Image source: The Motley Fool.
Andersons Inc (ANDE -0.23%)
Q4Â 2019 Earnings Call
Feb 13, 2020, 11:00 a.m. ET
Contents:
- Prepared Remarks
- Questions and Answers
- Call Participants
Prepared Remarks:
Operator
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Andersons 2019 Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]
I would now like to hand the conference to your speaker today, John Kraus, Director of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.
John Kraus -- Director of Investor Relations
Thanks, Joe El. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us for the Andersons Fourth Quarter of 2019 Earnings Call. We've provided a slide presentation that will enhance today's discussion. If you're viewing this presentation via our webcast, the slides and commentary will be in sync. This webcast is being recorded, and the recording and the supporting slides will be made available on the Investors page of our website at andersonsinc.com shortly. Certain information discussed today constitutes forward-looking statements, and actual results could differ materially from those presented in the forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including general economic conditions, weather, competitive conditions, conditions in the company's industries, both in the United States and internationally, and additional factors that are described in the company's publicly filed documents including a '34 Act filings and the prospectuses prepared in connection with the company's offerings. Today's call includes financial information which the company's independent auditors have not completely reviewed. Although the company believes that the assumptions upon which the financial information and its forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, it can give no assurance that these assumptions will prove to be accurate.
This presentation and today's prepared remarks contain non-GAAP financial measures. The company believes that adjusted pre-tax income, adjusted pre-tax income attributable to the company, EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA provide additional information to investors and others about its operations, allowing an evaluation of underlying operating performance and better period-to-period comparability. Adjusted pre-tax income, EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA do not and should not be considered as alternatives to net income or income before income taxes, as determined by generally accepted accounting principles. On the call with me today are Pat Bowe, Chief Executive Officer; and Brian Valentine, Chief Financial Officer. After our prepared remarks, Pat, Brian and I will be happy to take your questions. Before Pat makes his opening comments, I want to remind everyone that we will be holding an Investor Day beginning at 8:30 a.m. on Wednesday, April 1. The presentation will also be webcast live on our website. We invite you to listen in.
With that, Pat, the floor is yours.
Patrick E. Bowe -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Thank you, John, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining our call this morning to review our fourth quarter and full year 2019 results. I'll start by providing some high-level thoughts on our overall results and those of each of our four business groups. Brian will then present a brief business review, and I'll finish our prepared remarks with some comments about our current views on 2020. While our adjusted fourth quarter pre-tax earnings fell short of those of the fourth quarter of 2018, we drove our adjusted EBITDA higher by more than 20%. Most of the quarterly earnings shortfall came from the trade group, many of it's nearly many of it's newly acquired product lines performed very well. But the trade group's lower results were caused in large part by a small, late and wet harvest in much of its historical Eastern Corn Belt footprint. The Ethanol Group remained profitable and the Plant Nutrient Group's results were slightly improved. The Rail Group's results were somewhat lower. We sold some assets during the quarter; we sold the Thompson's Ontario agronomy assets, a Michigan Farm Center and a Tennessee Grain Elevator. Most of the proceeds from these sales were used to pay down debt.
For the full year, it's very clear that our lanting trade group acquisition has been and is expected to be a very good one. Play group adjusted pre tax income nearly doubled year over year at the ducted Eva was over 150% higher. For a little while the economic group was consistently profitable. A tough margin environment drove the group's year over year results significantly lower plant nutrient group was impacted by it extremely wet and planting season in its cold geographies that together with an expected decrease in contract manufacturing sales resulted in lower pre tax income than in 2018. Rail income was marginally lower as a slight improvement in leasing income was more than offset by lower income from both car sales and railcar repair business. The Trade Group's number one priority for 2019 was to integrate Lansing into the former Grain Group, and the integration is largely complete.
