Image source: The Motley Fool.
Clean Harbors Inc (CLH -1.53%)
Q2Â 2020 Earnings Call
Aug 5, 2020, 9:00 a.m. ET
Contents:
- Prepared Remarks
- Questions and Answers
- Call Participants
Prepared Remarks:
Operator
Greetings. Welcome to Clean Harbors' Second Quarter 2020 Conference Call. [Operator Instructions].
At this time, I'll turn the conference over to Michael McDonald, General Counsel for Clean Harbors. Thank you, Mr McDonald. You may now begin.
Michael R McDonald -- General Counsel
Thank you, Rob and good morning everyone. With me on today's call are Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Alan S. McKim; EVP and Chief Financial Officer, Mike Battles; and SVP of Investor Relations, Jim Buckley. Slides for today's call are posted on our website and we invite you to follow along.
Matters we are discussing today, that are not historical facts are considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Participants are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these statements, which reflect management's opinions only as of today, August 5, 2020. Information on potential factors and risks that could affect our actual results of operations is included in our SEC filings. The Company undertakes no obligation to revise or publicly release the results of any revision to the statements made in today's call, other than through filings made concerning this reporting period.
In addition, today's discussion will include references to non-GAAP measures. Clean Harbors believes that such information provides an additional measurement and consistent historical comparison of its performance. Reconciliations of non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are available in today's news release, on our website and in the appendix of today's presentation.
And now I'd like to turn the call over to our CEO, Alan McKim. Alan?
Alan S. McKim -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Thanks Michael. Good morning, everyone and thank you for joining us.
Before discussing our results, let me take this opportunity to publicly thank our entire Clean Harbors team, particularly those on the front lines for their outstanding work throughout the pandemic. Our Q2 performance underscores the versatility of our business model and our leadership role and emergency response. Responding to crisis is an integral part of the job here at Clean Harbors. It's in our DNA and that ability enabled us to jump into action late in Q1 and into Q2 with a wide-ranging response plan. It began with setting strict safety protocols and gathering the proper equipment to protect our workforce. We've been successfully at staying safe, the infection rate among our workforce remains well below the per capita rates of the U.S. and Canada.
Now let's turn to our high level overview for our Q2 results here on Slide 3. In response to the recessionary environment caused by COVID-19, we implemented a comprehensive series of actions that included implementing a hiring, wage and travel freeze, temporarily closing nearly half our rerefining capacity, transitioning a majority of our non-field based employees to work-from-home, lowering our capital spending, reducing our overall cost structure to align with revenues, launching our COVID-19 emergency response service offering.
On the strength of these actions and improving market conditions, since we spoke with you in late April, we delivered a better than expected performance in Q2. Revenues came in at $710 million, down 18% from prior year, with the bulk of that decline in our Safety-Kleen segment. Our adjusted EBITDA was $135.5 million for the quarter, which included a total of $23.4 million from the CARES Act here in the U.S. and the Canadian Emergency Wage Subsidy or CEWS. These programs enabled us to employ more workers than we would have otherwise been able to, with the pandemic related shutdowns.
Looking at our segment results beginning on Slide 4, Environmental Services revenues declined 12% from a year ago due to the COVID related slowdown across multiple lines of business, partly offset by incineration and decontamination work. Adjusted EBITDA grew 17% as a result of our cost reduction efforts, a strong performance in our facilities, emergency response revenue and the two government programs which accounted for $13.3 million in this segment. Emergency response work, whose margins tend to be above the corporate average, totalled $50 million in the quarter. Our incineration utilization increased to 87% due to our healthy backlog coming into the quarter and steady streams from chemical customers.
Our mix of higher value waste enabled us to drive our average price per pound up 6% from Q2 of last year. Our landfill volumes were down 24%, due to the deferral of some remediation and waste projects, but our base business remained stable, which drove our average price per ton, up 15% from a year ago. Overall, a real terrific quarter for our Environmental Services segment.
Given expected investor interest, on Slide 5 we wanted to provide some additional details around our COVID-19 response work. As of June 30th, we generated $60 million in revenue related to the virus. As of today, we are now at more than 7,000 responses and this work has opened doors for us to new customer relationships. Our jobs have varied from as small as -- from as a small as a armored vehicle clean out to as large as a NASCAR track. We anticipate that demand for our services will eventually subside over time, but we do anticipate over $100 million of corporate work in 2020.
Moving to Slide 6. Safety-Kleen revenue was down 30% due to a slowdown in both the branch and the SK Oil businesses, due to customer shutdowns. The reduced demand for our core offerings as well as the drop in base oil demand and lower pricing. Adjusted EBITDA declined 41% due to the lower revenue, pricing for our SK Oil products and costs associated with the temporary shuttering of our refineries, partly offset by cost reduction efforts and government assistance programs which totaled $8.3 million dollars for this segment in Q2.
Parts washer services were up 11% for the quarter and we collected 43 million gallons of waste oil, about two-thirds of our normal rate. Given where we were at the end of April, we are pleased to see this segment bounce back over the course of the quarter. Blended products and direct volumes on a percentage basis were in line with last year, but at a lower overall volume. Most recently, demand for base oil has recovered some, to the point that we restarted our Kansas and the Bartow rerefineries in July. The value of our base oil and blended products recovered somewhat over the course of Q2, however, with crude prices holding stable and vehicle miles driven remaining below traditional levels, we are proceeding cautiously before reopening any additional we rerefineries.
