period since 1871 or against any November specifically.
Period | Average 12-Month Return | Positive Share of the Time | Sample Size |
|---|---|---|---|
Midterm election years (1874-2022) | 14% | 84% | 38 |
Any 12-month period since 1871 | 11% | 73% | 1,857 |
Any November specifically | 11% | 74% | 154 |
About 150 million Americans own stock, either through a brokerage account or, for most, through a retirement account, according to Motley Fool research. How the market behaves around a midterm election and how investors react to it affect portfolios and retirement funds across the country. It isn’t just a concern for hedge funds and Wall Street traders.
The S&P 500 typically drifts slightly higher before a midterm election. The market has averaged a gain of 4% in the six months before a midterm and 1.5% in the month before Election Day, positive 63% and 76% of the time over those two windows.
Window Before Election | Average Return | Positive Share of the Time |
|---|---|---|
1 month | 1.5% | 76% |
3 months | 2.1% | 68% |
6 months | 4.1% | 63% |
Once the votes are counted, the market cools off, and the following month is more muted than the previous one.
The S&P 500 has averaged a gain of just 0.5% in the month after a midterm, positive only 55% of the time, compared with a 1.5% average and 76% positive rate in the month before.
Bigger gains have historically shown up later: a 6% average gain three months after a midterm and a 10% average increase six months after, positive 76% and 87% of the time over those windows.
Across all 38 midterms since 1874, the S&P 500 has gained an average of 14% in the 12 months after Election Day and finished higher 84% of the time, according to Motley Fool analysis of Robert Shiller's stock market data set.
Year | President | 3-Month Return | 6-Month Return | 12-Month Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1874 | Ulysses S. Grant | 0.9% | 1.3% | 2.6% |
1878 | Rutherford B. Hayes | 8.3% | 16.4% | 49.0% |
1882 | Chester A. Arthur | -0.9% | 2.1% | -0.5% |
1886 | Grover Cleveland | -3.4% | 3.9% | -4.5% |
1890 | Benjamin Harrison | 5.2% | 7.5% | 16.5% |
1894 | Grover Cleveland | -2.3% | 8.8% | 10.6% |
1898 | William McKinley | 19.6% | 18.7% | 25.5% |
1902 | Theodore Roosevelt | 3.1% | -5.8% | -20.1% |
1906 | Theodore Roosevelt | -5.8% | -16.5% | -33.7% |
1910 | William Howard Taft | 2.6% | 4.4% | 2.5% |
1914 | Woodrow Wilson | -2.5% | 6.4% | 29.8% |
1918 | Woodrow Wilson | -0.5% | 15.2% | 21.5% |
1922 | Warren G. Harding | 7.0% | 1.4% | -0.2% |
1926 | Calvin Coolidge | 4.9% | 14.3% | 35.8% |
1930 | Herbert Hoover | 5.0% | -11.2% | -33.3% |
1934 | Franklin D. Roosevelt | -1.2% | 8.6% | 48.1% |
1938 | Franklin D. Roosevelt | -4.2% | -12.2% | 1.4% |
1942 | Franklin D. Roosevelt | 14.5% | 29.0% | 26.1% |
1946 | Harry S. Truman | 8.8% | 0.0% | 9.2% |
1950 | Harry S. Truman | 12.9% | 14.6% | 22.7% |
1954 | Dwight D. Eisenhower | 11.2% | 14.9% | 39.9% |
1958 | Dwight D. Eisenhower | 5.2% | 12.2% | 12.5% |
1962 | John F. Kennedy | 10.7% | 18.7% | 24.9% |
1966 | Lyndon B. Johnson | 8.8% | 16.2% | 18.1% |
1970 | Richard Nixon | 16.2% | 22.5% | 13.6% |
1974 | Gerald Ford | 13.0% | 28.5% | 31.2% |
1978 | Jimmy Carter | 5.1% | 8.1% | 15.3% |
1982 | Ronald Reagan | 7.6% | 21.6% | 25.0% |
1986 | Ronald Reagan | 15.5% | 19.7% | 3.0% |
1990 | George H.W. Bush | 15.9% | 21.9% | 26.5% |
1994 | Bill Clinton | 5.3% | 15.2% | 32.5% |
1998 | Bill Clinton | 9.3% | 17.1% | 23.1% |
2002 | George W. Bush | -7.6% | 3.8% | 17.4% |
2006 | George W. Bush | 4.5% | 9.8% | 7.3% |
2010 | Barack Obama | 10.7% | 12.6% | 4.3% |
2014 | Barack Obama | 2.3% | 4.3% | 3.8% |
2018 | Donald Trump | 1.7% | 5.9% | 16.3% |
2022 | Joe Biden | 4.6% | 6.7% | 15.7% |
Year | President | 12-Month Return |
|---|---|---|
1878 | Rutherford B. Hayes | +49% |
1934 | Franklin D. Roosevelt | +48% |
1954 | Dwight D. Eisenhower | +40% |
The market has risen sharply in the 12 months after a midterm election in a few standout cases, with little to no bearing on the election results themselves.