We achieved our goal to identify and implement at least $10 million in run rate expense savings by the end of 2020. We have exceeded this goal a year early with our total run rate expense savings to date of approximately $11 million. The Ethanol Group's ELEMENT biorefinery came online in the third quarter. While the pace of production ramp-up has been slower than planned, we began producing Ethanol using our new cellulosic technology in the fourth quarter. Also in October, the Ethanol Group merged four separate entities with our partner, Marathon Petroleum Corporation. When the merger was closed, we were able to reduce long-term debt associated with the Ethanol business by nearly $50 million, and the group's financial results are now consolidated. Brian will now walk you through a more detailed review of our financial results.
Brian A. Valentine -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Thanks, Pat, and good morning, everyone. We're now on slide number five. In the fourth quarter of 2019, the company reported net income attributable to the Andersons of $6.6 million or $0.19 per diluted share and adjusted net income of $18.4 million or $0.55 per diluted share on revenues of $1.9 billion. In the fourth quarter of 2018, we reported net income of $23.8 million or $0.84 per diluted share and adjusted net income attributable to the company of $26 million or $0.92 per diluted share on revenues of approximately $800 million. Adjusted EBITDA attributable to the company increased 21% from $63 million in the fourth quarter of 2018 to $76.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2019. For the full year 2019, net income attributable to the Andersons was $18.3 million or $0.55 per diluted share, and adjusted net income attributable to the Andersons was $43 million or $1.30 per diluted share on revenues of $8.2 billion. These numbers compare to 2018 reported net income of $41.5 million or $1.46 per diluted share. And adjusted net income attributable to the company of $46.4 million or $1.63 per diluted share on revenues of $3 billion.
Full year adjusted EBITDA attributable to the company was $246.3 million, which was up 39% over our 2018 adjusted EBITDA of $177.2 million. Our full year 2019 reported effective tax rate was 46.4%, and our adjusted full year tax rate was 16.7%. By comparison, our 2018 effective tax rate was 22.4%. The adjusted 2019 rate accounts for amounts by which we adjusted pre-tax income that are not deductible on our U.S. income tax return. We currently believe that our 2020 effective tax rate will be in the range of 24% to 26%. Total long-term debt increased slightly compared to last quarter, primarily as a result of the consolidation of the ethanol entities. However, as Pat mentioned, we were able to utilize cash previously held at these entities to repay almost $50 million of ethanol debt when the merger closed. Next, we provide bridge graphs that compare 2018 adjusted pre-tax income to 2019 adjusted pre-tax income for both the fourth quarter and the full year. slide six shows that a majority of the year-over-year decrease in income came from the Trade Group, whose adjusted results fell by $5.7 million in the fourth quarter.
The small late and wet harvest in the eastern Corn Belt accounts for much of that shortfall. Moving to a full year results on slide number seven trade group results were up by $18.4 million year over year, primarily due to the strong performance of many of the new business lines acquired from Lansing. ethanol's adjusted pre tax income was down by $13.7 million due to the challenging margin environment for both the quarter and year to date, acquisition related costs were the primary reason that adjusted pre tax income with higher than recorded pre tax income as games from the ethanol merger, and other asset sales, essentially offset the sand and other asset impairment charges. Now we'll move to a review of each of our four business units, beginning with the Trade Group on slide number eight. The Trade Group reported a pre-tax loss of $19 million but recorded adjusted pre-tax income of $18.5 million compared to pre-tax income of $24.2 million in the same period of 2018. Current quarter adjusted pre-tax income excludes $40.4 million in asset impairment charges primarily associated with sand transloading and processing assets acquired as part of the Lansing acquisition.
Solid performance by many of the group's new merchandising lines helped to mitigate the significant reduction in income from Eastern Corn Belt assets as a result of late planting and a small wet harvest. Strong performance by the group's Propane Distribution business helped offset lower operating results from the sand transloading business. Trade Group adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was $38.1 million, an improvement of $7.3 million or 24% over the Grain Group's fourth quarter 2018 EBITDA. For the full year, the Trade Group's adjusted EBITDA improved to $126.3 million, a year-over-year increase of $76.7 million or more than 150%. Moving to slide nine.