There may be pressure on pricing again in the back half of the year, as supply and lubricant demand go further out of balance and as a result we'll be continuously -- continuing to aggressively manage our charge for oil program.
Turning to capital allocation on Slide 7. Given the current environment, our strategy remains to focus on preserving cash to ensure we exit the pandemic in the best possible position. As we highlighted on our last call, we're carefully controlling our capex spend here in 2020 and expect to be well below last year's level. In terms of M&A and divestitures, we're not likely to be active on a near-term basis. That said, we are confident that we will emerge from this downturn in a stronger financial position and operational position than some of our peers, which will allow us to be opportunistic.
In terms of our debt, we repaid half of the $150 million, that we tapped on our revolver in Q2. And in late July, we repaid the other half, given our healthy cash position and how the company has performed. Looking ahead to the remainder of 2020, we believe we have positioned ourselves well for the current economic environment. Within multiple parts of our business, we've seen a measurable recovery from the lows we experienced in April. Within Environmental Services, our facilities network is still seeing a steady flow of waste volumes. We have not seen any meaningful decline from most of our large quantity generators, however, individual products, delays due to the virus remain common and we've seen slower production with some chemical customers. While that may limit our high margin volumes in the coming months, we anticipate areas like our industrial services and others to ramp up in the back half of the year, as maintenance and disposal work can only be deferred for so long.
Within Safety-Kleen, entered Q3 on a positive trajectory with the summer driving seizing increasing demand for our services, but we will still remain below prior year levels. We are monitoring the new shelter-in-place mandates closely, but to-date, the recent rise in COVID cases has not derailed the recovery in the SK branch business. For SK Oil, we're raising our production volumes with the restarted plants now online. We will continue to active manage our CFO rates to reflect the value of the waste oil and the collection services that we're providing.
In summary, our Q2 results demonstrated the resiliency of our business model. Our crisis management capabilities and our front-line role in COVID decontamination. Despite the economic uncertainties that remain, the actions that we've taken in responsive to the pandemic and our market leadership, gives us confidence that we can achieve our 2020 targets.
So with that let me turn it over to Mike Battles. Mike?
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Thank you, Alan and good morning everyone. Let me mirror Alan's comments about how effectively our organization responded to the pandemic. The work of our outstanding team is reflected into results we are sharing with you today. In these unprecedented times, the Clean Harbors team stood up to the challenges presented by this crisis. Personally, I couldn't be more proud of our organization.
Turning to Slide 9 and in our income statement, we delivered strong second quarter results in light of the pandemic. Revenue declined 18% and we aggressively managed the cost structure of the business in response to the slowdown. Those efforts, combined with the assistance we received from the two government programs, resulted in a 220 basis point improvement in gross margin.
As Alan highlighted, our EBITDA declined less than $15 million from a year ago, despite revenues being $159 million lower. Our adjusted EBITDA margin for the quarter was 19.1%, which speaks to how effectively we reduced costs, managed overtime, closed rerefineries and locations and furloughed workers as needed.
Our SG&A performance also demonstrates our comprehensive cost reduction efforts. Despite the fact that employee benefits including 401(k), are up significantly from a year ago, we lowered our SG&A expense by $20.1 million. Of that total, $9.1 million was related to the impact of CARES and CEWS. We flexed down our cost structure rapidly in the quarter, drastically cutting spending -- drastically cutting our spend in multiple areas such as travel and marketing. We also benefited from meaningfully lower healthcare costs in the quarter, which helped offset some severance and bad debt expense.
As expected, depreciation and amortization in Q2 was down slightly to $72.5 million with only one small bolt-on acquisition in the trailing 12 months, we should continue to see this trend going forward. For 2020, we expect depreciation and amortization in the range of $285 million to $295 million, which is slightly below last year. Income from operations to a $60.2 million, down 18%, reflecting the lower revenue and gross profit. EPS was $0.52 in Q2 versus $0.65 a year ago.
Turn to Slide 10. We emerged from the second quarter with our balance sheet in terrific shape. Our cash and short-term marketable securities exceeds $500 million at June 30th. That total includes $75 million of funds still drawn on our revolver that Alan referenced. The entire $150 million, which we bought out of the abundance of caution, when the pandemic begin has now been fully repaid. Given the COVID environment, our collection team keeps cash coming in the door from customers and our payables balance has shrunk with the lower revenue and associated costs.
After the full pay down of our revolver, our current and long-term debt obligations today sit at $1.56 billion. Our weighted average cost of debt remains at an attractive 4%, with a healthy blend of fixed and variable debt.
We've actually lowered our leverage in Q2 from where it was at in Q1. Leverage on a net debt basis now sits at 2.1 times for the trailing 12 months ended June 30th, which puts us in an excellent position financially. Our net debt to EBITDA ratio is down over 15% from a year ago.
Turning to cash flows in Slide 11. Cash from operations in Q2 was up 29% to $139.8 million. Capex, net of disposals, was down 25% to $42 million, reflecting our COVID response plan to preserve capital. The result was an adjusted free cash flow of $98.1 million, which is well ahead of prior year. Given how our cash flow has trended, we are slightly raising our expectation for capex. For the year, we're now targeting capex, net of disposals and the purchase of our headquarters in the range of $155 million to $175 million.
