The threat of higher taxes has been around for years. But earlier this week, the chances of some major disruptions for some taxpayers got a whole lot bigger, as it became clear that several popular deductions are potential targets for raising revenue in post-election federal budgets.
Republican Presidential candidate Mitt Romney gave some details on his plans for a budget proposal should he be elected in November. Although his calls for lower tax rates across the board run counter to Democratic calls to let current rates rise back to decade-ago levels for upper-income taxpayers, a couple of things he proposed actually suggest at least a little bit of common ground. But they could spell problems for taxpayers who take advantage of the provisions he's proposing to cut -- as well as the businesses that thrive on those provisions.
Say goodbye to mortgage interest deductions?
Romney's call to end the mortgage interest deduction for second homes doesn't go as far as some analysts believe is appropriate, but it's a step toward removing one of the largest subsidies in the tax code. By getting rid of some of the incentives of owning homes, the U.S. might help avoid a future repeat of the housing bubble and the financial devastation that followed.
Housing-related tax provisions abound and are highly favorable to homeowners. Deducting mortgage interest and real estate taxes are just two of the benefits. Joint-filing homeowners can also exclude as much as $500,000 in capital gains when they sell their homes -- avoiding tax entirely on that amount. That's a far better tax break than investors get on stocks, bonds, and other investments.
Of course, getting rid of mortgage interest deductions doesn't do the industries that rely on them any favors. Homebuilders Hovnanian
Killing the deduction on state taxes
The other tax proposal Romney made was to eliminate the deduction for state taxes for high-income taxpayers. That has the potential to be far more divisive, as it hurts taxpayers in high-tax states while leaving untouched those who live in states with low or no taxes.
However, one thing that a lot of people don't realize is that for many, the benefits of state taxes already get eliminated under the current tax code. That's because the alternative minimum tax, which hits millions of taxpayers each year, forces you to reverse itemized deductions on state income and property taxes you pay, making them worthless.
Losing that tax benefit would likely hurt not only individuals who live in those states but also the businesses that rely on hiring skilled workers. Already, no-tax states like Texas and Washington have a huge advantage over high-tax states like California, which partially explains the migration of tech companies toward lower-tax environments over the years. With Apple's
Keep your eyes on your money
In an election year, it's highly unlikely that lawmakers will make much progress even on tax proposals that gain bipartisan support, let alone more contentious issues. But as you consider what moves to make with your finances, be sure to think about how taxes might affect you. If you don't, you could end up making ill-advised decisions that will cost you money.
Taxes are a key part of your overall financial plan, but you also have to have the right investments. Take a close look at The Motley Fool's special report on long-term investing, which includes three stocks to help you reach all your financial goals. Best of all, it's free -- so get your free report today while it's still available.
Tune in every Monday and Wednesday for Dan's columns on retirement, investing, and personal finance. You can follow him on Twitter here.