The Ethanol Group turned in another solid quarter, considering the difficult market conditions. The group earned adjusted fourth quarter pre-tax income attributable to the company of $7.2 million, up from $6.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2018. Spot margins rebounded early in the fourth quarter, driving increased production in an industry supply later in the quarter. Increased third-party Ethanol trading and hedging helped us during the quarter. However, margins continue to be hurt by elevated corn basis for the three Eastern plants. Production continued to ramp up and new technologies continue to be introduced at the ELEMENT biorefinery during the quarter, though less quickly than originally expected. As mentioned previously, reported pre-tax income of $42.2 million included pre-tax income of $36.3 million from the revaluation of the group's equity interest in entities that previously owned the Albian Climbers and Greenville plants. Those entities, along with the wholly owned Denison facility were merged in early October. One results of the Ethanol merger is a full consolidation of the group's operating results, which improves transparency but will make year-over-year comparisons difficult during 2020.
This change also makes adjusted EBITDA, a more meaningful measure. The group recorded fourth quarter 2019 adjusted EBITDA attributable to the company of $16.6 million. Turning to slide 10. The plant Nutrient Group recorded adjusted pre-tax income of $3.9 million in the fourth quarter, which was similar to fourth quarter 2018 results. Lower operating and interest expenses were mostly offset by a small decrease in gross profit. Margins per ton were much improved for specialty liquid fertilizers but lower for primary nutrients. Volumes were marginally higher for primary nutrients, but lower for specialty liquids and long products. Plant Nutrient adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was $11.5 million, down about $1 million from the fourth quarter of 2018. For the full year, adjusted EBITDA was $42.3 million, which was down 7% from 2018 full year EBITDA of $45.4 million, despite a difficult planting season in our key geographies and an expected drop in contract manufacturing volumes from a record year in 2018. Moving to slide 11. The Rail Group generated $4.5 million of pre-tax income in the fourth quarter compared to $6.7 million last year.
Leasing results reflect lower average lease rates and some credit challenges in the sand and ethanol markets. Utilization averaged 89.4% for the quarter compared to 90.3% last quarter. Total cars controlled remained stable at 24,800 and average cars on lease fell slightly to 22,200 compared to the third quarter. The group recorded $2.4 million of pre-tax income from car sales compared to the $1.2 million of pre-tax income, it earned in the fourth quarter of 2018. Service and other income was not entirely comparable due to a $2.4 million gain on the sale of barges recorded in the fourth quarter of 2018. Repair business results were marginally lower year-over-year. The group maintained 26 repair locations during the quarter. The Rail Group recorded $17.6 million in EBITDA for the quarter, which was comparable to last year's result. For the full year 2019, Rail had EBITDA of $65.7 million, an increase of 13% from $57.9 million in 2018. Before I turn things back over to Pat, we also wanted to spend a little time discussing some of the adjustments we made to reported pre-tax and net income during 2019.
On slide 12, we present a summary of the current quarter and full year adjustments relating to the Lansing acquisition. We incurred $2.8 million of acquisition-related costs in the fourth quarter, bringing the total of those expenses to $17.1 million for the year. As part of finalizing the purchase accounting for the transaction, we trued up income tax expenses relating to our adjustments. The result was a tax benefit of $8 million for the quarter, and $4.4 million for the full year. The impacts of the combined adjustments on earnings per share were $0.33 for the quarter and $0.65 for the year. We estimate that we will incur acquisition-related stock compensation expense of $4.3 million in 2020 and $1.5 million in 2021. The earnings per share impacts of these adjustments based on current shares outstanding are $0.10 and $0.03 per share, respectively. We have not formally adjusted pre-tax income for the impact of incremental depreciation and amortization related to the acquisition. Those expenses were $3 million or $0.07 per diluted share for the fourth quarter and $10.2 million or $0.23 per share for the full year. We expect to record $7.4 million of incremental depreciation and amortization in 2020 and 2021, which reflects the impact of the fourth quarter 2019 sand transloading asset impairment charge.