During the quarter, as planned, we did not repurchase any shares of stock and year-to-date repurchases stand at $17.3 million. We will be cautious in our approach to any meaningful level of buybacks, until the markets are well into their recovery stage.
Moving to guidance on Slide 12, given how well our business has performed throughout the pandemic and based on current market expectations -- conditions, we are reestablishing 2020 guidance. We now expect 2020 adjusted EBITDA in the range of $470 million to $500 million. This is based on the assumption of a slight slowdown in our Environmental Services profitability from Q2 levels while the Safety-Kleen segment improved sequentially. This guidance assumes that there will be continued localized outbreaks of the virus, but does not assume any kind of nationwide shelter-in-place like we saw in early Q2. Looking at our guidance range from a quarterly perspective, we expect our adjusted EBITDA in the second half of the year to be evenly split between Q3 and Q4.
Here's how our full-year 2020 guidance translates from a segment perspective. In Environmental Services, we expect adjusted EBITDA to be just slightly above 2019's level of $446 million. Growth and profitability within incineration, contributions from the expected $100 million in decontamination work and comprehensive cost reduction initiatives will offset declines in profitability within industrial services, landfills, remediations, waste projects and other lines of business. For Safety-Kleen, we anticipate adjusted EBITDA to decline approximately 20% from 2019's $282 million. We expect the branch business to remain below pre-COVID levels in the back half as vehicle miles driven are still less than historical norms but well above Q2 levels.
At the same time, we expect SK Oil to rebound from a challenging second quarter as the base oil market improves from a difficult, April-May period and we continue to aggressively manage the front-end of our rerefining spend -- spread. In our corporate segment, we expect negative adjusted EBITDA to be essentially flat from 2019's $188 million, due to increases in 401(k) severance and bad debt, largely offset by lower incentive compensation and cost savings. Based on our current guidance and working capital assumptions, we expect 2020 adjusted free cash flow in the range of $200 million to $230 million. Free cash flow is always hard to accurately predict due to the influence of working capital demands. However, with our ability to defer all payroll tax payments from April to year-end, we should total $360 million[Phonetic]. It is likely that we will deliver free cash flow to shareholders, certainly north of $200 million.
In summary, while Q2 was not without its challenges, it proved to be a strong operational quarter for the business. As Alan highlighted, we are a crisis response company at our core and we can thrive in these types of dynamic environments. Looking ahead, we will pursue additional cost control initiatives for market conditions remain limited. That said, we see the opportunity for some of our stalled lines of business to recover. Some of our project and turnaround work, may ultimately push out until 2021, but we see enough opportunity in the market today to support our facilities network in the back half of the year.
Within Safety-Kleen, we expect a steady uptick in demand for our core branch services, while with -- meanwhile within SK Oil, we will continue to ramp up base and blended production. And lastly, we remain focused on providing COVID decontamination services, as the race toward a vaccine continues.
With that. Rob, please open up the call for questions.
Questions and Answers:
Operator
Thank you. We'll now be conducting a Question and Answer session. [Operator Instructions] And our first question is coming from the line of Tyler Brown with Raymond James. Please proceed with your question.
Tyler Brown -- Raymond James Financial Inc. -- Analyst
Hey, good morning guys.
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Hey, Tyler.
Tyler Brown -- Raymond James Financial Inc. -- Analyst
Hey Mike. So I just want to make sure that I have it, but the $23 million in EBITDA from the assistance, was that basically a PPP payment with roughly half of it, in ES and half in SK or is that, is that not right?
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yeah so, Tyler, it is. So first of all, before we get into it, in my prepared remarks, I said -- we talked about free cash flow for the year, we're going to defer some payroll tax payments. And I should have said $36 million, I think I said $360 million, so that's wrong. So $36 million is the right number just FYI, so people...
Tyler Brown -- Raymond James Financial Inc. -- Analyst
Got that.
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Crazy. So tie that back to your question. So the money we received is broken into two parts. The portion of it is from the Canadian government, as Alan mentioned, the Canadian Emergency Wage Subsidy and that's about $10 million of that and the other $13 million or so is from the CARES Act. That's not PPP loan, that is part of that is a retention credit and that money is not refundable. It's a grant, not a loan. And that is broken out between $13 million in ES, $8 million in SK in about $2 million in corporate...
Tyler Brown -- Raymond James Financial Inc. -- Analyst
Okay. Yeah, no, that's very helpful...
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
You got the reimbursement of wages, Tyler, its all in the P&L where it belongs. Whether it be COGS or SG&A, what have you.
Tyler Brown -- Raymond James Financial Inc. -- Analyst
Okay. Yeah, no, that's very helpful. But to be clear, there is not an expectation of additional assistance in the back half guide?
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
There's nothing there today. I do think both CEWS, second version that they're working through the Canadian government and the CARES Act, both the House and the Senate Bill have additional monies available for the retention credit. How much we get and how much we qualify for is an open question. And there isn't really much of anything in the back half of the year in the number we gave this morning.