Year | President | 12-Month Return |
1906 | Theodore Roosevelt | -34% |
1930 | Herbert Hoover | -33% |
1902 | Theodore Roosevelt | -20% |
Similarly, the market has dropped sharply after a handful of midterm elections, again tied more to historical circumstances than to the election outcomes themselves.
Swings like these are a reminder that bull and bear markets show up on their own schedule, midterms or not.
Which party runs Washington afterward and how the branches of government are divided have influenced stock market returns in the 12 months following a midterm election, though not in a straightforward way.
Divided government, where the House, the Senate, or both are controlled by a party other than the president's, has averaged stronger returns than unified government, where one party controls both legislative chambers and the White House.
Configuration | Average 12-Month Return | Positive Share of the Time | Election results |
|---|---|---|---|
Unified government (either party) | 12% | 73% | 15 |
Divided government (either party) | 16% | 91% | 23 |
Configuration | Average 12-Month Return | Positive Share of the Time | Election results |
Unified Democratic government | 23% | 100% | 8 |
Divided government under a Democratic president | 13% | 89% | 9 |
Unified Republican government | -1% | 43% | 7 |
Divided government under a Republican president | 18% | 93% | 14 |
A unified Democratic government has had the strongest average return of the four groups, though it is based on just eight midterm elections, spanning the Wilson to Carter administrations.
Divided government under a Democratic president has resulted from nine midterm elections dating back to the 1880s, and the market has been positive in the 12 months following eight of them.
Divided government under a Republican president followed 14 midterm elections -- the most of the four outcomes -- and the market was positive 93% of the time in the 12 months after those contests.
Unified Republican government is the one arrangement that averaged a negative return in the 12 months after a midterm election. The sample is the smallest, however, and three of the seven years immediately after a midterm election resulting in that arrangement, including 1902, 1906, and 1930, were the lead-up to financial panics that had little to do with which party held Congress.
Stock market returns by the size of the president's party's congressional losses
How many seats the president's party loses in the House or Senate in a midterm election has shown little relationship to market movements afterward.
House Seat Change | Average 12-Month Return | Positive Share of the Time | Sample Size |
|---|---|---|---|
Lost 40 or more seats | 11% | 88% | 16 |
Lost 1 to 39 seats | 16% | 83% | 18 |
Gained seats | 17% | 75% | 4 |
Senate Seat Change | Average 12-Month Return | Positive Share of the Time | Sample Size |
|---|---|---|---|
Lost 5 or more seats | 12% | 88% | 16 |
Lost 1 to 4 seats | 20% | 100% | 8 |
Gained or held seats | 13% | 71% | 14 |
In both chambers, a landslide loss has not been followed by weaker returns than a narrow one in the twelve months after the midterm. The relationship between seat losses and next-year returns is weak in the House, and about as weak in the Senate.
Historically, voters who banked on significant political change to improve their investment returns may have been disappointed.
How should investors think about midterm elections and the stock market?
Since 1874, the S&P 500 has tended to rise in the year after a midterm election more than its average annual return, and that has held up regardless of which party won, how many seats changed hands, or who ended up in charge of Washington afterward.
That should provide comfort to investors. While midterm elections make political headlines and their outcomes can generate angst and uncertainty, the data show they generally do not cause wild market swings once the dust has settled.
Investors deciding what to do with that pattern can look past attention-grabbing political news and feel confident researching stocks to buy and hold for the long run.