The EPS impact of those noncash charges is expected to be $0.17 in each of those years. On slide 13, we present a similar summary of the adjustments we made relating to the Ethanol merger, which we closed in October. The most significant adjustment we made was to exclude the $36.3 million noncash gain recorded on the revaluation of our equity investments in the Albian Climbers and Greenville plants. We also incurred $1.3 million in transaction costs during the quarter relating to this merger. The net of those two adjustments was pre-tax income of $35 million, which equates to diluted earnings per share of $0.79. We recorded $2.5 million or $0.06 per diluted share, an incremental depreciation expense in the fourth quarter of 2019. We have not formally adjusted pre-tax income and earnings per share for this amount. Currently, we anticipate recording about $10 million or $0.23 per share in depreciation relating to the asset step-up in each of 2020 and 2021.
And with that, I'd like to turn things back over to Pat for some comments on our outlook.
Patrick E. Bowe -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Thanks, Brian. When we spoke at this time last year, we were optimistic that 2019 results would be better than those of 2018, especially as we continued our Lansing integration work. We saw good early signs from the Trade and Rail Groups, but we were feeling more guarded about the prospects for the Ethanol and Plant Nutrient Groups. We also express confidence about hitting our 2020 run rate EBITDA target of $300 million. Now 12 months later, we're continuing to manage through what has been among the worst Eastern Corn Belt harvest on record. This will negatively impact the earnings of those Trade Group assets well into 2020, but could also provide some good merchandising opportunities. The current margin environment has assuming cautious about ethanol's prospects, especially in the first half of the year.
The continued ramp-up of the ELEMENT plant should result in the industry's lowest carbon score and is anticipated to help improve results late in the year. While the resolution of the China trade war should be a tailwind for both groups, it is unclear when and by how much that resolution will begin to drive demand. While we're on the topic of China, the coronavirus epidemic currently does not have a direct material impact to the Andersons. We think a likely increase in corn planting in 2020 will help the Plant Nutrient Group improve results to a level more in line with recent history. And should be helpful for the three other business groups as well. For the Rail Group, the year-over-year decrease in North American railcar loadings continues to widen, which suggests that both leasing and repair income could trend lower in 2020.
We continue to feel more upbeat about our longer-term company outlook than what we reflected or what is reflected in the market of our current stock price. On our last call, we introduced the following initiatives: one, optimize the Trade Group performance. In 2020, the group will focus on maximizing the Lansing acquisition, growing organically and making opportunistic investments. Two, identify and implement additional Trade Group expense synergies and other expense reductions around the company. We remain confident that we will increase run rate integration and cost savings to $15 million and carve out another $5 million in total company operating expenses by the end of this year. Three, ramp up new products in our ELEMENT biorefinery in commission, technology upgrades at the other four ethanol plants. We now expect that we will be operating the full suite of new technologies at ELEMENT and obtain what we expect to be an industry-leading carbon score sometime late this year. Four, generate positive free cash flow on an annual basis. In addition to producing better operating results, we'll continue to refine our focus on managing working capital.
We also plan to hold maintenance capital spending well below our annual depreciation and amortization expense and Five reduced rates we increase long term debt phone galantine acquisition will focus on reducing debt in 2020. But not as expensive solid growth projects will continue to evaluate our asset portfolio to identify potential sources of cash. In late 2017, we announced the 2020 run rate adjusted EBITDA target of $300 million. Yesterday, we reported 2019 adjusted EBITDA of 240 $6 million, which is nearly 90 million higher than just two years ago. And we're throwing in less than ideal market conditions. We think that with a move toward more normal market conditions, we remain on pace to hit the $300 million run rate even target on time by the end of 2020. In summary, we added significant horsepower to both the Trade Group and the Ethanol Group in 2019. We will continue to tune our business operations and our balance sheet and expect to generate more cash in 2020 and to produce better results.
With that, I'd like to hand the call back over to Joe El, and we'll be happy to entertain your questions.
Questions and Answers:
Operator
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Ben Bienvenu with Stephens Inc. Your line is open.