Tyler Brown -- Raymond James Financial Inc. -- Analyst
Okay. Awesome. That's helpful. And so, Alan, this may be a hard question because I know that there is a lot going on in SK. But based on where base oil is and CFO is today and if you isolate it, just the rerefineries that are operating, let's call it normally, do you feel that you're achieving an adequate spread or even a pre-COVID spread on those gallons? I mean, it's a gut feel. But it feels that the team is managing the spread very well, but it's really hard to see with all the noise.
Alan S. McKim -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Yeah. I think, we're really managing the spread very well, but unfortunately, we are carrying and have been carrying a lot of surplus capacity. Because when all the state shut down and when all the driving really, was significantly reduced, the volume of waste oil, obviously available to us was significantly impacted and then also, the demand for our oil was also significantly impacted. And so, on both sides of the coin, we had to address that. And so by temporarily shutting our plants, we always keep people there, we always have to keep the plants ready and in compliance. So we carry a lot more cost when -- that otherwise, would be absorbed if they were running. So I think, the team has done a really good job of managing the spread.
Tyler Brown -- Raymond James Financial Inc. -- Analyst
Okay. And just, would we expect that gallons collected would just be slightly under -- last back half of '19? Is that a good expectation?
Alan S. McKim -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
I think, we're seeing -- we're bringing drivers back. We did have to furlough some drivers and we're bringing them back, we are hiring more drivers today. So our expectations by the end of the year, that our volumes would be back to where they were based on what we're seeing right now.
Tyler Brown -- Raymond James Financial Inc. -- Analyst
Okay. And then my -- that's great. And then my last one, Mike. So I think, you guys are about as cash heavy as maybe we've ever seen you. Your leverage is at 2 times, you have a 4% coupon, think you're projecting additional cash flow in the back half. I totally appreciate the four pillars of the capital allocation, but when should we really think about you putting some capital to work, maybe, on buybacks or acquisitions?
Alan S. McKim -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
I think -- this is Alan. I mean, we would very much like to continue with our acquisitions. We've had some discussions out there, we've been looking at some opportunities that have been presenting themselves. Again, we're somewhat relieved that we didn't do a couple of deals that we have looked real hard at, prior to COVID, because I think integrating acquisitions during that those last four or five months would have been extremely difficult with -- at least in our case, over 3,000 people working from home.
So I think, as we get out of this pandemic and we get people back, I think, we're going to be in a better position to acquire and integrate businesses like we have in the past.
Tyler Brown -- Raymond James Financial Inc. -- Analyst
All right. Well, great, guys. I appreciate it.
Alan S. McKim -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Okay.
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Thanks, Tyler.
Operator
The next question is from the line of David Manthey with Baird. Please proceed with your questions.
David Manthey -- Robert W. Baird & Company -- Analyst
Yeah. Thank you. Good morning, guys.
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Morning, Dave.
Alan S. McKim -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Morning, Dave.
David Manthey -- Robert W. Baird & Company -- Analyst
Yeah. So, first off, a three-part question on ES. First, do you have a read on what we might see in terms of incinerator capacity utilization in the third quarter? Related to that, second is, did you pulled forward any scheduled downtime and then third, you mentioned ES profitability is supposed to be lower, quarter-over-quarter, here sequentially, is that due to the reject -- reduction in the government assisted programs or is that if we exclude the benefits here in the second quarter?
Alan S. McKim -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
I think on the -- maybe Mike will take the downtime, but my anticipation is that the normal turnarounds for our incinerators is progressing and we didn't pull anything forward and we did bite into our deferred a little bit, but quite frankly, it was above the historical average anyway, so when we came into the -- at the end of the first quarter, we had a lot of waste, not only on site but throughout our TACF [Phonetic] network. So I think, we feel good about where we are now on a deferred basis and I think, the plants are running as expected and I would think utilization will continue to be quite strong. Mike, you want to chime in on?
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yeah, sure, Dave. So first of all, there is no in the back half numbers, there is no government money. That if we do get any money, it will be upside to the model, maybe like a $1 million under that, under the Canadian Wage Subsidy, but that's about it. So just, so -- just to set expectations there. Utilization in the second half will be -- was normal. I think, the mix is not, is really what's going to drive a little bit of profitability with chemical being down a little bit versus Q2, remember, we're waste -- just we get some of that -- we get this -- we get the waste late and I think, we're experiencing a little bit here in July. Not a lot, I think it's flattish, if I'd have to say and from Q2 to Q3 in the incineration part of the business. Down days are normal, nothing, we didn't move anything around.
David Manthey -- Robert W. Baird & Company -- Analyst
Okay. Sounds good. And then just a two-parter on the SK side. Is it right to assume that as the facilities went down, those shuttered facilities did routine maintenance on and you pulled that forward? And then second, Alan, you mentioned the potential for lube oil supply and demand getting out of balance, later this year. I was just wondering if you could clarify that statement.
Alan S. McKim -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Sure. I guess, on the shuttered and maintenance -- or maintenance, we also did quite a bit of capital investments in a number of the plants that were shutted. So, our anticipation was as if this was going to be temporary and we did take advantage of being down to accelerate a couple of key capex projects that are going to be complete here relatively soon.