Ben Bienvenu -- Stephens Inc. -- Analyst
Good morning, then I want to ask a question, the Trade Group continues to deliver better than what would the expected result in light of, as you alluded to, the challenging operating environment in the Eastern Corn Belt. And I wonder if you can help us think about if there's a general rule about when you identify merchandising opportunities through Lansing? How much of an offset relative to the traditional origination business from the Eastern Corn belt? Can we expect Lansing to offset in times of challenges? And then when you're making decisions, balancing those two businesses, can you help us think about $1 of revenue in the origination side of the business or from a volume perspective versus Lansing Trade Group, kind of the margin trade-off that you make, maybe an overly simplified question that's difficult to answer, but any guidance you can help with there would be helpful.
Patrick E. Bowe -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Sure, Ben. I think I know where you're coming from. It is a overly simplified of yet, very complicated question. So what we've done, as you know, the Andersons' footprint of grain assets, our elevators were predominantly Eastern Corn Belt where we had assets in Illinois, Indiana, Ohio and Michigan, and just a couple further west. But Lansing's assets are a little more diversified with elevators in Idaho and Louisiana. But Lansing has really been more of a point-to-point trading business and not so much focused on physical space where the Andersons has had a legacy of physical grain storage and handling and blending and shipping to export ethanol or protein markets. So we had, had a difficult planting season in harvest in the Eastern grain belt, that in some cases our wet harvest was good.
We made some drying margins, but our production was definitely down, hurting what would potentially be normal storage margins in the east as well as carries in wheat have narrowed. So we don't make as much money as we had in recent years on storing wheat, softer wheat in the east. But the good news is that the breadth of the Lansing trading opportunities as broad as from pet food to propane. We have lots of businesses that have performed very well. We take advantage of regional disparities in the grain markets. And in spite of what its has been a relatively sluggish futures market and not in a pretty dim export pace, especially for corn, there has been quite a vibrant domestic demand and opportunities to trade domestically. And that's worked quite well for our trading team, and we continue to see that to be the case in 2020.
Operator
Thank you. Our next question comes from Ken Zaslow with Bank of Montreal. Your line is open.
Ken Zaslow -- Bank of Montreal -- Analyst
Thank you. Good morning, everyone. A couple of questions. One is, can you talk about the ethanol outlook, what is your expectation for China? And separately, your new cellulosic plant, what was the margin structure be relative to the rest of your plant? And I'll stop there.
Patrick E. Bowe -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Sure. A good question, Ken. The whole world that now has been focused on China for some time, and we've all been talking about the trade deal and now that the trade deal has happened, we have a South American harvest that's been very strong. Brazilian real, that's in an all-time low, so just cash markets would favor South American supply to China. So we haven't seen Chinese come to the U.S. market in real strong buying pattern, or that first purchase of ethanol. So the question is about China. When and how big that will be and when will that will happen? And I guess, we don't know that. I think a lot of focus has shifted from the impact of African swine fever, domestic hog production in China now to more coronavirus. What that means for domestic food consumption in China and how those things shift. We'll have to watch that closely. But I think to your question about what that impact to ethanol, I think it won't have an impact to DDGs or ethanol too, we actually see ships hit the water. On the rumor of the trade deal margins went up a little bit, but not seeing that come through with actual orders. It's kind of dissipated to some extent. So the ethanol market in the first half of the year is kind of sluggish from a margin standpoint.
We expect that to pick up later in the year. When you switch focus back to our ELEMENT plant, we were delayed with a really wet construction season, so we're a little bit behind schedule than we originally planned. And we're in the ramp-up phase. The good news is our new technologies that we've introduced there are working well, but I'd say we're still up in the ramp-up phase. And that plant when it's completed and we get certification of the carbon score in California will be a very good position for us. At the time of the project, we talked about a $0.10 to $0.15 premium to California market for sales and the market still looks to be that case, if not a little bit higher than that. So we're still optimistic about what the ultimate marketplace will be for that ELEMENT out, but that hasn't changed. If anything, it's slightly firmer than when we started the project.
Ken Zaslow -- Bank of Montreal -- Analyst
Okay. And then are you surprised by the ramp-up of ethanol production, and I'll leave the ethanol questions at that?
Patrick E. Bowe -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Yes. I think we've seen this for years, right? When we slow down production comes off, and then the market comes out of shutdowns and then it starts to ramp up a little bit. So now we've built stocks as an industry and some production ramp-up has occurred, which keeps a damper on margin structure. So it's somewhat expected because that's been what the past behavior has been. So have to see really how the demand pace continues as we get out of these the winter doldrums and into more of a spring/summer driving season.
Operator
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Eric Larson with Buckingham Research. Your line is now open.
Eric Larson -- Buckingham Research -- Analyst
Yeah, good morning everyone How you doing?
Patrick E. Bowe -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Good morning how about you.
Eric Larson -- Buckingham Research -- Analyst
I'm well thanks so my first question is your grain earnings kind of, actually kind of came in where I thought they would, they were pretty good. Your ethanol margins were better; your Plant Nutrient was quite a bit better. So I guess the first question is, if we're expecting significant increase in corn acres, which I would expect this spring, the setup for 2Q for Plant Nutrient looks pretty good, but you still drag on margins. How do your how do the industry inventories look and volume should be good, but can you get the margin in the second quarter if we get the acreage?
Patrick E. Bowe -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Yes. It's good question, Eric. And we're probably our estimates are for 93 million planted acres, which is probably close to what the industry averages, which will be a nice pickup. And that will be good for overall fertilizer demand. We had a relatively good fall weather that gave farmers and retailers a good opportunity late in the year to get some applications. Our outlook for the spring has kind of returned to normal with a normal planting season. And has some upside with these additional corn acres, as you said, we especially like that. We've had a relatively mild winter across most of the Midwest and so in pretty good shape that way. Be great for some starters to be applied early. And that would be upside potential on margin for us. So fertilizer prices have been relatively stable during this period and there's ample supplies available. So I think we'll have a good solid spring. That's what we're looking forward to.
Eric Larson -- Buckingham Research -- Analyst
Okay. Then a quick question on the Trade Group. You were struggling all year, and I think you did struggle again in the fourth quarter. I think the comps get better. You still struggle against some very high wheat profitability in your grain storage numbers, I believe also in the fourth quarter. Was that a factor in Q4 significantly again, and have we lapped? Well, Q1 start lapsing that those difficult comps for grain?
Patrick E. Bowe -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Yes. I think you got it about right. So as you remember, the last three years, we had outsized storage income on soft wheat and that was a factor also in the fourth quarter. I know if I'll call it struggling. I think it's just been opportunity wasn't here that was here in one year and two or three years ago, where we enjoyed that wheat carry and that, that's where the market works sometimes. We are using that opportunity to move more corn and beans through that space and handle that. So it's like when one market changes, it gives creates an opportunity in another one. So our trade opportunities, especially into the southeast, which has been a strong market here with protein demand is good. So I think we'll have an active Eastern Rail market and some of the other markets where we trade in, and we've done quite well in those spaces.
Operator
Thank you. I'm not showing any further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the call back over to John Kraus for closing remarks.
John Kraus -- Director of Investor Relations
Thanks, Joe El. We want to thank you all for joining us this morning. I also want to mention again that this presentation and slides with additional supporting information are available on the Investors page of our website at andersonsinc.com. Before we sign off, I also want to remind everyone again of our upcoming Investor Day on Wednesday, April 1. Our next earnings call is scheduled for Wednesday, May 6, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time when we'll review our first quarter 2020 results. We hope you can join us again at that time. Until then, be well.
Operator
[Operator Closing Remarks]
Duration: 37 minutes
Call participants:
John Kraus -- Director of Investor Relations
Patrick E. Bowe -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Brian A. Valentine -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Ben Bienvenu -- Stephens Inc. -- Analyst
Ken Zaslow -- Bank of Montreal -- Analyst
Eric Larson -- Buckingham Research -- Analyst