I think, the -- as we see the crude oil runs for the refineries and the amount of products that have been made, obviously, that has recovered quite a bit. Although, we refineries maybe only still running 75%, 80%. With the significant decline in jet fuel, certainly, there is -- to some extent we think, pressure on the base oil side of the business as well as with IMO not really kind of materializing, we just see that the market is still somewhat out of balance from our expectations, where we were in January and February. And I think that was really the kind of color that we were trying to explain in our remarks.
David Manthey -- Robert W. Baird & Company -- Analyst
That's great. Thanks very much.
Alan S. McKim -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Okay.
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Okay. Thanks, Dave.
Operator
Our next question is coming from the line of Michael Hoffman with Stifel. Please proceed with your question.
Michael E. Hoffman -- Stifel Financial Corp. -- Analyst
Thank you, very much. On SKO, what should we be using for production activity in the second half, just instead of trying to guess the gallons per plant that are being turned on? Till 120 [Phonetic] at East Chicago, Kansas is what 15. El Dorado is 10.
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
I don't have that -- I am not going to have that number handy. I surely...
Alan S. McKim -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Those are directionally, those are the right numbers...
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yeah.
Alan S. McKim -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
I would say, Michael, for those three locations.
Michael E. Hoffman -- Stifel Financial Corp. -- Analyst
Okay. And then average branch revenue per week, how would you describe the trend relative to pre-COVID? Where are we percent recovery?
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yeah. So, Michael, it's all about exit velocity here in June and so we were in the low 80% range by branch by week as we exited June. We have that ramping up into the mid-to-high 80s as we get into Q3 and back into the low 90s in Q4 for the SK branch business.
Michael E. Hoffman -- Stifel Financial Corp. -- Analyst
Okay. All right. That's terrific. And then...
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
That makes sense?
Michael E. Hoffman -- Stifel Financial Corp. -- Analyst
Yes. Yeah, I think that makes sense. And then, I just want to make sure I heard -- I was scribbling numbers of fast, I want to make sure I got it right. So the guidance says, ES is flat to up, year-over-year, SK is down 20% and then corporate overhead is basically flat and that gets you about the midpoint at $485 million.
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Correct. that's right. Okay. In the SK, I'm assuming, your inference was -- to down 20% that the SK eased down more than 20%, SKO is less than 20%. How -- what's the gap there? Is it one is 25% and one is 15% and -- or how do I think about that? No. The losses are probably more in the SKO side than the SKE side.
Michael E. Hoffman -- Stifel Financial Corp. -- Analyst
Okay. Okay. And then in your mid-point of guidance what should I account for the benefit from decontamination, and I'm assuming there's $23.4 million in the $485 million in both free cash flow and the $215 million for the free cash flow in the $485 million for EBITDA, but what's the decon piece of both of those?
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
So we don't give that -- we don't give that number out for competitive reasons, it's above the corporate average though.
Michael E. Hoffman -- Stifel Financial Corp. -- Analyst
Above the corporate average, OK. All right. That's what I needed. Thank you so much.
Operator
Our next question is from the line of Jeff Silber with BMO Capital Markets. Please proceed with your questions.
Jeff Silber -- BMO Capital Markets -- Analyst
Thanks so much. Just wanted to go back to the pandemic relief funding. I just want to make sure I understand it. This is not in revenues, This is just an offset either a cost of services or SG&A. Is that correct?
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Correct.
Jeff Silber -- BMO Capital Markets -- Analyst
Okay I just wanted to double check on that. Alan, you mentioned IMO 2020 briefly, can we get an update on what's going on there and what you think is going to happen over the rest of the year?
Alan S. McKim -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
I just think there has been such a huge disruption. As you know, the whole shift from the 3% sulfur to 0.5% certainly has taken place. I don't think that we have heard of any relief at all given. But I think just the sheer volume of decline in demand for 0.5% oil and subsequently how that impacted the VGO market, the Vacuum Gas Oil market, all of that, it's just been turned upside down. So when we, when we looked at where we were coming into early January to where we are today, I mean it's just a total different ball game from other then we can see.
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yeah, Jeff, one thing to add. So just to be clear, IMO is still regulation. It still applies. It's just -- ships are moving, right, cruise ships tankers, it hasn't really gotten unstuck and so Alan is, obviously IMO is, if we had visions at this time having IMO being a big catalyst for this business in 2020 and it hasn't happened yet. That doesn't mean it's not going to happen, If it hasn't happened yet, because of the pandemic, frankly.
Alan S. McKim -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Yeah.
Jeff Silber -- BMO Capital Markets -- Analyst
Yeah, completely understandable. And one final one. We get this question alot, so I'll just ask you, we've got a big election coming up over the next few months. Anything on the horizon, besides tax reform that you think might impact your business if we have a change in administration. Thanks.
Alan S. McKim -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
I don't think so at this point, I mean, we've seen historically that no matter what administration is in, environmental rules and regulations are being enforced and new ones are being promulgated. So I don't, we don't typically see one one administration to another really impacting our business on the short-term.
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
I mean, we can debate as to what's going to happen with corporate tax reform, in a different administration, but a lot of the state -- lot of the regulations around what we have to comply with is at state level, and they're just as diligent as they've always has been with enforcing state regulations on us and on our customers.
Jeff Silber -- BMO Capital Markets -- Analyst
Okay, great. Really helpful. Thanks so much.
Operator
Our next question is from the line of Hamzah Mazari with Jefferies. Please proceed with your question.
Hamzah Mazari -- Jefferies Group LLC -- Analyst
Hey, good morning. Thank you. I was hoping you could...
Michael E. Hoffman -- Stifel Financial Corp. -- Analyst
Hi.
Hamzah Mazari -- Jefferies Group LLC -- Analyst
Hi, I was hoping maybe you could just give us an update on just what you're seeing in the captive incinerator market, are you seeing more of those shut down, are you seeing people acquire them, how does that capacity evolve over time? And anything with COVID that disrupts that, just any update there would be helpful.
Alan S. McKim -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
We've seen a lot of, what I would say, a lot of noise in that area, as you can imagine because as customers, excuse me, as our customers were impacted by COVID, obviously that impacted their plants and in some cases we saw captive have shut down and we got a lot of volume because of that. We're not sure where all this is going to shake out because there is so much uncertainty there. But Hamzah, I would say that it's been a positive for us. We did see one plant that was taken over by our competitor that really struggled to try to handle commercial hazards waste of that site. We subsequently -- we regained that business that we had lost to them and I think that's probably true for any captive out there, that wants to try to go commercial, very difficult to have all the necessary pre-treatment and processing capability to, kind of, handle the, kind of, waste that commercial hazardous waste business generates. So I would say that we're still looking at the captive of closures as a positive for us.
Hamzah Mazari -- Jefferies Group LLC -- Analyst
Got it. And just my follow-up question would be, just around the average price per pound in the incinerators. We were running at double digits and we're at 6% today, which is still very healthy. And I realize it's a function of mix, but could you just comment on, do you see mix benefits as decelerating, given where we were, or just how to think about the average price per pound of the incinerator going forward? Is 6% the right number going forward relative to the long history you've had, or is this going to go back to sort of the double-digits that we saw pre-COVID.
Alan S. McKim -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
We continue to look at mix as the most important thing right now for us that's in our control, but I would tell you that we've taken our foot off the gas on price increases right now realizing where our customers are. We saw it on the industrial side of our business, for example, we saw big request for discounting and lowering of our price for the next six months or nine months. So we, what we have been trying to do is, work with our customers out there. We've held off on any new price increases realizing where everybody is and dealing with this pandemic and we'll probably we look at that in January, but I think the price number that you will see is going to be really reflective of of the mix right now.
Hamzah Mazari -- Jefferies Group LLC -- Analyst
Got it. Thank you so much.
Alan S. McKim -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Okay. Hamzah.
Operator
The next question is from the line of Brian Maguire with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed with your questions.
Brian Maguire -- Goldman Sachs Group, Inc -- Analyst
Hey, good morning.
Alan S. McKim -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Good morning.
Brian Maguire -- Goldman Sachs Group, Inc -- Analyst
Just a couple. One, I think, just little bit back to Michael's question, about just the, with the two rerefineries restarting, any sense where production volumes could be in 3Q versus the 2Q level or sales volumes, if you could get back regular with it.
Alan S. McKim -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
I think the combined number's about 35 million gallons from those two on a annualized basis and they are both running -- typically our plants will run full board when we start them back up again. So by the end of July, we've made the decision to turn those two plants on. So that would be the annualized number.
Brian Maguire -- Goldman Sachs Group, Inc -- Analyst
Okay.
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Maybe I'll try to answer your question a little different way, Brian and that we'll be at kind of 75% without Breslau and as we think about the profitability of that business, we took the, kind of, the exit velocity in June and, kind of, was very modest as how we think about July, August and September. So it really is, it's a modest recovery from where they landed in Q2 and with the ramp-up going into Q3 and Q4 and then to 2021.
Brian Maguire -- Goldman Sachs Group, Inc -- Analyst
Okay, great. And then on the SG&A down $20 million or so year-over-year, I was wondering how much of that you think is sustainable, either through the back half of the year or probably more importantly just once we get, sort of, through the crisis, expecting probably a lot of the healthcare stuff will come back, all the delayed surgeries and people getting back to work. We'll probably see reflation in that travel expense, maybe doesn't come all the way back but comes back some, obviously some of the government assistance that goes away, but, kind of, of the $20 million, how much of that you think is truly out of the business versus something will eventually come back in.
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yeah, Brian, it's actually really good question that we've done a lot of work to think about, both on the cost of goods sold and on SG&A, both have some real cost savings in there. Some of it is government funding and it goes away. But I think of it kind of as as three different buckets. The first bucket is, things that happened to every company in the world with healthcare cost for yourself insured going down and travel cost going down and other things that kind of affected everybody. And so, obviously we are the beneficiary of that. And my assumption is that, in a post-pandemic world over some time horizon, those costs come back relatively quickly six months, three months, a year depending on how you look at it. The other costs are things that kind of, because of the crisis because without leadership is lower for longer, we took some aggressive actions around taking costs out of the business, both on the SG&A side and on the op side, we're looking at over time, looking at employee utilization, looking at leases, looking at facilities, shuttering facilities, shutting locations, being very aggressive about that. And I think, my view on that is that we actually put some good tools in place to manage that more effectively and those types of tools and that type of muscle it doesn't go away in the moment we all get a shot in our arm. So, I really do believe that over the longer horizon, both on the SG&A and on the cost side, there is margin expansion that we'll experience out of here, because the cost we took out, the actions we took didn't affect sales, I mean, the sales force is there and we're hopeful that when that recovers we'll have an opportunity there to really leverage our cost structure to be more -- and be smarter about it and can take some of the lessons we've learned in this pandemic and apply it over the longer horizon.
So what the exact number is of the $20 million stays and goes, it's going to be hard to put a finger on. There is a lot of offsets to that with bad debt and other things, but I think that over the long haul, there really is a lesson here that we've learned in that and there is some real savings we'll get over the longer horizon.
Brian Maguire -- Goldman Sachs Group, Inc -- Analyst
Yes. Just last one for me. We appreciate everything you're doing on decontamination side to help people get back to work. Just looking at that market, obviously, it's kind of a -- great to have it while you have it. But for a lot of reasons you hope that it doesn't continue forever.
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yes.
Brian Maguire -- Goldman Sachs Group, Inc -- Analyst
But are you seeing just the competitiveness in that business? I mean, it seems like one where a lot of people are probably looking to get into that market because of the opportunity today. So the $50 million or so that you had in the quarter, it seems like you're expecting some deceleration. Just wondering how much of that is just because you think that the actual market is going to be shrinking from 2Q levels versus just increased competition or new entrants as the year progresses?
Alan S. McKim -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
I guess, I would say that there's always been competition and we've got the some of the decontamination work that we have historically done and I think, people choose Clean Harbors really for the professional approach that we take and the training and the personal protection and really, sort of, the insurance policy that we provide for them.
And there are plenty of firms out there that are janitorial, kind of, firms that will also provide that kind of decontamination work, but we just think that we're not really competing with them, we don't look at this from a pricing standpoint to be competitive with these other players out there. So any slowdown is not necessarily because we have competition, I just hope we all pray that it's going to continue to slow down as the infection rate slows down.
Brian Maguire -- Goldman Sachs Group, Inc -- Analyst
Yeah. Absolutely. Okay, thanks so much, guys. Good luck.
Alan S. McKim -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Thank you.
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Okay.
Operator
Thank you. The next question is from the line of Noah Kaye with Oppenheimer.
Noah Kaye -- Oppenheimer & Co -- Analyst
Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question and really nice job managing both, the profitability and the safety. I would like to start with just clarifying maybe, expectations around the price mix trajectory in ES. So it sounds like we may see a bit of downward pressure in the back half, partly from mix and then also from pausing these price increases. I guess, looking a little bit longer term, with the assumption that you could maybe, resume price increases for a portion of your customer base in '21 and then just assessing production planning for petrochem, do you think we could potentially see a reacceleration of price mix benefits in '21? Is that a reasonable expectation at this point?
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yeah, Noah, that's a good question. Too early to kind of talk about 2021, but I will say that in over the past 10 years in our pricing, we've been able to get 3.7% and I don't see anything that's going to change that in a post pandemic world. So, tough to really speak to 2021, but I would say that the pause that Alan spoke of, it does affect Q2 and Q3 and I think that it's going to be the smart thing to do, the smart business decision to do, but over the long horizon, I don't see that -- I don't see a any type of shift there.
As a matter of fact what I do see is that -- and there is an opportunity for Clean Harbors, when you talk about putting supply chains closer to our -- to the end customers and it's something that, what is learned is that might not be a terrible idea. So I think that might be a long-term catalyst for us over the next five years.
Noah Kaye -- Oppenheimer & Co -- Analyst
Yeah. Makes sense. And then just, where does the few past remediation opportunity sit at this point obviously there's been some noise around both, the cleanup and then incineration, as a treatment options? How are you thinking about the opportunity?
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yeah, Noah, I'll take a shot and Alan, I'm sure, has a view on this. Is that few past remains has a very important opportunity for us and nothing has changed in a post pandemic world and that, in that, I think, that we really could get as -- perhaps, a new administration, maybe that changes. I don't know, but we still know as a real opportunity that's out there and we think it's very compelling. We took a lot of inbound traffic on it, instill a lot of learning on it and I think it's going to be a long-term catalyst for the industry.
Noah Kaye -- Oppenheimer & Co -- Analyst
Great. Okay, thanks guys. Nice job. Stay safe. Thank you.
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Hey Noah.
Alan S. McKim -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Thank Noah.
Operator
[Operator Instructions] The next question is from the line of Jim Ricchiuti with Needham & Company. Please proceed with your questions.
Mike Cikos -- Needham & Company -- Analyst
Hi, guys. This is Mike Cikos on for Jim Ricchiuti. Thanks for all the detail and the color today.
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Hi, Mike.
Mike Cikos -- Needham & Company -- Analyst
I was curious if you could give me some more detail, coming back to this de-con work, the $100 million or so we're expecting in 2020. So coming back to the slide, looks like you generated $60 million year-to-date, $50 million in Q2. So that additional $10 million, is that what's coming in Q3 so far or was that a partial benefit to Q1?
And then how -- I guess, if we're looking out to the rest of 2020, should we expect this to kind of tail off in Q3 and then an additional tail off in Q4?
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yeah, Mike. So the original -- so the $60 million, think of it this way. For the first half of the year, $10 million of it was actually in Q1, toward the end of March and $50 million was in Q2. So we're at $60 million kind of year-to-date through the end of Q2. We said $100 million, so that implies that $40 million in the back half of the year, more in Q3 and less in Q4. That give you what you need?
Mike Cikos -- Needham & Company -- Analyst
Yes. Yes, exactly. And then coming back to the assistance funding that you guys received. I'm just curious, could you help us better separate what was included in cost of goods sold versus opex? Is it as simple as taking the the $2 million in assistance that's attributed to corporate and assigning that to opex, with the remaining, call it, $21 million or so up in COGS?
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
We'll give you all -- here's all the details. So you have it and it's in our financial statement. That Q is going to be filed in a minute. So it'll be all laid out there as well. So as I...
Mike Cikos -- Needham & Company -- Analyst
Okay.
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
$23.4 million in Q2, $14 million of it in COGS and about $9 million of in SG&A. And as a broken out by segment, $13 million in Environmental Services $8 million in SK and $2 million in corporate.
Mike Cikos -- Needham & Company -- Analyst
Okay. Thank you for that. Let me just -- one other question if I could squeeze one more in. Just looking at the EBITDA guidance range that you gave us for the year, there' $470 million to $500 million. Can you help us parse out some of the puts and takes, if I'm trying to think about what gets you to the $470 million versus what would need to go right or go your way to get you up to that $500 million bogey?
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Sure. So, in my opinion, it really is the speed and trajectory of of the growth of certain parts of our business. When you think about the Environmental Services business, if that business bows down, in theory, the de-con work will be an offset to that is as crazy as that sound. And so I'm not really as concerned about the Environmental Services business.
On the Safety-Kleen business, it depends on the trajectory of kind of miles driven and the demand in oil and that is the variable that's going to drive us to the low end of that range and versus the high end of that range. If that picks up and continues on its current trajectory and does even better and that will really drive that. And corporate expenses, we manage pretty tightly as you know and so that's going to be what it is.
It really comes down to the, in my opinion, the SK business will kind of result in either the high end or the low end of our guidance.
Mike Cikos -- Needham & Company -- Analyst
That's very helpful. Best of luck, guys. Thank you.
Alan S. McKim -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Thank you.
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Thanks, Mike.
Operator
Our next question is from the line of Matthew Fields, Bank of America. Please proceed with your question.
Matthew Fields -- Bank of America -- Analyst
Hey, guys. Just wanted to ask a balance sheet question -- I appreciate you paid down, half the revolver balance in the quarter, but given the pretty robust cash balance you have now and then the robust, kind of, free cash flow outlook for the back half of the year, why not pay down the full balance and -- or is that something you're planning to do if the rest of the year works out in your, kind of, plan?
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Matthew, that's a genius idea. We actually paid it down before the -- in early July. And so when we mentioned that in the script, you must have not gotten that far.
Matthew Fields -- Bank of America -- Analyst
Oh, sorry. Yeah, I dialed in late. There is few earnings this morning...
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
That is OK. I know.
Matthew Fields -- Bank of America -- Analyst
And then sort of against that same backdrop. I know you don't have any real scheduled maturities but what do you think about kind of your overall debt load as a function of kind of leverage, balancing leverage with kind of may be ramping share buybacks up late in this year, giving your kind of healthy free cash flow. Where does that balance strike you, at kind of, this point in the recovery?
Alan S. McKim -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
I think our real focus right now is to try to grow the business and grow through organic growth as well as acquisitions and I think we're well positioned to do that with still a substantial amount of our workforce working from home when we start thinking about doing an acquisition and integrating those and and how we typically would go about an acquisition, that would make it a lot more difficult for us to do today than we hope will be in the next, let's say six months or so. So, I'd like to think that we could really take advantage of the strong balance sheet we have and the low debt leverage we have and do an acquisition that would be a sizable transaction for us. That's what I'd like us to do.
Matthew Fields -- Bank of America -- Analyst
Okay, fair enough. Good luck. Thanks. Thanks a lot. Apologies I missed the scripted remarks.
Alan S. McKim -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
No problem. Thank you.
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Hey, Matt. No Problem.
Operator
Thank you. At this time, we've reached the end of our question-and-answer session. And I will now turn the call back over to Mr. Alan McKim for closing remarks.
Alan S. McKim -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Okay, Rob. Thank you. Thanks for joining us today. I hope that all of you and your families are saying safe during this pandemic. Over the remainder of this month, we are participating in virtual investor conferences with Needham, Stifel and Raymond James. We look forward to connecting with many of you then. Have a great day.
Operator
[Operator Closing Remarks]
Duration: 53 minutes
Call participants:
Michael R McDonald -- General Counsel
Alan S. McKim -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Michael L. Battles -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Tyler Brown -- Raymond James Financial Inc. -- Analyst
David Manthey -- Robert W. Baird & Company -- Analyst
Michael E. Hoffman -- Stifel Financial Corp. -- Analyst
Jeff Silber -- BMO Capital Markets -- Analyst
Hamzah Mazari -- Jefferies Group LLC -- Analyst
Brian Maguire -- Goldman Sachs Group, Inc -- Analyst
Noah Kaye -- Oppenheimer & Co -- Analyst
Mike Cikos -- Needham & Company -- Analyst
Matthew Fields -- Bank of America -- Analyst
